Lessons From 2012 About California Appellate Procedure

by Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Appellate courts invariably face lawyers who fail to follow the rules that govern appeals. Learned Hand famously threw a 150-page brief over the bench and onto counsel's table after exclaiming that he would not read it because it was too long. Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan had penned the brief several years before his appointment to the Court. Even the most celebrated attorneys sometimes fail to follow appellate procedural rules, a deviation from which can signal the end of an appeal. The California Court of Appeal issued a handful of decisions at the end of 2012 that provide helpful reminders about what is important when filing an appeal.

Briefing: Do Your Own Work 
The Court of Appeal is not obligated to research the legal arguments that parties advance on appeal, nor is it required to sift through the record to uncover evidence to support a party's factual contentions. In Piechuta v. Hernandez, No. A132220 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2012 nonpub. opn.), the court affirmed terminating sanctions and a default judgment against defendant and appellant who had grown trees in her yard that obstructed her neighbor's ocean view. The court came down hard on appellant because her brief failed to cite portions of the record or pertinent legal authority to support each assertion. The court warned: "When an appellant's brief makes no reference to the pages of the record where a point can be found, an appellate court need not search through the record in an effort to discover the point purportedly made. We can simply deem the contention to lack foundation and . . . be forfeited."

The court reached the same conclusion in another case one day after deciding Piechuta. In Eannarino v. Martin, No. D060063 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 18, 2012 nonpub. opn.), defendant and appellant challenged the trial court's grant of a petition for a restraining order against her. Appellant's opening brief was devoid of citations to legal authority or the record. The Court of Appeal held that any unsupported contention was deemed waived.

Both decisions should cause California appellate attorneys to proceed with caution. First, the Court of Appeal was tough on both appellants despite their pro per status. It follows that counsels' failure to cite factual and legal authority would be met with even less sympathy. Second, the court treated such procedural deficiencies as a litmus test for whether the court needed to substantively evaluate the issues presented on appeal. In other words, counsel must adhere to the procedural rules that govern appeals if they expect their legal theories to be adjudicated on the merits.

Mootness: Cover All Your Bases 
Similarly, in Labtis v. CitiMortgage, No. H037248 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2012 nonpub. opn.), the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal without reaching the merits. Appellant, past due on her mortgage payments to the tune of nearly $20,000, obtained a temporary restraining order staying the sale of her home, and an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. In the action that followed, Labtis sought to prevent foreclosure of her home. But the trial court denied her request for an injunction, sustained CitiMortgage's demurrer to the complaint, and entered a judgment of dismissal.

The Court of Appeal reasoned that the appeal was moot because the trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend, and a preliminary injunction cannot issue when a complaint fails to state a cause of action. Nevertheless, appellant could have invoked the court's inherent power to retain the otherwise moot appeal by briefing arguments designed to trigger the court's discretion, including: (1) the issue underpinning the case is one of broad public importance, (2) there is a likelihood that the controversy will recur, or (3) a material question remains for the court to adjudicate. Unfortunately, absent effective briefing (as was the case in Labtis), the Court of Appeal was left with no option but to dismiss.

Timeliness: Watch the Clock 
The notice of appeal is the document that triggers appellate jurisdiction. In California, a notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days from service of notice of entry of judgment (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.104(a)) or no more than thirty days from service of an order denying post-trial motions (rule 8.108(b)). In Steele v. West Coast Metals, No. A136768 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2012 nonpub. opn.), defendant filed a notice of appeal 55 days after notice of entry of an amended judgment. Although a party generally has sixty days to file the notice of appeal from service of entry of judgment, appellant learned a hard lesson in Steele.

The appellate clock does not stop ticking unless the amended judgment involves a substantial change in the parties' rights such that a party could not have raised the appeal earlier. (See, e.g., Dakota Payphone, LLC v. Alcaraz (2011 nonpub. opn.) 192 Cal.App.4th 493, 504 (even a four-million dollar reduction in a judgment does not constitute a substantial modification).) In other words, if a party can obtain its desired relief from judgment pre-amendment, that party must not wait for an amendment before filing a notice of appeal because the clock will run.

Ultimately, an appeal may very well survive the foregoing errors. On the other hand, counsels' failure to comport appeals to procedural rules can result in anything from a judicial jab in an opinion to an outright dismissal. Fortunately, appellate attorneys can ensure that their appeals are evaluated on the merits by merely paying attention to the rules.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.