Result-Oriented Claims and Section 101: Claiming the How
Daniel Kiang & Brandon Cormier
Result-oriented claims were found ineligible under 35 U.S.C ? 101 because the claims did not describe how the claimed results were achieved or how they embodied any specific technological improvement.
Read More
Conceptual Similarity Does Not Go Arm in Arm With Substantial Similarity
Inzer C. Ni & Zachery Rufa
Functional aspects of a design must be separated out when analyzing whether an ordinary observer would find two designs similar, even if those functional aspects result in conceptual similarity.
Read More
Wireless TV Is So Main“stream”
Brian C. Barnes & Bailey R. Arenberg
A winning claim construction isn’t always enough to overcome § 101.
Read More
In Law360 Article, Jeremiah Helm and Sean Murray Explore Role of Expert Testimony in Patent Litigation
Jeremiah S. Helm, Ph.D. & Sean Murray
In the latest installment of their Law360 series on recent noteworthy Federal Circuit decisions, Knobbe Martens partners Jeremiah Helm and Sean Murray cover the court’s ruling in Barry v. DePuy Syntheses Cos.
Read More
[View source.]
