Massachusetts Creates First-In-Nation Recklessness Standard For Claims Against Brand-Name Drug Manufacturers By Users Of Generics

by Foley Hoag LLP
Contact

In a case of first impression, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) held in Rafferty v. Merck & Co., No. SJC-12347 (Mar. 16, 2018), that the manufacturer of a brand-name prescription drug can be liable for reckless failure to warn a user of the drug’s generic equivalent.

Plaintiff allegedly experienced sexual dysfunction during and after discontinuing use of generic finasteride, the equivalent of Merck’s Proscar®.  Plaintiff sued Merck, alleging its warning of the risk of sexual dysfunction failed to disclose the side effect could continue after stopping the drug.  Although plaintiff never used Proscar®, he argued it was foreseeable to Merck that failing to update its warning would harm users of  generic equivalents, since under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) generic drugs are required to use the same warning label as the brand-name drug. 

After the trial court dismissed plaintiff’s claim, the SJC granted direct appellate review to decide whether Massachusetts would recognize the doctrine of “innovator liability,” under which the manufacturer of the original brand-name, i.e., innovator, drug can be held liable for harm to users of generic equivalents.  The question is of considerable significance because the United States Supreme Court has ruled that the FDCA preempts failure-to-warn claims against manufacturers of generic drugs, as they are unable to control the content of their warning labels. Thus, absent innovator liability, users of generic drugs—roughly 90% of the prescription drug market—have no recourse for harms caused by those products.

In its opinion, the SJC acknowledged the conflicting public policy concerns affecting innovator liability.  Allowing innovator liability under a negligence standard would create “broad latitude to bring a failure to warn claim and great difficulty in defeating it before trial.  As a result, brand-name manufacturers faced with failure to warn claims would bear the significant cost not only of compensating injured consumers, but also of litigating their claims, meritorious or not.”  Moreover, such costs would be unusually burdensome because once a generic is introduced, the branded manufacturer’s market share typically falls to about 10%, yet it would be required to bear the liability and litigation costs of the entire market.  Despite these effects, the SJC asserted it was “difficult to accurately assess whether, and to what extent, this would have a chilling effect on [pharmaceutical] innovation.”

On the other hand, recognizing innovator liability “would have undeniable benefits,” including making drugs safer by giving branded manufacturers incentives to diligently update their labels even after generic equivalents were introduced, and affording generic users a remedy for harms caused by the drugs.

Ultimately, the SJC attempted to balance the conflicting policy concerns by holding that “a brand-name manufacturer that controls the contents of the label on a generic drug owes a duty to consumers of that generic drug not to act in reckless disregard of an unreasonable risk of death or grave bodily injury.”  The court distinguished recklessness from mere negligence on two grounds:  the “reckless conduct must be intended,” and it “must involve a substantially greater risk than is required for ordinary negligence.”  Thus there must be a “conscious choice of . . . action, either with knowledge of the serious danger . . . or . . . of facts which would disclose this danger to any reasonable man.”  And there must be “a high degree of probability that substantial harm will result,” or “the harm must be a probable consequence” of defendant’s conduct.

Applying its new standard, the SJC vacated the dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint and remanded to afford him the opportunity to plead a recklessness claim.  The court did affirm dismissal of plaintiff’s unfair or deceptive practices claim under Mass. Gen. L. ch. 93A, since Merck’s labeling conduct did not occur in the course of any “trade or commerce” with respect to a plaintiff who did not use Merck’s drug.

Notably, neither party argued for the recklessness standard recognized by the SJC or had any opportunity to brief the appropriateness of that standard.  While the court likely believed it was creating only a limited avenue for innovator liability claims, plaintiffs’ counsel can be expected to allege recklessness in virtually every case, and this prospect is heightened by Rafferty’s considerable ambiguities.  Thus while the court defined recklessness as involving a “high degree of probability” of harm, or its being “a probable consequence,” the court also spoke of an “unreasonable risk,” the language of mere negligence.  And although the court insisted recklessness requires risk of “death or grave bodily injury,” the court permitted plaintiff to re-plead even though his claim involved a continuation of sexual dysfunction about which he had been warned.

Under Rafferty, brand-name manufacturers should expect an increase in litigation in Massachusetts.  In light of the opinion’s ambiguities, trial courts may also be reluctant to dismiss such claims at the pleading stage, forcing manufacturers to incur litigation costs at least through discovery and summary judgment, if not trial.

It is unclear whether other jurisdictions will now follow Massachusetts’ lead.  Until now, state and federal courts had overwhelmingly rejected innovator liability.  The doctrine had been accepted by the high courts of just two states, California and Alabama, and the latter result was promptly reversed by the state legislature.  But claims are pending before several courts, including the West Virginia Supreme Court, and the ostensible “middle ground” offered by Rafferty may prove tempting to some of those tribunals.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP
Contact
more
less

Foley Hoag LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.