NLRB Member Hayes Dissents in Representation Case Involving Threats of Violence by Pro-Union Employees

by Proskauer - Labor Relations

[author: Ronald Meisburg]

National Labor Relations Board Member Brian Hayes submitted a vigorous dissent in a recently decided case about whether the results of a union certification election should be set aside because of third party threats made to employees during the pre-election period. 

In Mastec Direct TV, 356 NLRB No. 110, the Board voted 2 to 1 to certify the union as the bargaining representative after receiving a majority of votes in a very close election victory (the union won by one vote).  The conduct at issue included verbal threats by pro-union employees – third parties in Board parlance – to physically harm and sabotage the work of fellow employees if they did not vote for the union.  The threats were made just days before the election.  

Member Hayes agreed with the majority that the Board “must apply a more stringent standard for setting aside an election based on the conduct of persons who are not subject to an employer or union’s direct control.” He vigorously disagreed, however, with the majority’s interpretation and application of the third party misconduct standard announced in Westwood Horizons Hotel, 270 NLRB 802 (1984).  

In Westwood, Member Hayes wrote, the Board set forth the following multifactor standard for determining whether an election should be set aside based upon third party misconduct:

“[W]hether a threat is serious and likely to intimidate prospective voters to case their ballots in a particular manner depends on the threat’s character and circumstances and not merely on the number of employees threatened.  In determining the seriousness of a threat, the Board evaluates not only the nature of the threat itself, but also whether the threat encompassed the entire bargaining unit; whether reports of the threat were disseminated widely within the unit; whether the person making the threat was capable of carrying it out, and whether it is likely that the employees acted in fear of his capability of carrying out the threat; and whether the threat was ‘rejuvenated’ at or near the time of the election.”  [Emphasis added; Westwood, 270 NLRB at 803]. 

The majority in Mastec Direct TV purported to apply this multifactor standard.  But, according to Hayes, the majority in fact applied an even more difficult standard requiring an objecting party to show “widespread and aggravated misconduct.”  (Emphasis added.)

“[T]here are few phrases in the Board’s lexicon that are more misleading,” Hayes wrote, “than the statement . . . that the test for objections to third party threats in an election campaign is ‘whether the misconduct was so aggravated as to create a general atmosphere of fear and reprisal rendering a free election impossible.’”  (Emphasis added, quoting Westwood).  Hayes would abandon this “rote summary statement of the Westwood test, but not the multifactor test itself, which does not require that third party physical threats be pervasive in order to be objectionable.” (Emphasis added.)  

Member Hayes explained that even one employee’s exposure to threats of physical violence could be enough to change the outcome of an election and that here, where at least five employees were exposed to threats of physical reprisal and the election was decided by only one vote, the election should have been set aside. 

Member Hayes also took issue with the Board’s application of the Westwood test and its findings that the threatened employees did not actually fear physical harm because similar language was commonly used in the workplace and that there was no evidence that the pro-union employees were “in a position to make good on the threat[s].”  Hayes stated: 

“Unless the Board is going to impose on an objecting party the burden to prove that an employee making a threat has greater pugilistic skills or physical prowess than the threatened employee, and it has not heretofore imposed such a burden, then it seems an acceptable general proposition that third parties making physical threats are capable of following them through.”  

Member Hayes’dissent raises serious and legitimate concerns regarding the Board's interpretation and application of the Westwood third-party misconduct standard to threats by fellow employees.  Sadly, in today’s workplace employers and workers have every reason to take seriously any threats of violence from their own colleagues.  Such threats have no place at work in any context, not the least of which during an NLRB sponsored election where the employees’ choice regarding union representation is to be protected from such intimidation and coercion.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Proskauer - Labor Relations | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Proskauer - Labor Relations

Proskauer - Labor Relations on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.