NLRB Rules Joint Employer Test Hinges On Control Over Employment Terms

by Fox Rothschild LLP

Fox Rothschild LLP

The National Labor Relations Board has ruled that the test for determining whether a joint employer relationship exists hinges on whether the entities have “direct and immediate control” over employment terms. In doing so, the Board overruled its own 2015 decision that had announced an unproductively broad joint employer standard.

The Board's Dec. 14, 2017 decision in Hy-Brand Contractors Ltd. clarifies the process used to determine joint employer relationships and thereby mitigates unwarranted litigation and labor claims against uninvolved businesses.

A joint employer relationship arises where two separate employers (or other entities, like franchisors) exercise control over the employment terms of employees. If a joint employer relationship is established, both employers may be held liable for labor practice violations or be required to jointly bargain with the union representing the employees.

With its in ruling in Hy-Brand, the NLRB returned to the interpretation that joint employer relationships are formed from entities that have a “direct and immediate control” over employment terms. The decision abandons the test announced in 2015 in Browning Ferris Industries that applied indirect control standards.

Prior to the Browning Ferris Industries decision, the Board had required a showing that a putative joint employer exercised direct control over terms or conditions of employment, i.e. hiring, firing, discipline, supervision and direction, and rejected joint employer status where a putative joint employer exercised only “limited and routine” direction of employees.

In Browning Ferris Industries, the Board effectively broadened the definition of “employer” under the National Labor Relations Act to include those entities that possessed the right to control employment terms, whether or not that control was actually exercised, and where the right to control was “direct or indirect.” This standard covered a large number of entities that might possibly exercise indirect control over employment terms. The majority in Browning Ferris Industries intended to ameliorate collective bargaining that resulted from complex business relationships that excluded workers from meaningful bargaining over employment terms.

Now, in Hy-Brand, the Board has concluded that the decision in Browning Ferris Industries was a misguided attempt to expand the reach of the NLRA without Congressional authority. Importantly, Hy-Brand holds that the Board is limited in its authority to interpret the definition of “employer” under the NLRA to common law agency principles that formalize employer-employee relationships and employer authority over essential employment terms. Further, the Board cannot expand the scope of its authority on a policy basis by perceiving an “inequality of bargaining leverage” due to the business relationships present in the modern economy.

After finding that the Board in Browning Ferris Industries exceeded its authority, it held that joint employer must exercise:

joint control over essential employment terms (rather than merely having reserved the right to exercise control), the control must be direct and immediate (rather than indirect), and the joint-employer status will not result from control that is "limited and routine."

The Browning Ferris Industries decision was too vague to be workable, the Board declared in Hy-Brand, noting that the following types of entities could be considered as an “employer” under that test:

  • insurance companies
  • franchisors
  • banks or lenders
  • any company granting access to facilities for the performance of services
  • any contracting party that “is concerned about the quality of contracted services
  • consumers who exert any power over the manner of a contractor’s performance

The Board further detailed wide-ranging problems that would arise if joint employers with little actual connection to employees were subjected to bargaining with a union representing the joint employees. Moreover, the Browning Ferris Industries standards would lead to conflicts with franchise law, trademark law and even current Board law regarding neutral parties subject to union boycotts.

The return to the “direct and immediate” control test for determining joint employer relationships will re-introduce an important element of certainty into the Board’s processes and diminish the potential for undeserved scrutiny against businesses.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Fox Rothschild LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Fox Rothschild LLP

Fox Rothschild LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.