Natural Gas Transportation: 2018 FERC Rate Cases Are Expected to Raise Novel Issues

by Morgan Lewis

Morgan Lewis

Over a half dozen natural gas rate proceedings are expected to be initiated in 2018, many of which will raise issues such as the impact of the new tax laws on rates and the inclusion of a pipeline modernization tracker in rates.

The dawn of a new year often brings resolutions, optimism, and commitments for improvement. In recent years in the natural gas sector, the dawn of a new year has brought general rate cases initiated by either the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under Section 5 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) or by pipelines themselves pursuant to Section 4 of the NGA. Such cases generally raise recurring issues familiar to practitioners well-versed in the field of natural gas interstate transport and storage ratemaking. In turn, natural gas pipeline shippers have grown accustomed to analyzing similar issues across multiple proceedings initiated at FERC in recent history.

Unlike prior years, several novel issues are expected to be raised in FERC natural gas rate proceedings in 2018 and beyond. Over a half dozen cases are due to be filed at FERC in 2018, which presents an opportunity for shippers to effectively advocate for themselves with respect to several new issues in numerous proceedings.

2018 Rate Cases

Through a combination of proceedings initiated under Sections 4 and 5 of the NGA, FERC generally is asked to consider the rates of numerous natural gas pipeline and storage providers annually. The volume in any given year varies, which reflects both FERC’s determination as to whether to initiate Section 5 proceedings (and if so, how many), and whether pipelines are obligated to file a rate case. The NGA does not require a pipeline to submit to a rate review at any particular interval, unlike the requirement imposed on pipelines providing transport pursuant to Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act. For that reason, pipeline general rate cases often arise as a result of an obligation imposed from a prior settlement proceeding.

By way of example, FERC has initiated 16 investigations into the rates of natural gas pipelines pursuant to Section 5 of the NGA since November 2009.[1] With respect to proceedings initiated under Section 4 of the NGA, pipelines initiated at least four general rate cases in 2017 alone.[2]

2018 promises to be an even more active year than 2017. To date, FERC has not initiated any Section 5 proceedings in 2018. Notwithstanding, pipeline customers already anticipate at least seven general rate cases to be filed in 2018.

Due to applicable and currently-effective settlement provisions, rate cases are due to be filed by:


Docket No. - Applicable Comeback

Southern Natural Gas Co., LLC


Saltville Gas Storage Co., LLC


Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.


Mississippi River Transmission, LLC


Trailblazer Pipeline Co., LLC


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co., LLC


WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.


In each of these proceedings, the pipeline or storage provider is expected to propose revisions to applicable rates and may also propose revisions to certain terms and conditions of service. The data and assumptions underlying the proposals in each of these proceedings will raise numerous issues requiring FERC consideration and, potentially, litigation between the parties.

Novel 2018 Rate Case Issues

In 2018, the issues that historically arise in pipeline general rate case proceedings are again expected to be germane. Those issues may include, for example, rate base computations, operating and maintenance expenses, depreciation, revenue credits, and the expenses properly included in the appropriate Base Period (as adjusted) when considering the pipeline’s revenue requirement proposed in a rate case. It is also common to analyze questions surrounding capital structure when considering questions relating to just and reasonable rates of return. In fact, some pipelines have already taken steps to “preview” issues that may arise in the course of a general rate case through various postings on the pipeline’s Electronic Bulletin Board.

However, 2018 also requires pipeline customers to confront novel issues that have historically been subject to dispute in only limited circumstances, if at all. The obligation for customers to consider such novel issues presents opportunity, however, because resolution of the issues may materially and directly impact the rates that customers are assessed.

Three examples of novel issues are discussed below.

Impact of New Tax Legislation

On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act) following passage in the House and Senate earlier that week. The Act includes many provisions that would directly and indirectly affect the oil and gas sector. While the effect of the provisions in the Act should be analyzed on a company-specific basis, several provisions of the Act generally impact: (i) the manner in which natural gas pipeline and storage providers compute their federal income taxes; and (ii) the rate at which those entities are taxed.

For example, under the Act, deductions for net interest expense are limited when net interest expense exceeds 30% of adjusted taxable income. The Act limits the deduction for net operating losses to 80% of taxable income, repeals the corporate alternative minimum tax, and includes a five-year period for 100% expensing (for many assets), followed by a five-year phase down of those provisions. From a tax rate perspective, the Act reduces the corporate federal income tax rate to 21% and individuals generally receive a 20% deduction on certain pass-through income.

Each of these changes, in addition to others set forth in the Act, directly impacts the manner in which a natural gas pipeline or storage provider will compute its federal tax obligations.  Familiarity with the Act and its implications on natural gas pipeline tax computations is essential to reliably test the federal income tax assertions and accompanying workpapers that a pipeline will submit in its general rate case. Because a pipeline is allowed to recover its federal (and state) income tax obligations from its customers, it is critical that pipeline customers properly assess the pipeline’s federal income tax computations when analyzing the rates a pipeline proposes in upcoming general rate cases.

Treatment of Tax Allowance for Pass-Through Entities

As most industry participants are aware, in the summer of 2016, the DC Circuit directed FERC to clarify its basis for allowing a blanket income tax allowance to be included in the cost-of-service of a pass-through entity whose applicable return on equity (ROE) was computed on a discounted cash flow (DCF) basis. In United Airlines v. FERC, the DC Circuit concluded that FERC’s policy of granting a tax allowance to pass-through pipelines results in inequitable returns for partners in those pipelines, as compared to shareholders in corporate pipelines. Although FERC issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) in December 2016 requesting all industry participants to weigh in on and propose potential solutions to the issues identified by the DC Circuit, FERC has yet to take action on the NOI.

For that reason, pipeline customers in 2018 rate cases should be mindful to consider the implications of a potential FERC decision. To the extent that FERC acts prior to resolution of a case, a proper assessment will be required to ascertain the impact of FERC’s decision. Absent any action, customers may well consider advocating for prophylactic language in any negotiated settlement or as a condition of any FERC order. Such was the case in the recently-approved settlement involving FERC’s Section 5 investigation into the rates of Wyoming Interstate Company, which concluded with a settlement containing a provision in Article IV to account for a potential FERC issuance in light of United Airlines.

Pipeline Modernization Tracker

The degree of evidence a pipeline is required to provide in order to establish a pipeline modernization tracker is also a question that warrants scrutiny by pipeline customers. In an April 2015 Policy Statement, FERC explained that it would permit natural gas pipelines to seek to recover through a surcharge mechanism certain capital expenditures made to modernize pipeline system infrastructure in a manner that enhances system reliability, safety, and regulatory compliance.

A tracker may be approved by FERC following a comprehensive rate review conducted pursuant to Section 4 of the NGA. Although the pipelines due to file cases in 2018 are not required to pursue a modernization tracker, several (or all) of those pipelines may indeed propose a tracker in the course of the general rate case that is to be filed. In recent years, pipelines have become subject to increasing degrees of obligations imposed by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Further, the installation of Administrator Howard Elliott at PHMSA in October 2017 clears the way for the agency to address additional issues that have been pending, which could create further compliance obligations for pipelines and storage providers.

As such, pipeline customers should expect and be prepared to assess a modernization tracker proposal in one or more 2018 general rate cases. Given the limited precedent available on the issue, working familiarity with the Policy Statement and a thorough analysis of the components included in pipeline proposal is critical to perform the requisite assessment.


2018 promises to be an exciting year in the world of natural gas rate cases. To be sure, new issues are expected to arise and consideration of those issues requires a thorough analysis of the pipeline proposal. A thorough and detailed assessment of the pipeline’s proposals combined with a comprehensive understanding of the issues presents pipeline customers with a unique opportunity to secure advantageous rates for the foreseeable future.


[1] Those proceedings involve investigations into the rates of Wyoming Interstate Company (twice), Viking Gas Transmission Company, Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company, Empire Pipeline, Inc., Iroquois Gas Transmission System, LP, Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC (twice), ANR Storage Co., Bear Creek Storage Company LLC, MIGC LLC, Kinder Morgan Gas Transmission LLC, Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C., Northern Natural Gas Company, and Great Lakes Gas Transmission LP.

[2] Those cases involved Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP, Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company, KO Transmission Company, and Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morgan Lewis | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morgan Lewis

Morgan Lewis on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.