New Judicial Interpretations on Scope of Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor

by Polsinelli
Contact

The Federal Circuit recently provided additional clarity about the scope of the Hatch-Waxman safe harbor. In Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the appellate court sharpened the line between activities that fall outside the safe harbor provision of 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1) from those that fall within it and are consequently exempt from claim for patent infringement. Pharmaceutical researchers that avail themselves of the safe harbor's protection may benefit from this additional guidance.

The Hatch-Waxman safe harbor is an important exemption that furthers Congress' goal of bringing generic drug and medical device products to market as soon after patent expiration as possible. Nonetheless, courts' interpretations of the statutory text continue to evolve, and particular conduct needs to be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ("FDCA"), pharmaceutical companies cannot market drugs in the United States without the approval of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The FDA will not grant approval without determining a proposed drug has acceptable safety and efficacy characteristics. Measuring those characteristics and reporting them to the FDA may involve performing methods or manufacturing, using, or importing compounds that are protected by United States patent rights.

It is an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, sell, or to import into the United States a patented invention. The Hatch-Waxman Act, however, created an exception that "[i]t shall not be an act of infringement" when the conduct is "solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use or sale of drugs." This "safe harbor" exempts drug companies from claims of infringement for activity "reasonably related to the development and submission of any information under the FDCA." Merck KGaA v. Integra Life Sciences, 545 U.S. 193, 202 (2005) (emphasis in original). So long as there is "a reasonable basis for believing that use of the patented invention might yield information that would be appropriate to include in a submission to the FDA, that use is 'reasonably related' to the 'development and submission of information under . . . Federal law.'" Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 686 F.3d 1348, 1357–57 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Background on Elan

At issue in Elan was post-approval clinical trials conducted for the purpose of characterizing the effect of food on the absorption of the drug Skelaxin. In early 2001, Elan learned that the FDA intended to grant a Citizen's Petition to reclassify Skelaxin as a "bio problem" drug, meaning the drug had potential or actual bioequivalence problems such that ANDA applicants would need to perform both in vitro and in vivo testing to demonstrate equivalence. See FDA Docket No. 01P-0117/CP1. Elan conducted its own clinical studies and determined that bioavailability significantly increased in the fed state. Elan submitted its information to the FDA together with a supplemental new drug application that revised the product labeling accordingly. Elan also filed patent applications based on the clinical bioavailability data it developed.

Classen sued Elan for infringing a patent directed to a method for accessing and analyzing data on a commercially available drug to identify a new use of that drug, and then commercializing that new use. The Federal Circuit held that conducting a clinical study on the bioavailability of a drug and submitting the results to the FDA to revise that drug's product label were within the scope of the Hatch-Waxman safe harbor because the activities were not "routine" post-approval reporting like those found to be outside the safe harbor in Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen IDEC, 659 F.3d 1057, 1070–72 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (finding voluntary studies of relationship between timing of childhood vaccinations and development of immune-mediated disorders not subject to safe harbor despite submission of adverse experience information to FDA). Rather, they were "necessary" to the approval of the drug and any generic versions, akin to the post-approval batch reporting necessary to maintain FDA approval. Momenta, 686 F.3d at 1357-61 (finding such reports within the scope of the safe harbor). Thus, Elan's performance of clinical studies and its submission of information from those studies to the FDA were not acts of infringement.

Classen also alleged that Elan's use of the information in filing patent applications and in labeling products for sale were acts of infringement. The mere dissemination of information derived from clinical studies is not itself an act of infringement as previously held in Telectronics Pacing Sys. v. Ventritex, Inc., 982 F.2d 1520 (Fed. Cir. 1992). Classen argued, however, that it was the filing of the applications and the sale of the products—not the dissemination of information or its placement on labeling—that constituted the infringing acts. The Federal Circuit did not explicitly reach these issues, but instead deferred to the district court to make findings in view of its guidance about the scope of the safe harbor. The Court did take the unusual step, however, of offering several "observations" that suggest Classen faces an uphill battle in prevailing on its remaining infringement theories.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Polsinelli | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Polsinelli
Contact
more
less

Polsinelli on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.