Medical Marijuana Dispensaries: Maintaining Business Records for Federal Income Tax Purposes, Not as Hard as it Sounds

Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP

Generally, medical marijuana dispensaries are not allowed to deduct expenses for federal income tax purposes because buying and selling marijuana, even for medical reasons, is considered “trafficking in illegal drugs.”  Such dispensaries, however, are allowed to offset income by cost of goods sold (“COGS”) if they maintain sufficiently reliable records to allow the IRS to verify their income and expenditures.  Although public opinion has shifted more in favor of medical marijuana in recent years, industry culture persists so that business transactions are still primarily in cash and not formally recorded.  As a result, the industry as a whole continues to struggle to maintain sufficient business records for federal income tax purposes. 

A closer look at recent cases shows that the requirement to maintain business records sufficient to satisfy the IRS may not be as difficult as it initially appears. In a recent Tax Court case (Feinberg v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2017-211), the Court considered the application of the “Cohan Rule” to medical marijuana dispensaries to determine the amount of COGS. Under the Cohan Rule, a court may estimate the amount of a deductible expense if a taxpayer establishes that an expense is deductible but is unable to substantiate the precise amount.  For the Cohan Rule to apply there must be sufficient evidence in the record to provide a basis upon which an estimate can be made. The Cohan Rule has been extended to apply to COGS.

Even though the taxpayers in this Tax Court case did not succeed, the case is instructive because it shows that if dispensaries are unable (or unwilling) to maintain contemporaneous and detailed business records they may still be able to offset their income with COGS by relying on the Cohan Rule to estimate their expenses if the records maintained provide at least a basis upon which estimates of the expenses can be made.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP

Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.