Minnesota Federal District Court Explores Application of Corporate Practice of Medicine Doctrine to MRI Scans

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP

On March 25, 2014, in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc., the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota held that a corporation not owned or controlled by physicians does not violate Minnesota’s corporate practice of medicine doctrine by employing technologists to perform magnetic resonance imaging (“MRI”) scans and having independent contractor physicians interpret the scans. In State Farm, the court indicated that lay entities may carry out certain technical aspects of medical diagnostic imaging services without violating Minnesota’s corporate practice of medicine doctrine.

The State Farm case arose when State Farm insurance company informed Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. (“MDI”), a Minnesota business corporation, that it would not honor bills MDI submitted for performing MRI scans. State Farm sought a declaratory judgment that it has no obligation to pay outstanding bills to MDI because MDI’s services violate the corporate practice of medicine doctrine.

The Corporate Practice of Medicine Doctrine

The corporate practice of medicine doctrine forbids corporations from the practice of health care professions. As the court in State Farm noted, the doctrine prohibits lay corporations from employing licensed health care professionals to perform medical services. The doctrine stems from a corporation’s inability to meet state professional licensure requirements and other public policy concerns such as protecting physicians’ independent medical judgment.

The Corporate Practice of Medicine Doctrine’s Application to MRI Scans

A. The Technical and Professional Components of MRI Scans are Separable.

The corporate practice of medicine doctrine does not automatically cover every form of health care or therapy. In this case, State Farm argued that the doctrine prohibits MDI from providing MRI services because the MRI process requires licensed professional involvement at all stages. MDI, in contrast, argued that MRIs involve two separate steps: (1) the physical recording of a scan; and (2) the interpretation of the scan. MDI claimed it does not violate the corporate practice of medicine doctrine by performing the technical component of taking the scan, which requires limited training, and contracting with physicians to carry out the professional component of interpreting the scans. Both parties agreed that interpreting MRI scans constitutes practicing medicine, meaning that MDI violates the corporate practice of medicine doctrine if the technical and professional components are not divisible.

The Minnesota Supreme Court has not directly addressed whether MRI services are separable into technical and professional components. In considering this unresolved state law question, the federal district court predicted that the Minnesota Supreme Court would hold the technical and professional components are divisible. The court noted that no Minnesota precedent suggests the components of the MRI process are inseparable, and Minnesota statutes concerning diagnostic-imaging facilities seem to contemplate lay ownership. The court concluded that Minnesota law suggests that some parts of MRI services need not be performed or controlled by a physician. Further, the court noted that MDI’s use of global billing (billing for taking and interpreting MRI scans together) does not demonstrate inseparability of the technical and professional components of the MRI process. In reaching this conclusion, the court pointed to the widespread use of global billing in the industry.

B. Performing the Technical Component Does Not Violate the Corporate Practice of Medicine Doctrine.

After finding the technical and professional components of MRI scans are separable, the court decided that MDI does not violate the corporate practice of medicine doctrine by performing only the technical component. The court noted that part of the justification underlying the corporate practice of medicine doctrine is that professionals must fulfill significant educational and training requirements, are part of a licensed profession, and exercise independent professional judgment. MDI technologists, however, do not have to satisfy state training or licensure requirements and have less substantial educational requirements than professions that fall within the corporate practice of medicine doctrine. The court analogized MDI technologists’ education, training, and accreditation requirements to those of physical therapists who Minnesota courts have excluded from the reach of the doctrine. Finally, the court noted that MDI technologists do not exercise any independent professional judgment. Accordingly, the court held that MDI does not violate the corporate practice of medicine doctrine by performing the technical component of MRI scans.

C. Contracting with Physicians to Interpret Scans Does Not Violate the Corporate Practice of Medicine Doctrine.

Next, the court held that MDI does not indirectly practice medicine through its arrangement with independent contractor physicians to interpret MRI scans. As the court noted, the practice of medicine includes diagnosis or analysis of a condition. An unlicensed person could violate the corporate practice of medicine doctrine by communicating a physician’s findings or advice to a patient for diagnostic or treatment purposes. MDI, however, did not directly transmit any scans or findings to patients and instead relayed scans and physician’s reports to referring medical providers. The court concluded that MDI’s relationship with independent contractors to interpret MRI scans with no direct communication by MDI to patients does not violate the corporate practice of medicine doctrine.


State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. examines the reach of Minnesota’s corporate practice of medicine doctrine as applied to MRI services. The case suggests that Minnesota law allows lay entities to perform technical aspects of diagnostic imaging processes, and that courts will look to the education, training, and accreditation requirements for performing a service when determining whether a violation of the corporate practice of medicine doctrine occurs. Finally, the case indicates that lay entities may contract with physicians to perform professional services if the entity does not communicate findings directly to patients.

Summer Associate Sarah Claypool provided significant assistance in the creation of this article.



DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.