LabMD: The End of the FTC in Cyber, or Just a New Path?

Alston & Bird
Contact

Our Privacy & Data Security Group reviews the Eleventh Circuit’s decision narrowing the FTC’s authority to impose broad cybersecurity measures on defendants, but cautions it would be a mistake to interpret the ruling as preventing the FTC from regulating cybersecurity and data privacy.

  • FTC order lacked specificity necessary to be enforceable
  • Does not mean that the FTC will be less vigilant
  • What does this opinion mean for the future?
 

Last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its opinion in LabMD, Inc. v. FTC, No. 16-16270 (11th Cir. June 6, 2018), declaring unenforceable a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) order requiring LabMD to implement an extensive cybersecurity plan. This article will review the history of the matter, which influences its posture, and the opinion itself. We also discuss potential future FTC cyber enforcement in light of both LabMD and a prior Third Circuit case, FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp.

Procedural Background

The LabMD matter dates to 2005, when LimeWire file sharing software was installed on a company computer in violation of company policy. According to the Court, a LabMD employee designated the contents of the employee’s “My Documents” folder for sharing. In doing so, the employee exposed a file containing the healthcare information of 9,300 patients. In February 2008, a computer security company, Tiversa, downloaded that file and used the healthcare information it contained to pitch its cybersecurity services to LabMD. When LabMD refused Tiversa’s services, Tiversa gave the information to both the FTC and a college professor who used the information as part of a publication on data security in the healthcare industry.

After an investigation, the FTC issued an administrative complaint against LabMD and assigned an administrative law judge (ALJ) to the case, alleging that LabMD’s data security program was inadequate and therefore constituted an “unfair act or practice” under 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The FTC argued that LabMD’s cybersecurity measures were deficient as a whole, eventually proposing an order “which would regulate all aspects of LabMD’s data-security program” and “sweeping prophylactic measures” that would require the company to “maintain a data-security program ‘reasonably designed’ to the Commission’s satisfaction” for at least 20 years. Meanwhile, LabMD denied that it had engaged in unfair trade practices and challenged the FTC’s authority under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to regulate its handling of personal information. LabMD is no longer in business and ceased to do business prior to the Eleventh Circuit decision.

The ALJ dismissed the FTC’s complaint, holding that the agency failed to prove that LabMD did not “employ reasonable data security” measures that “caused, or [were] likely to cause substantial injury to consumers.” The FTC appealed the ruling to the Commission itself, which unanimously reversed the ALJ’s decision in July 2016, finding that LabMD’s data security practices were unfair under Section 5 and that Section 5(a)’s unfairness standard was not void for vagueness. (The staff of the FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection may bring administrative complaints before an ALJ. Either the FTC staff or respondents may petition the full Commission for review of an ALJ initial decision.)

Following the Commission’s opinion, LabMD requested and the Commission denied a stay of the order pending review by the Eleventh Circuit. LabMD moved the Eleventh Circuit to stay enforcement of the FTC order because “compliance with the order was unfeasible given LabMD’s defunct status and de minimis assets,” and in November 2016, the Court unanimously granted the motion over the FTC’s objections. LabMD then petitioned the Eleventh Circuit for review.

The Eleventh Circuit Ruling

On June 6,, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit reversed the commission’s ruling upon a de novo review. According to the Court, the FTC had the authority to simply order LabMD to implement a program preventing employees from installing third-party software on their company computers, thus addressing the relevant data security incident. Instead, the Eleventh Circuit held, the FTC’s order required the company’s data security program “to meet an indeterminable standard of reasonableness.” Rather than “enjoin a specific act or practice,” the order mandated “a complete overhaul of LabMD’s data-security program and says precious little about how this is to be accomplished.” The practical result, observed the Court, “is that the district court is put in the position of managing LabMD’s business in accordance with the Commission’s wishes...as if the Commission was LabMD’s chief executive officer and the court was its operating officer.” The Court held that “this micromanaging is beyond the scope of court oversight contemplated by injunction law.”

In reaching its decision, the Court discussed the scope of the FTC’s unfairness authority. The applicable standard defines unfairness as any act that “(1) caused consumers, competitors, or other businesses substantial injury; [or] (2) offended public policy as established by statute, the common law, or otherwise.” The Court then explained that the second “public policy” prong of the unfairness test requires that unfairness “be grounded in statute, judicial decisions——i.e., the common law—or the Constitution.”

Thus, the Court reasoned, for LabMD’s actions to have been unfair, they must have violated “‘clear and well-established’ policies that are expressed in the Constitution, statutes, or the common law.” While the commission’s decision here failed to expressly cite any clearly established statute or common law principle that LabMD violated, the Court nevertheless reasoned that the judicially enshrined public policy used by the commission was the common law of negligence. And while both sides briefed the issue of substantial injury (the first prong of the unfairness test), the Court did not address it in its holding.

After reviewing the elements of negligence, the Court reframed LabMD’s unfair practice as the unintentional invasion of the right to privacy. Having done so, the Court then assumed for the sake of argument that LabMD’s negligence in failing to reasonably protect consumer information constituted an unfair practice.

Ultimately, the Eleventh Circuit held unenforceable the FTC’s order because the agency’s complaint lacked sufficient specificity. The Court observed that the FTC’s Rule of Practice requires commission complaints to contain “[a] clear and concise factual statement sufficient to inform each respondent with reasonable definiteness of the type of acts or practices alleged to be in violation of the law.” From there, the Court reasoned that any remedy a complaint seeks “must comport with this requirement of reasonable definiteness.”

In the eyes of the Eleventh Circuit, the FTC’s cease and desist order fatally contained “no prohibitions.” Rather than instructing LabMD “to stop committing a specific act or practice,” it commanded the company to “overhaul and replace its data-security program to meet an indeterminable standard of reasonableness.” Put another way, the vagueness in the FTC’s complaint—which alleged that LabMD’s data security practices were deficient as a whole— translated into vagueness in the remedy sought by the FTC; it was that same vagueness that rendered the FTC order unenforceable. 

FTC Enforcement Post-LabMD

The LabMD decision inevitably constrains the FTC’s authority to impose a broad and comprehensive cybersecurity program on defendants, absent specific measures appropriate under the circumstances. In our view, though, it would be a mistake to interpret the decision as preventing the FTC from regulating cybersecurity and data privacy. The Eleventh Circuit indeed recognized the FTC’s authority to do just that. Instead, LabMD requires the FTC to issue orders with greater specificity, depending on the facts of the case, and does not call into question the broader issue of whether the FTC can regulate data security at all.

The Eleventh Circuit’s holding in LabMD must also be considered in light of the Third Circuit’s earlier ruling in FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 799 F.3d 236 (3rd Cir. 2015). There, Wyndham Worldwide’s privacy statement promised its customers that the company would protect their data, including credit card information, using “industry standard practices,” including encryption, firewalls, and other “commercially reasonable methods.” In fact, the company implemented none of these measures. And after an initial security breach, the company apparently failed to appropriately remediate, resulting in two more breaches and the compromise of personal information of hundreds of thousands of consumers. The Third Circuit upheld the FTC’s authority to enforce a cybersecurity order against Wyndham Worldwide, holding that the company had engaged in unfair trade practices, “unreasonably and unnecessarily exposing consumers’ personal data to unauthorized access and theft.”

Wyndham and LabMD are not necessarily inconsistent with one another. Rather, read together, the cases show how the individualized circumstances of a security incident informs whether there has been an unfair practice and, thus, the scope of the FTC’s regulatory power to impose remedial measures. While Wyndham affirmed the FTC’s power to regulate data security, and LabMD may appear to constrain it, both decisions are driven by the circumstances of each case’s individual incident rather than a fundamental schism in the courts’ interpretations of the FTC’s unfairness authority. Rather than base its ultimate ruling on the FTC’s unfairness authority, the Eleventh Circuit in LabMD limited its opinion to the enforceability of the FTC’s order. Although the Court did not adopt a negligence standard to establish an unfair act or practice for purposes of FTC enforcement, it was willing to entertain it and “assume arguendo that the Commission is correct” that there was an unfair practice in the FTC’s allegations. LabMD’s specific lesson is that the FTC may not enforce a comprehensive and, yet, indeterminate security program that far exceeds the scope of the specific facts of the case. The FTC thus could not enforce a comprehensive program against a defunct company on the basis of a single data compromise unknowingly caused by a misbehaving employee. But, particularly when read with Wyndham Worldwide, the FTC may yet take appropriate action depending on the specific facts presented by the individual case.

While the FTC may need to draft more tightly drawn orders in the cyber space, it remains one of the few federal agencies providing meaningful cyber enforcement, particularly outside the healthcare and financial services arenas. If the FTC is to maintain a positive posture in the cyber arena (absent congressional action or other fundamental changes), it must strike a balance that specifically addresses the circumstance giving rise to the dispute, while at the same time avoiding orders that pinpoint the problematic behavior so narrowly that they lose value over time, particularly given the ever-changing technology landscape. While it may be more expedient for the FTC to impose wide-ranging, comprehensive, “reasonable” cybersecurity remedies, the Eleventh Circuit’s holding in LabMD serves notice that should the FTC reach too broadly, such orders are likely a luxury the FTC will no longer be afforded under ordinary circumstances.

There are other avenues that are potentially available to the FTC, even without fundamental congressional action changing its investigative or remedial powers. Indeed, there is broad agreement that the FTC should avoid orders that provide a roadmap to vulnerabilities or adopt technology-specific or other pinpoint remedies that are ill-equipped to deal with evolving risks. As an alternative, the FTC might reference third-party standards, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Cybersecurity Standards or Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, in an attempt to balance these demands. It might also require a third-party assessment and then consider and approve sufficiently specific remedial measures based on the findings of that assessment. These and other avenues may remain available to the FTC, despite the Eleventh Circuit decision in LabMD, which many have mistakenly described as the end of the FTC’s presence in cyber-related enforcement actions.

Cybersecurity, and particularly the FTC’s regulation of it, continues to be an evolving area with sometimes subtle distinctions requiring discerning judgment. We will continue to update you and look forward to working with you by providing effective and proactive advice to assist you in navigating the changing landscape of court decisions and federal regulations.



* Larry Sommerfeld is the former chief of the Appeals & Legal Advice Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia.

Download PDF of Advisory

[View source.]

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Alston & Bird | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Alston & Bird
Contact
more
less

Alston & Bird on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.