‘Me Too’ Coverage Implications For Employers

by Carlton Fields

When an employer negligently supervises an employee who commits separate acts of sexual harassment against three different co-workers on separate occasions, how many “occurrences” are there under a standard commercial general liability policy? The Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, considered this question in Scott Fetzer Co. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., No. 16 CV 1570 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 18, 2017), and concluded that the answer is three.

Three Times the Harassment

In 2015, three women filed suit against the policyholder, the Scott Fetzer Company (“Fetzer”) in Missouri state court alleging they were subjected to sexual harassment and assault by a male co-worker, John Field (“Field”), while working for Fetzer as door-to-door vacuum salespersons. The three plaintiffs in the Missouri case alleged that their injuries were the direct and proximate result of conduct by Fetzer. Their first claim, for fraudulent misrepresentation, alleged that Fetzer was vicariously liable for Field’s false promises in inducing the plaintiffs to work with him. Their second claim, for fraudulent concealment, alleged theories of direct and vicarious liability; the direct liability allegations were that the Fetzer defendants failed to inform the plaintiffs of Field’s criminal history, sexually deviant propensities, and sexually deviant activities with other employees, and that he was forbidden from selling vacuums door-to-door without supervision because he was a sex offender. Their third claim, for negligence, alleged that Fetzer negligently hired, retained, and supervised Field.

Fetzer was insured under two policies providing general liability insurance issued by Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”), with identical material terms (collectively, “Policies”). Policy 1 covered the time period January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2013. Policy 2 covered the time period January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2014. Zurich accepted coverage under the Policies for the Missouri case, which ultimately resulted in settlement. Zurich treated each plaintiff’s claim as a separate occurrence, applying a new deductible to each of the three settlements reached in the Missouri case. Only one of the settlements met or exceeded the deductible, and Zurich paid a portion of that settlement. Zurich did not reimburse Fetzer for amounts Fetzer paid toward the other two settlements.

Equals Three Occurrences

In the district court litigation that followed, Fetzer claimed Zurich’s application of three deductibles, instead of one deductible, to the settlements reached with the plaintiffs in the Missouri case was in breach of the Policies. The district court disagreed.

The Policies defined “occurrence” as:

an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions.

The deductible endorsement defined “occurrence” as follows:

For any coverage described in the Schedule to which the each “occurrence” basis applies, to all sums payable for other than “ALAE” as the result of an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same harmful conditions, regardless of the number of persons or organizations who sustain damages or to whom sums are payable because of that “occurrence.”

Fetzer argued, unsuccessfully, that the Missouri lawsuit and settlements represented a single “occurrence” of purported negligence by it in connection with the hiring, retention, and supervision of Fields. The district court concluded there was no single “occurrence” that was the proximate cause of all of the Missouri case plaintiffs’ injuries. Rather, the claims in the Missouri case showed that the negligence of Fetzer with respect to each plaintiff constitutes three separate occurrences under the Policies. The Missouri plaintiffs contended that because of Fetzer’s acts of negligence, each plaintiff was assaulted under different circumstances, at different locations, at different times, and sometimes in different policy years.

The district court, however, granted summary judgment in Zurich’s favor based on Ohio case law that provides:

When a liability insurance policy defines an ‘occurrence’ as an ‘accident,’ a negligent act committed by an insured that is predicated on the commission of an intentional tort by another person, e.g., negligent hiring or negligent supervision, qualifies as an ‘occurrence.’

Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. White, 913 N.E. 2d 426 (Ohio 2009). The court reasoned that the intentional torts the Missouri plaintiffs alleged Fields committed against them were the result of Fetzer’s negligence, and were accidental from Fetzer’s viewpoint. Thus, the “occurrence(s)” at issue under the Policies were the negligent acts of Fetzer. The court found that no single “occurrence” was the proximate cause of all of the plaintiffs’ injuries. Rather, Fetzer was alleged to have been negligent in supervising Fields’ conduct with respect to each separate plaintiff. The plaintiffs alleged that because of Fetzer’s negligence, they were assaulted under different circumstances, at different times, and at different locations.

Fetzer has appealed the district court’s decision to the Sixth Circuit (Case No. 18-3057, Jan. 17, 2018).

The analysis may differ state to state – the district court in this case looked to Ohio case law – but on these facts an insured may be hard pressed to argue Fetzer’s position. As the Seventh Circuit stated in Lee v. Interstate Fire & Cas. Co., 86 F.3d 101, 104-105 (7th Cir. 1996), declining to hold that a Roman Catholic diocese’s negligent supervision of a priest was one occurrence:

[N]egligent supervision is not invariably one ‘occurrence’ . . . . the same kind of negligent act can occur several times with separate injuries, producing several occurrences.


Written by:

Carlton Fields

Carlton Fields on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.