New FCPA enforcement mechanism from the DOJ?

by DLA Piper

DLA Piper

In an aggressive effort to encourage companies to self-report putative violations of the FCPA, the Department of Justice has been touting several recent decisions to decline prosecutions ("declinations") based on the self-reporting companies’ full cooperation and disgorgement of all profits attributable to the illicit payments. While clearly part of a marketing effort to push the benefits available under the FCPA Pilot Program launched in April 2016, these resolutions provide additional guidance to companies and compliance professionals as to the kinds of investigation and remediation DOJ and SEC have come to expect. They also provide some data points that can assist in the ongoing struggle to determine when self-reporting is in a company’s interest.

This spring, the Department of Justice announced a one-year Pilot Program intended to incentivize companies to self-report FCPA violations and encourage cooperation with investigations. Pursuant to that program, companies that self-report and cooperate are, in certain circumstances, eligible for declinations and/or reductions in fines.  Such companies can also avoid the appointment of a monitor. At the end of the one-year FCPA Pilot Program, the DOJ will determine whether or not to extend it.

On September 29, 2016, the DOJ announced that two Texas-based private companies − HMT LLC and NCH Corporation − would not face prosecution under the FCPA, notwithstanding the DOJ's conclusion that both companies violated the FCPA.  HMT, a manufacturer of above-ground liquid storage tanks, purportedly paid $500,000 in bribes to government officials in Venezuela and China, which resulted in the purchase of products manufactured by HMT.  NCH, an industrial supply and maintenance company, allegedly gave cash and other things of value to government officials in China for purposes of influencing their purchasing decisions. The DOJ found these activities constituted violations of the FCPA.

Pursuant to its FCPA Pilot Program, the DOJ issued declination letters conditioned upon, among other things, the disgorgement of profits resulting from the companies’ FCPA violations.  As a consequence, HMT was required to disgorge $2.7 million; NCH was required to disgorge $335,000. 

Prior to these recent agreements, DOJ entered into “declinations with disgorgement” back in June and July with three other companies.  Unlike HMT and NCH (both privately held companies over which the SEC lacked jurisdiction) each of those three companies were publicly held “issuers” under the FCPA, and the DOJ’s declinations occurred in the context of ongoing SEC enforcement actions; concurrent with the DOJ’s declinations, the companies entered into non-prosecution agreements with the SEC.  But, in broad strokes, all five resolutions share some common factors.  All five included disgorgement, in amounts ranging from roughly $320,000 to $13.2 million.  This is unsurprising as the FCPA Pilot Program Guidance makes explicit that “even a company that voluntarily self-discloses, fully cooperates, and remediates will be required to disgorge all profits resulting from the FCPA violation.”

More illuminating is the detailed recitations in the HMT and NCH declination letters (and similarly in the statement of facts accompanying the Non-Prosecution Agreements with the SEC) of what each company did to “earn” DOJ’s decision not to bring charges.  In each instance the DOJ cited the fact that the company self-disclosed. But of seeming equal importance were the robustness of the companies’ internal investigations (characterized by DOJ as “HMT’s thorough and comprehensive global investigation” and “NCH’s thorough and comprehensive internal investigation”) and the sweeping remediation undertaken. Both HMT and NCH took significant steps to enhance their respective compliance programs and internal accounting controls. 

The DOJ declination letters also spelled out in particular detail remediation efforts linked to punishing bad actors − including in HMT’s case firing eight employees (“including two regional managers and a director of business development”), sanctioning through suspension and financial penalties ten other employees, and severing ties with nine agents/distributors.

Rounding out the reasons for DOJ’s decision to bring no charges were the agreement to disgorge all profits, which each company agreed not to use for any tax deduction or to accept reimbursement from insurance or any other source, and the obligation to continue to fully cooperate  – including specifically by continuing to provide “all known relevant facts about the individuals involved in or responsible for the misconduct,” who are expressly carved out of the declination and could still face prosecution.


In the wake of these actions, what should businesses be doing? 

The goal of the FCPA Pilot Program, remember, is to offer companies greater transparency about the benefits of early and complete cooperation with the government.  And, in fairness, these resolutions do reflect an effort to spell out in more detail, publicly, the thinking behind declinations.  At minimum, the recent letters provide more details as to what the government expects in terms of an internal investigation – “a thorough and comprehensive global investigation” – and remediation, with a renewed focus on individual executives, including (a) consequences regarding their employment (including termination), and (b) continuing cooperation by the company with an eye toward individual criminal prosecutions. 

It is not yet clear whether these declinations with disgorgement are really of much substantive difference from the DOJ’s past non-prosecution agreements with disgorgement or are simply form over substance in aid of marketing the pilot program.  But these resolutions do signal, quite intentionally, that companies should expect meaningful, tangible benefits from early self-disclosure. The devil, as always, will be in the details.

The clear takeaway is that companies need to react to FCPA issues aggressively, investigate and remediate fully, and focus on individual accountability. Whether these resolutions are sufficiently predictive to change the calculus on self-disclosure remains to be seen.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

DLA Piper

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.