McNees Litigation News - July 2019

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
Contact

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC

SCOTUS Class Action Update: Consumers Get Another Bite at Apple Profits for Alleged Antitrust Violations

By Rachel R. Hadrick

On May 14th, in an opinion authored by Justice Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court of the United States gave consumers the opportunity to proceed with their antitrust class action against Apple based on the commissions assessed to app developers for iOS apps purchased through the App Store. The Court solidified the bright-line test, which Justice Gorsuch (writing the dissent) deemed a test of “privity” between the direct purchaser and the alleged antitrust violator.

Anyone who has an iPhone or iPad has interacted with its App Store. Apple offers the App Store as the exclusive platform through which iOS users can purchase applications from Apple and third-party developers. Apple charges third-party developers a set percentage of the cost of each app as a commission for providing the platform for customers to purchase both the applications offered in the App store and any features, services, or digital content purchased within the apps. Apple takes payment from the customer through the App Store, then remits the balance to the developer after it deducts the commission.

In 2011, multiple consumers filed class actions alleging that Apple’s practices violate federal antitrust laws. The key to the claims of the consumers in Pepper v. Apple: Apple’s practice of limiting purchases of iOS apps to its own platform allows Apple to charge a commission higher than what it could charge in a competitive market, which violates the Sherman Act.

Apple argued on all levels of appeal that the consumers did not have standing as a direct purchaser required by Section 4 of the Clayton Act, which provides for a civil action for damages for those injured by violations of the Sherman Act, and as interpreted by Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois (U.S. 1977). Apple relied on the fact that it charged the commission to the developer and left the developer in control of the ultimate price to be paid by the customer. Per the standard set forth in Illinois Brick, only direct purchasers have standing against an alleged antitrust violator, and participants downstream in the vertical chain of commerce were not entitled to pursue claims based on pass-on costs for indirect harms. Apple claimed that, because the developer set the final cost to the customer, and Apple charged the commission to the developer, there was no guarantee that the customer bore the total cost of the commission, and thus was not a direct purchaser. In Illinois Brick, the state of Illinois, who claimed that it was harmed when it received higher bids for construction from general contractors, could not sue the brick manufacturer for price manipulation because it was downstream in the chain of commerce and not a “direct purchaser.” The Supreme Court rejected the state’s argument that higher bids from contractors gave the state standing to challenge the alleged price manipulation of the bricks. Only the entity who bought the product from the alleged antitrust violator was a direct purchaser who bore the entire cost of the price manipulation. As the product moved down the chain of commerce, it would become less certain as to which purchaser suffered the entire portion of the price attributable to the violative conduct.

The district court which originally considered the motion to dismiss the consumers’ action claimed to apply the Illinois Brick standard when it dismissed the action on the grounds that the consumer plaintiffs were not direct purchasers under the Clayton Act. The district court reasoned that since the price paid by the plaintiffs was set by the individual developers rather than Apple, the customer was not a direct purchaser under the Clayton Act. The district court further justified its decision on the grounds that the plaintiffs would need to prove that each developer would lower the price of its app sufficiently to account for the entirety of the commission in a competitive market to prove that the customer suffered an injury as a result of Apple’s allegedly anticompetitive conduct. The Ninth Circuit reversed, finding the consumers were direct purchasers with Apple.

The Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit, finding that both the plain language of the Clayton Act and prior precedent permits consumers to sue a monopolist retailer as “any person” injured by an antitrust violator. Justice Kavanaugh criticized Apple’s argument that the party who sets the price is the only party whose conduct directly affects the consumer. Whether the retailer makes a profit through a price markup after purchasing product from the supplier or charges a commission to the supplier, the injury suffered by the consumer as a result of the monopolistic behavior of the retailer is the same. Yet under Apple’s theory, if a developer agreed with Apple to sell an app for a certain amount, Apple would have been shielded from liability from the consumer, even where the consumer may not have knowledge of the profit arrangement. The Court chose to ignore any distinction between systems controlled by “brokerage . . . and purchaser-resellers.” That distinction would allow retailers to avoid antitrust liability by structuring the transaction such that, what was once the wholesale price remitted to the supplier, would now be crafted as the retail price (minus the commission) remitted to the supplier.

Justice Kavanaugh also rejected the notion that Apple’s “who sets the price” approach better promoted the policies underlying the Illinois Brick direct-purchaser rule: 1) more effective enforcement of antitrust laws; 2) avoiding complicated damages calculations; and 3) eliminating duplicative damages. Denying consumers who are immediate purchasers the opportunity to sue a retailer would not promote effective enforcement of antitrust laws. Secondly, Justice Kavanaugh claimed that assessing damages in retail markup cases could be just as complicated as in retail commission claims (although not providing any examples).

With respect to the third policy of avoiding duplicative damages, Justice Kavanaugh distinguished the factual scenario in Illinois Brick, where the manufacturer at the beginning of the stream of commerce marked up its price for products sold to various buyers, who then sold the product down the chain to contractors, who then may have passed on all or part of the markup to end customers. In that instance, without the direct-purchaser rule, the distributors, general contractors, and the end customer could all have claimed they incurred all or part of the cost of the same markup, when in reality, it was only the initial purchaser who could account for the markup in entirety. Here, we know that Apple is getting the entire price of the app, including the entire amount of the commission, directly from the customer. Thus, the same concern of duplicative damages would not inhibit the Court’s use of the bright-line test.

The Apple opinion rectifies inconsistent application of the direct-purchaser rule by the Eighth Circuit. In Campos v. Ticketmaster Corp. (8th Cir. 1997), the court dismissed a consumer antitrust class action for price fixing related to service and handling fees for ticket distribution services based on the direct-purchaser rule. The Eighth Circuit ignored the fact that the defendant charged the service fees directly to the consumer, separate and apart from the price of the ticket set by the venue. The Campos court focused on the fact that the original agreement to use the defendant’s services as the exclusive means of selling tickets is between the distributor and the event venue. Thus, the Campos court posited that the venue, not the customer, suffered the true injury, in that but for the defendant’s anticompetitive conduct, the venue would be able to charge the same total price to the customer and collect its own service fees. The Campos court claimed that the Third Circuit similarly reasoned against rejecting “billing arrangements” as the test for direct-purchaser status by citing the Third Circuit’s statement that a separate charge for a service does not make the consumer a direct purchaser of the service. The Third Circuit, however, merely noted that a separate charge to a consumer collected by a third-party as a pass-through for costs paid by the third-party for the defendant’s services did not make the consumer a direct purchaser of the defendant’s services. In Campos, however, the consumer paid the delivery fee directly to the alleged antitrust violator. Under Apple, the consumers in Campos would now likely be able to pursue their antitrust claims.

As Apple noted in its petition for certiorari, the Court’s position on this matter has important implications for consignment and agency platforms—even for the developers whose apps can be purchased in the App Store, but which provide goods and services under a similar business model. The Apple decision may cause new and old developers to act with caution when creating platforms to connect consumers with third parties for the provision of goods and services for compensation. There are many examples of platforms which have enjoyed much success by providing consignment/agency services in apps, and many small developers attempt to pierce the market each week. For some, the delivery fees are expressly separate from the goods or services provided. For others, the consumer does not see the commission charged to those entities which utilize the platform to market their goods and services. In both scenarios, there are many platforms that collect the total from the customer and remit the balance after commission to the business. In both cases, these platforms are now susceptible to antitrust claims brought by consumers.

The Apple decision could also offer indirect benefit to those business who utilize consignment and agency platforms to obtain business from consumers, in that they can rely on consumer litigation to break the hold of domineering platforms without having to participate as a party in the litigation. Moreover, the Court implied in Apple that its ruling did not necessarily prohibit a developer from also asserting an antitrust claim for its lost profits against Apple on the basis that it acts as a monopsony by limiting the market through which it can distribute its apps to one buyer (Apple). That is to say, the Court left opportunity to bite the Apple from both ends.

Jury “Grills” Walmart: Five Takeaways from the $95.5 Million BACKYARD Trademark Verdict

By Emily Doan

In 2019, a California jury found Walmart liable for $95.5 million in damages for infringing the BACKYARD trademark of a smaller retailer, Variety, Inc. Variety operates over 300 discount stores and sued Walmart for adopting a BACKYARD GRILL brand. Variety claims it had been using BACKYARD for lawn, garden, and barbecue equipment since 1993.

In October of 2018, a jury found Walmart willfully infringed Variety’s BACKYARD GRILL trademark, but the determination of damages was left to a second jury trial that concluded on February 12. The second jury found Walmart liable for $45.5 million in royalties and $50 million in Walmart’s profits from sales of Walmart’s BACKYARD-branded products. On February 19, the judge overseeing the case approved the jury’s $95.5 million verdict.

While most trademark infringement cases settle, this monumental verdict illustrates important points about brand protection and risk avoidance. Here are our top five takeaways from the case:

  1. Trademark screening is essential and inexpensive for long-term success. Before using or applying to register a trademark, it is crucial to engage trademark counsel to screen proposed trademarks and identify risks to your use and/or registration of the proposed trademarks. When you compare a couple thousand dollars to $95.5 million in damages, common sense demands you clear your mark and invest in the long-term security of your brand.
  2. Do not ignore the advice of your trademark counsel. The evidence presented in the Variety v. Walmart case suggested that Walmart blatantly ignored “repeated warnings from its own legal counsel” to not use the BACKYARD GRILL trademark. This fact contributed to a district court judge’s finding in 2016 that Walmart willfully infringed Variety’s trademark. (That ruling was overturned on appeal and sent to a jury, but the jury also concluded that Walmart had willfully infringed.) Involve trademark counsel at the beginning of the marketing team’s creative process. If you disagree with trademark counsel, get a second opinion, but do not deliberately ignore your attorneys’ advice when serious risks are identified.
  3. Do not ignore third party claims of intellectual property infringement. If you receive a cease and desist letter or other correspondence from an intellectual property owner or counsel that alleges you are infringing someone’s rights, do not ignore it. Even though Walmart is a retail behemoth, it ignored Variety’s claims to priority over the BACKYARD trademark. If you are accused of infringing a third party’s intellectual property rights, engage intellectual property counsel to discuss strategy and determine an appropriate response to the allegations.
  4. Stronger trademarks are easier to enforce. More distinctive trademarks receive broader protection. Plenty of third parties use the word BACKYARD alone or in combination with other elements as a trademark for barbecue related goods or services. For example, BACKYARD LIVING is registered for use with barbecue, charcoal, and gas and electric grills, and BACKYARD PRO is registered for use with barbecue smokers, charcoal grills, and gas grills. Walmart may have justified its use of BACKYARD GRILL by arguing rampant third party use of BACKYARD in connection with similar goods and the addition of GRILL to avoid likelihood of confusion with BACKYARD alone. We can only imagine whether this case would have settled if Variety were using a stronger (i.e., arbitrary or fanciful) trademark for its lawn, garden, and barbecue equipment with Walmart adopting that stronger trademark for related goods. Trademark counsel can advise you on the strength of your proposed trademark in the marketplace and whether third parties are already using the trademark or using common elements of the trademark.
  5. A plaintiff may recover an infringer’s profits. In determining defendant’s profits, the plaintiff only needs to show defendant’s sales. The burden then shifts to the defendant to offset costs and deductions. Here, the jury determined Variety was entitled to $50 million from Walmart’s profits on BACKYARD GRILL products. The takeaway here is that exposure can be significant if an infringing mark is used liberally on goods sold. Other remedies for trademark infringement include injunctive relief, damages, costs, and attorneys’ fees. Damage awards may be enhanced upon a finding of willful infringement.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
Contact
more
less

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.