May 2012: Class Action Litigation Update: Data Breach Class Actions—Courts Treat Theft Differently From Mere Loss

by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

Data Breach Class Actions—Courts Treat Theft Differently From Mere Loss: Any company that stores or processes consumers’ personal information is at risk of suffering a data breach—and, potentially, defending a class action lawsuit. Class actions based on data breaches are increasingly common and attractive to plaintiffs’ lawyers because of the enormous class sizes that often result from a single breach. But despite their favor with the plaintiffs’ bar, some defendants can obtain dismissals at the pleading stage due to absence of an injury in fact resulting from the breach.

The Ninth Circuit has held that increased risk of identity theft resulting from a data breach establishes Article III standing. Krottner v. Starbucks Corp., 628 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2010). Krottner involved a laptop stolen from Starbucks that contained the names, addresses, and social security numbers of about 97,000 Starbucks employees. Although several plaintiffs had not alleged they had suffered identity theft or any other financial harm, someone had tried to open a bank account with one of the plaintiff’s information. Under these circumstances, the court held increased risk of future harm sufficed to confer standing. Id. at 1143.

The Seventh Circuit has come to the same conclusion. In a case involving a “sophisticated, intentional and malicious” data breach, the court held that the increased risk of future harm resulting from breach established standing. Pisciotta v. Old Nat’l Bancorp, 499 F.3d 629, 634 (7th Cir. 2007).

The Third Circuit, however, recently drew a line between intentional breaches and mere loss of information. In Reilly v. Ceridian Corp., 664 F.3d 38 (3d Cir. 2011), the court held that the plaintiffs would only be injured if a series of speculative harms actually came true:

          "Appellants’ contentions rely on speculation that the hacker: (1) read, copied, and   
          understood their personal information; (2) intends to commit future criminal acts by  
          misusing the information; and (3) is able to use such information to the detriment of  
          Appellants by making unauthorized transactions in Appellants’ names. Unless and until  
          these conjectures come true, Appellants have not suffered any injury; there has been no
          misuse of the information, and thus, no harm."

Id. at 42. The court distinguished Krottner and Pisciotta, saying that the threats in those cases were “significantly more ‘imminent’ and ‘certainly impending’ than the alleged harm here.” Id. at 44. The court reasoned that, “[h]ere, there is no evidence that the intrusion was intentional or malicious,” and the plaintiffs “alleged no misuse, and therefore, no injury.” Id. Cf. Lambert v. Hartman, 517 F.3d 433, 437 (6th Cir. 2008) (stating that although risk of future identity theft was “somewhat ‘hypothetical’ and ‘conjectural,’ [plaintiff’s] actual financial injuries are sufficient to meet the injury-in-fact requirement”).

The Ninth Circuit also recently embraced this distinction in Whitaker v. Health Net of Cal., Inc., No. CIV S-11-0910 KJM, 2012 WL 174961 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2012). In Whitaker, Quinn Emanuel successfully dismissed a data-breach class action involving allegedly lost hard drives that contained 800,000 California residents’ personal and medical information. There was no evidence of hacking, theft, or misuse of the plaintiffs’ personal information.

Quinn Emanuel argued that mere loss of data—as opposed to hacking or theft—was insufficient to establish standing. Judge Mueller of the Eastern District of California accepted our argument. Because “Krottner . . . arose from the theft of information, not its loss,” the court held that it did not control the outcome. Whitaker, 2012 WL 174961, at *2. The plaintiffs failed to “explain how the loss here has actually harmed them or threatens to harm them,” and so the court held that “[a]ny harm stemming from their loss thus is precisely the type of conjectural and hypothetical harm that is insufficient to allege standing.” Id.

Thus, in cases of lost rather than stolen data, Whitaker is obviously extremely helpful precedent. But even when plaintiffs allege someone has hacked or stolen their data, the Third Circuit’s decision in Reilly may still provide a basis for dismissal where there are no allegations of concrete harm to any plaintiff.

Written by:

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.