NLRB Overrules 2016 Browning-Ferris Decision on Joint Employer Liability

by Baker Donelson
Contact

Baker Donelson

On December 14, 2017, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) overruled its 2015 decision in Browning-Ferris Industries, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) (Browning-Ferris), and reinstated the "direct and immediate" standard to determine joint employer liability that had controlled pre-Browning-Ferris for decades. See Hy-Brand Indus. Contractors, Ltd., 365 NLRB. No. 156 (2017) (Hy-Brand).

Prior to Browning-Ferris, the NLRB held that the "essential element" when evaluating joint employer status "was whether the putative joint employer's control over employment matters is direct and immediate." Airborne Express, 338 NLRB 597 (2002) (emphasis added). The Obama-era NLRB dramatically expanded this standard, finding that "control exercised indirectly – such as through an intermediary – may establish joint-employer status."

Criticizing Browning-Ferris's broader test for joint employer liability as "a distortion of common law," "contrary to the [NLRA]," and "ill-advised as a matter of policy," the NLRB in Hy-Brand decided to "return to the principles governing joint employer that existed" pre-Browning-Ferris.

In its sweeping reversal, the NLRB identified "five major problems" with Browning-Ferris:

  1. The NLRB concluded that the Browning-Ferris test "exceeds the Board's statutory authority" by relying on theories of "economic realities" and "statutory purpose" that "extended the definitions of 'employee' and 'employer' far beyond the common law limits that Congress and the Supreme Court have stated must apply."
  2. The NLRB found that the Browning-Ferris rationale for altering the definition of "employer," i.e., "to protect bargaining from limitations resulting from the absence from the table of third parties that indirectly affect employment-related issues," was misplaced. Browning-Ferris is grounded in the idea that the current economy is a "radical departure from simpler times when labor negotiations were unaffected by the direct employer's commercial dealings with other entities." The Trump NLRB disagreed, noting that Congress "was obviously aware of the existence of third-party relationships" when it limited bargaining obligations to the employer in 1935, limited the definition of employee and employer to their common law agency meaning in 1947, and strengthened secondary boycott protection afforded to third parties in 1947 and 1959.
  3. The NLRB determined that Browning-Ferris "mistakenly interpreted" courts' deference to the Board's authority to make factual distinctions when applying the agency standard as a grant of authority to modify the standard itself. The NLRB opined that its "fundamental disagreement" with the Browning-Ferris test was that it made indirect control "potentially dispositive without any evidence of direct control even in a single area." 
  4. The NLRB stated that the Browning-Ferris standard "deprived employees, unions, and employers of certainty and predictability regarding the identity of the 'employer'" by imposing "unprecedented" bargaining obligations "based solely on a never-exercised right to exercise 'indirect' control over what the Board later decides is an "essential" employment term, to be determined in litigation on a case-by-case basis."
  5. The NLRB said that Browning-Ferris's attempt to correct a perceived inequality of bargaining leverage was the "wrong target," finding that this was an "economic reality" that the Board lacked the authority to address.

Under the standard articulated by the NLRB in Hy-Brand, a finding of joint employer status requires "proof that putative joint employer entities have exercised joint control over essential employment terms (rather than merely having "reserved" the right to exercise control), the control must be "direct and immediate" (rather than indirect), and joint-employer status will not result from control that is 'limited and routine.'"

Following the NLRB's decision, Browning-Ferris Industries of California and the NLRB advised the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit of the standard announced in Hy-Brand. The NLRB asked the D.C. Circuit to remand Browning-Ferris to the NLRB for reconsideration in light of Hy-Brand. The court agreed and remanded the case on December 22, 2017.

The reversal will have a dramatic effect on the claim that McDonald’s and its franchisees are joint employers. However, the decision is subject to reversal under a future progressive administration. The issue could be permanently resolved if the Senate passes the Save Local Business Act, which was passed by the House in November 2017. The Act provides that "[a] person may be considered a joint employer in relation to an employee only if such person directly, actually, and immediately, and not in a limited and routine manner, exercises significant control over essential terms and conditions of employment, such as hiring employees, discharging employees, determining individual employee rates of pay and benefits, day-to-day supervision of employees, assigning individual work schedules, positions, and tasks, or administering employee discipline."

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Baker Donelson | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Baker Donelson
Contact
more
less

Baker Donelson on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.