Maryland attorney general secures $1.05M settlement with title insurance companies

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

On January 14, Maryland’s attorney general announced that the state’s Consumer Protection Division (CPD) entered into a settlement resolving allegations that several joint venture title agency companies formed between a title agency and real estate agents or brokers unlawfully paid fees to those agents and brokers in exchange for referring consumers for title insurance.

The CPD alleged these joint ventures were created specifically to facilitate referral payments, in violation of the federal RESPA and the Maryland Real Estate Settlements Act (MRESPA), which prohibit giving anything of value for referrals related to title insurance. The agency further alleged that those violations of RESPA and MRESPA constitute unfair and deceptive trade practices proscribed by the Maryland Consumer Protection Act (CPA). As part of the settlement, all joint venture companies involved must be dissolved, and the formation of new joint ventures for the purpose of making unlawful referral payments is prohibited. The joint venture companies denied any wrongdoing and maintained that they were fully compliant with the CPA, MRESPA, and RESPA, including satisfaction of the RESPA statutory safe harbor for affiliated business arrangements set forth in 12 U.S.C. § 2607(c)(4).

Under the terms of the agreement, the companies must pay $850,000 in restitution to Maryland consumers and make an additional $200,000 payment to the CPD for consumer protection purposes. The settlement included a requirement that the CPD terminate its investigation into the companies and their real estate members upon full compliance with the settlement and stated that any future violations of the Maryland CPA based on similar conduct would be treated as a second violation under state law.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide