Legally Yours: Establishing and Leveraging Your Role as a ‘Friend of the Court’

by Blattel Communications

[co-author: *Jason P. Steed]

The following article appeared in the fall 2015 edition of the Public Relations Society of America’s (PRSA) magazine The Public Relations Strategist.

While the legal profession and public relations may appear at first glance to be two disciplines with little overlap, in fact the opposite is true. Lawyers and PR professionals are both advocates trusted to champion the interests of clients. The difference is in the methods employed. And though a PR professional will never represent a client in court, he or she can pair with an attorney or legal department to develop, file and publicize an amicus brief, which can help to advance a client’s interests both in and out of court.

Taking sides in the case

Generally, litigation involves two “parties” fighting over a legal question. Did the company breach the contract or not? Did the driver cause the accident or not? Do same-sex couples have the right to marry or not?

Sometimes cases involve legal questions of interest to others who are not parties. For example, while a lawsuit over a breach of contract might not matter to anyone other than the two parties to the contract, a lawsuit over the constitutional right for same-sex couples to marry is of great importance to many individuals, organizations and corporations who are not parties to the lawsuit. Entities that are not directly involved in a lawsuit can formally express their opinions on a legal issue by filing an amicus brief.

Amicus curiae is Latin for “friend of the court.” Amicus briefs tell the court whatever an individual, organization or corporation thinks the court needs to consider before it makes a decision. These briefs can usually be filed at any level of litigation, in either state court or federal court, but most commonly at the appellate level and most prominently at the U.S. Supreme Court.

Typically, an amicus takes a side in the case. For example, in a lawsuit over a product that injured a consumer, organizations seeking to protect business interests might file an amicus brief supporting the manufacturer’s position, while organizations seeking to protect consumer interests might file an amicus brief supporting the injured person’s position. Similarly, in a case involving the free-speech rights of an individual who posted a tirade online, Internet service providers and other Web-based companies might file briefs telling the court which way they think the case should go.

In addition, sometimes there are amici (plural of amicus) who choose not to take a side — they just want the court to have certain information or to consider something important that was not mentioned in the parties’ briefs.

Advocating for an outcome

Beyond advocating for a particular legal outcome, serving as a “friend of the court” can also be leveraged to establish an organization’s position and credibility on a key issue; to promote its executives or counsel as thought leaders on a topic; or to provide the backbone for a variety of PR tactics.

After several years of high-profile cases at the U.S. Supreme Court, today’s plugged-in and empowered news consumer is more aware of and interested in high-level court proceedings than ever before. With widespread social media use and advocacy groups able to sprout up overnight, well-crafted, accessible and visible amicus filings can serve as key advocacy tools.

Commissioning and filing an amicus brief in the right case can be an ideal jumping-off point for thought leadership activities on a given issue. Companies can promote their executives or counsel as thought leaders on a given topic and leverage the content across multiple vehicles.

Developing the messages

As an example of the messaging that can be developed through an amicus brief, consider the issue of the “supervisor” liability rule before the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013 in Vance v. Ball State.

In Vance, the court considered whether the definition of a “supervisor,” as it had been established in past decisions, applied to all individuals empowered by an employer to assign and supervise work — an expansive definition of the term — or was limited only to individuals who can assign and supervise work and who also can “hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer or discipline.” Clarity on this definition was needed in the context of a sexual harassment lawsuit.

Five different nonprofit organizations, working with colleges and universities across the nation — all of which would be directly impacted by the decision — came together to speak in one voice in an amicus brief filed at the Supreme Court.

While the brief argued specific points of law, the message from a PR perspective was fairly straightforward:

This is a critically important issue for the approximately 4,500 colleges and universities in the U.S. As argued in our brief, we strongly believe that a more narrow definition of “supervisor,” consistent with prior legal rulings, is wholly appropriate and enhances the ability of institutions of higher education to focus their scarce resources on the screening, training and monitoring of supervisors rather than on litigation.

The group’s message was reinforced with a press release and related outreach, positioning key members of the group as sources for comment on Vance. And the members’ role as amici was touted as a credential, making the spokespeople ideally suited to provide a higher-education perspective on the case.

Elements of the brief were also leveraged in opinion pieces aimed at various constituents, including the higher-education community, HR and legal professionals, and business audiences, who also stood to gain by supporting the narrower definition of a supervisor.

Further, the legal process itself provided many timely news pegs. The filing of the amicus brief, the closing of oral arguments and the ruling itself all offered opportunities to talk about the issues and the implications of the court’s decision.

Utilizing opportunities

The amicus brief is a powerful tool and an underutilized opportunity for PR professionals to work with attorneys and legal departments. These “friend of the court” filings are important not just for nonprofit and advocacy groups but also for for-profit corporations whose motivations are more economic than social. For instance, it was reported in the Huffington Post that 379 companies supported same-sex marriage in the recent U.S. Supreme Court matter Obergefell v. Hodges. For these companies, because they do business across multiple states and were consequently using different employment handbooks throughout their organizations, the decision was economically material.

According to NPR, there was a record 148 amicus briefs filed overall in Obergefell, a number that speaks to the public’s engagement with the court system. (The previous high-water mark was 136 briefs, filed in the 2013 Obamacare case.)

It’s also important to note that there is a specific process for filing amicus briefs, which is why it is important to work closely with legal counsel. In most courts, an amicus has to get the consent of the parties or the approval of the court before it can file its brief. And there might be a hard filing deadline.

PR professionals often groan when they’re advised to filter campaign elements through the legal department, but the two disciplines can and should collaborate on amicus briefs to ensure maximum exposure and to deepen working relationships.

As the PR role continues to evolve, it is essential that forward-thinking professionals look for new synergies. And sometimes old tradition-steeped ways offer opportunities and credibility that can enhance a multifaceted thought leadership campaign.

*Jason P. Steed is an appellate attorney at Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP in Dallas. 

Copyright 2015 by The Public Relations Strategist. Reprinted with permission from the Public Relations Society of America (

Written by:

Blattel Communications

Blattel Communications on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.