Messages for Public Companies from the SEC’s Spate of September Enforcement Actions

King & Spalding
Contact

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission wrapped up its fiscal year on September 30, 2019 with a flurry of enforcement actions filed in the final weeks of the month. These cases will provide fodder for analysis for months to come, but for those who don’t want to wait, this note discusses themes from eight notable public company accounting and disclosure settlements announced in September.

The eight September settlements, all of which were entered into on a neither admit nor deny basis, involved a range of improper accounting and disclosure violations that to varying degrees provided a misleading picture of the companies’ business performance. In several of the settlements, for example, the SEC found or alleged that the companies inappropriately recorded accounting entries for the purpose of reporting results that met research analysts’ consensus earnings estimates, and in others, the SEC found that companies had made misleading statements about other metrics important to investors.

Specifically, the SEC found or alleged that:

  • A manufacturer of paint and other coating materials delayed or failed to record certain expense accruals and misclassified income as coming from continuing operations;[i]
  • A bank holding company improperly classified and delayed taking appropriate charges for individually impaired loans;[ii]
  • A data services and measurement company manipulated monetary and non-monetary contracts and made false or misleading disclosures regarding customer counts and flagship product revenues;[iii]
  • A semiconductor component producer accelerated sales into current quarters “without disclosing the significant impact on revenues from its use of pull-ins” and without disclosing the impact on future sales expectations;[iv]
  • A Japanese automaker whose sponsored ADRs trade in the U.S. did not disclose over $140 million in compensation and retirement benefits given to its CEO;[v]
  • A London-based automaker and its U.S. subsidiary inaccurately reported new vehicle sales;[vi]
  • A global pharmaceutical company did not properly disclose and record an accrual relating to a Department of Justice investigation and, in its Risk Factors, stated that certain risks “may” happen when they already had happened;[vii] and
  • A direct selling company inaccurately described its business model in China.[viii]

Below, we discuss in more detail the facts and violations described in these cases, which resulted in combined penalties of $116,900,000 and provide a window into the SEC’s current primary areas of focus when it comes to public company accounting and disclosure. These cases and the current activity we have observed in active enforcement investigations confirm that the SEC remains, and currently is, very focused on whether judgment calls made in financial reporting and disclosure items were inappropriately skewed toward demonstrating positive results, rather than providing a more accurate picture for investors.

IMPROPER ACCOUNTING TREATMENT

Expense Accruals. A basic tenet of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) is that companies must accrue for expenses as they are incurred. Because professional judgment is required in determining the amounts and timing for accruing expenses, companies often create procedures to guide employees in consistently applying factors and processes in determining the appropriate accruals in accordance with GAAP.

In one settlement, however, the SEC found that an officer of the company “track[ed] earnings and determin[ed] whether, and how, to record certain accounting entries, often late in the closing process, based on the entries’ potential to move income from continuing operations positively or negatively in order to meet analysts’ consensus expected earnings, or to narrow a gap.” The SEC found that the company either made “intentionally erroneous accounting entries” or failed to make (or delayed making) necessary entries – and that this happened in a large number of expense accounts, including:

  • performance-based Restricted Stock Units expense, where, “without a reasonable basis,” the company “reduced an input to the performance factor methodology” so that its accrual would be smaller than required by GAAP;
  • self-insured healthcare claim expense, where, after estimating its exposure, an officer of the company directed a subordinate not to make (until the following quarter) the accrual that was needed to record the estimated exposure;
  • severance expense, where an officer of the company “without reasonable basis” directed that only a small portion of the company’s contractual liability to a departing employee be recorded in the current quarter (and that the balance be recorded in a later period);
  • vacation pay expense, where the company made a change in to its vacation pay policy in Q2 but delayed recording the increased expense associated with that change until Q4;
  • pension expenses and intangible asset amortization, where the company discovered that it needed to correct certain entries but decided not to make those corrections until a subsequent quarter;
  • legal and property tax expenses, where the company decided not to make the appropriate accruals in Q1 opting to instead improperly put those accrual off until the next quarter;
  • compensation plan pay-outs, where the company improperly decided to delay a true-up of pay-outs that had been approved;
  • healthcare claims, where the company “without a reasonable basis” and “contrary to GAAP” decided to release a portion of a reserve that had been set up in a prior period; and
  • inventory valuations, where the company selectively conducted atypical off-cycle inventory re-evaluations in order to increase inventory valuations in two consecutive quarters (which, like the above expense adjustments, also led to increases in net income).

Income Adjustments. In the same settlement, the SEC found that, at the direction of the company’s officer, the company made “intentionally erroneous accounting entries” to misclassify restructuring reserves and various reserves for discontinued operations as gains to income for continuing operations, which inappropriately increased “a non-GAAP measure that was a component of [the company’s] reported EPS.”

Impairment Charges. Another area of judgment the SEC has been reviewing relates to impairments, and one of the September settlements provides an example. The SEC found that a public bank holding company failed to identify and properly classify some loans and take appropriate charges for individually impaired loans as required by ASC 310-10-35. The SEC concluded that the bank failed to follow its own procedures in reviewing and assigning risk ratings to its loans and that the company “relied too heavily on borrowers’ and guarantors’ reputations, their historic business and banking relationship with [the bank], and their expected future prospects for more business, while overlooking indicators of financial distress.” The SEC also found that there were failures in identifying and evaluating whether loan modifications constituted Troubled Debt Restructurings. According to the SEC’s order, these failures collectively resulted in material understatements to the bank’s allowance and provision for loan loss accounts.

Barter Transactions. Another settlement involved several barter transactions (“non-monetary transactions” or “NMTs”) in which the company provided data sets to other companies in return for data sets from those companies. The SEC concluded that these NMTs had been accounted for improperly. In particular, the SEC found that “[the company’s] conclusions that the NMTs had commercial substance and that the fair values of the data assets subject to the exchanges could be determined within reasonable limits [as required by ASC 845-10-30-3] were based on unsupported, false, or misleading statements or assumptions.” As a result, the NMTs could not be accounted for by using fair value, and because the data transferred had no recorded or book value (because it could be duplicated easily), no revenue should have been recorded.

Linked Transactions. The SEC also found that this company accounted for certain transactions as though they were separate transactions when, in fact, they were linked. This resulted in the company improperly recognizing revenue.

Side Agreements. In addition, the SEC found that the company’s CEO entered into side agreements allowing the CEO “to hide from internal accountants and the independent auditor future data delivery obligations, thereby permitting [the company] to recognize all revenue from the contracts in the quarter they were signed rather than having to defer some or all of the revenue to future quarters.”

INADEQUATE DISCLOSURES.

Key Performance Metrics. The September settlements underscore a broader recent trend in which the SEC has charged companies for making false statements or omissions regarding key performance metrics to give an impression of better performance than the company actually achieved.

In one settlement, for example, the SEC found that the company’s employees maintained a database of actual but reported vehicle sales that it referred to as the “cookie jar,” which it dipped into to inflate vehicle sales numbers for months when the company wanted to report better results than it actually recorded. In at least two quarters, this resulted in the company falsely reporting year-over-year sales growth in two months when in fact, sales declined in those months when compared to the prior year. The SEC also found that the company paid dealers to report “fake sales” that were later “unwound.”

Another settlement also addressed this issue, finding that the company and its CEO had manipulated two different performance metrics. One was a customer count number, for which the company altered the counting methodology over time to count individuals within advertising agencies rather than just the agencies, and to count customers at a lower revenue threshold over time. The other performance metric was a reported product sales number, for which the company altered its methodology to include more types of products within that reported tally. In both instances, the company changed its counting methodology without disclosing that the changes meant comparisons to prior periods were not “apples to apples.”

Pull-In Sales. Earnings management, or the practice of companies manipulating their earnings in order to meet guidance or analysts’ expectations, long has been a priority for the SEC’s enforcement program, and, as noted above, the end of the fiscal year featured several cases in this area. In one case, the SEC found that the company had orchestrated a scheme to accelerate, or “pull-in”, sales to current quarters that had been scheduled for future periods in order to close the gap between the company’s publicly-issued targets and its actual results. The company offered various financial incentives to convince customers to agree to accept product earlier than expected, such as rebates, discounts, free product, and extended payment terms. While the transactions were compliant with GAAP, the SEC’s order found that the company misled investors by failing to disclose the purpose, scope, or effect of the pull-in transactions. First, investors were left with the misleading impression that the company was meeting guidance through organic growth and normal customer demand for its products. Further, investors were unaware of the impact that the pull-in sales were having on revenue in future quarters.[ix]

Loss Contingencies and Risk Factors Relating to Government Investigations. The SEC charged another company with (i) failing to properly disclose or accrue for contingent losses from a DOJ False Claims Act investigation, and (ii) making misleading risk factor disclosures.[x] The case is notable because it involves a scenario regularly faced by public companies – when to disclose and accrue for a loss arising from a non-public government investigation – and because it is the second such case that the Commission has brought in recent years.[xi]

ASC 450 covers accounting for “contingencies” and requires issuers to disclose a material loss contingency if it is at least reasonably possible that it will occur, which is defined as a chance the loss will occur that is more than remote but less than likely. In addition, an issuer must record an accrual for a material loss contingency once the chance of the loss occurring becomes probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. Under the accounting literature, “probable” means “likely to occur,” so the likelihood threshold for requiring a loss accrual (“probable”) is a higher standard than the threshold for simply disclosing the loss contingency (“reasonably possible”).

The SEC’s complaint alleged that in November 2014, the company received a DOJ subpoena as part of a DOJ False Claims Act investigation into whether the company misclassified its products as generic and, therefore, overcharged the government for sales to Medicaid patients. The complaint alleges that the company argued over the ensuing months that DOJ should close its investigation, but DOJ rejected these arguments and requested that the company sign a tolling agreement. In October 2015, the company produced a damages analysis to DOJ that showed potential damages ranging from approximately $12-42 million, before trebling, for just one quarter of the multiple quarters at issue in the investigation. The SEC alleged that, as a result, the company knew or should have known by no later than the filing of its 10-Q for the third quarter of 2015 (on October 30, 2015) that the likelihood of a material loss relating to the DOJ investigation was at least reasonably possible, but improperly failed to disclose either the related loss contingency or an estimated range of loss.[xii]

The complaint also alleged that in June 2016, after additional production and negotiations, the company produced to the DOJ a damages estimate of $114-260 million, before trebling, for one year of the period under investigation. In July 2016, DOJ provided its own damages estimates and threatened suit unless the company made a settlement offer, and then in early August rejected the company’s $50 million offer and countered with a significantly higher amount. The complaint alleged that the company thus knew or should have known by the time it filed its second quarter 10-Q (on August 9, 2016) that a material loss resulting from the DOJ investigation was probable and that this loss was reasonably estimable, but the company improperly failed to accrue its best estimate of the loss (or, if it did not have a best estimate, the minimum amount of the loss within the estimated range of losses). The company did not disclose the DOJ investigation or potential loss contingency until October 7, 2016, when it announced that it had reached a $465 million settlement with DOJ.

In addition to the loss contingency disclosure violations, the SEC also alleged that the company’s risk factors were misleading because they stated that there was a risk that the government could take the position that the company’s product classification was incorrect when the company had been informed by the government that it was taking that position.

Executive Compensation. The SEC announced on September 23, 2019, that it had settled an action against a Japanese automaker, its former CEO, and a “representative director” (whom the SEC described as a human resources executive and the CEO’s subordinate) relating to the accounting for, and disclosure of, compensation and retirement benefits paid (or to be paid) to the company’s CEO. The Commission’s order details how the CEO and representative director misled the company’s CFO and other executives and how the CEO and representative director took various actions, including entering into “secret contracts” and executing “backdated letters” either to increase the CEO’s compensation and retirement benefits or pay out those benefits in ways that would avoid disclosure. This misconduct caused the disclosures in the company’s filings to materially understate the amount of CEO compensation and to misstate why the company’s retirement allowances had increased – which in turn caused the financial statements to be materially false and misleading.

Business Structure. On September 27, 2019, the Commission also announced a settled action arising out of a company’s misleading disclosures about the nature of its operations in China, which grew to account for approximately 20% of the company’s worldwide sales by 2018. The company generally sells its products through multi-level marketing, which is considered a legal form of direct selling in the U.S. and other countries where the company operates, but which is prohibited in China. The Commission’s order found that the company repeatedly said in its periodic filings that it employed a different business model in China due to this restriction, when in fact the business model it used in China was essentially the same multi-level marketing model that it used in other countries. The Commission’s order found that these misstatements deprived investors of information to fully evaluate the risks associated with the company’s China business.

The disclosures that were found to be inadequate differ in the five cases discussed above. But, of significance, in several of these cases, the inadequate disclosure does not appear to have resulted in the misstatement of any numbers in the financial statements. Together, these cases show that SEC is concerned not just about cases where the numbers in the financial statements proper might have been “managed,” but also with cases where the disclosures do not fairly describe matters of interest to inventors.

LOOKING AHEAD

In all of these cases, the SEC’s concern was that, because of the illegal activities, investors received an inaccurate picture of each company’s business. In some situations, the SEC concluded that the inaccurate picture occurred because the company wanted to create an appearance that the company had performed consistently with the “consensus expectations” of analysts who covered the company. In other situations, the SEC found that companies touted performance improvement or consistency using internally-generated metrics as if the same methodology had been consistently used to generate them, when that was not the case. In some cases, companies downplayed or avoided disclosing bad news.

These SEC settlements provide a window into what’s on the mind of SEC enforcement attorneys as they investigate tips, complaints, and statistical anomalies regarding accounting and disclosure issues, and are consistent with investigative trends we see in our own practice. These settlements also illustrate that even as the SEC’s current leadership prioritizes cyber, cryptocurrency, and frauds affecting retail investors, public company accounting and disclosure cases always will be a central part of the Enforcement Division’s program.

[i] See In the Matter of PPG Industries, Inc., Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 4094 (September 26, 2019).

[ii] See In the Matter of The Bancorp, Inc., Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 4081 (September 20, 2019).

[iii] See In the Matter of Comscore, Inc., Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 4091 (September 24, 2019).

[iv] See In the Matter of Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 4076 (September 16, 2019).

[v] See In the Matter of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 4086 (September 23, 2019).

[vi] See In the Matter of FCA US LLC and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 4095 (September 27, 2019).

[vii] See Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mylan N.V., No. 19-civ-2904 (D.D.C. filed September 27, 2019), Litigation Release No. 24621 (September 27, 2019); Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 4096 (September 27, 2019).

[viii] See In the Matter of Herbalife Nutrition, Ltd., Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 87131 (September 27, 2019).

[ix] Prior, similar SEC cases include SEC v. Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., No. 1:18-cv-08886 (S.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 28, 2018), and In the Matter of Coca-Cola Co., Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Rel. No. 2232 (April 18, 2005).

[x] Unlike the other cases discussed in this article, the Mylan case involves allegations in federal court and an agreed-upon settlement without Mylan admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations. As a result, these are not “findings” of the SEC, and instead are “allegations.”

[xi] See SEC Charges RPM International Inc. and its General Counsel for Disclosure and Accounting Failures (Sept. 9, 2016), available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2016/lr23639.htm.

[xii] In addition to disclosing a reasonably possible loss contingency, ASC 450-20-50-4 requires that such a disclosure include an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding
Contact
more
less

King & Spalding on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.