Legal Alert: Supreme Court Holds That FLSA's Antiretaliation Provision Includes Oral Complaints

FordHarrison
Contact

In a 6-2 decision issued March 22, the U.S. Supreme Court held that oral complaints are covered by the antiretaliation provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), resolving a split of authority among the federal appeals courts on this issue. See Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.

Kasten sued his former employer for retaliation under the FLSA, claiming he was terminated because of his oral complaints about the location of the company's time clocks. The time clocks were located in an area between where the employees put on and took off their protective equipment and the area where they carried out their assigned tasks. In a companion case, a federal court held that the placement of these time clocks was a violation of the FLSA because the employer did not compensate employees for time they spent putting on and taking off their protective equipment.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

FordHarrison
Contact
more
less

FordHarrison on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.