No Bad Faith Recovery Based on Insurer’s Investigation of Claims Under Connecticut Law

by Cozen O'Connor

On certification from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, the Supreme Court of Connecticut recently issued an opinion holding that an insurer’s bad faith conduct in the investigation of a third-party liability insurance claim does not provide a basis for recovery under Connecticut law. Capstone Bldg. Corp. v. Am. Motorists Ins. Co., 2013 Conn. LEXIS 187 (Conn. June 11, 2013).

In Capstone, the insureds filed suit against their insurer alleging breach of contract and bad faith in connection with the insurer’s denial of coverage for a claim arising out of the construction of a student housing building at the University of Connecticut. The insurer disclaimed coverage under the CGL policy at issue on the basis that the liability arose out of the insureds’ own work. After settling the underlying litigation, the insureds filed suit against the insurer in the Northern District of Alabama. The district court then certified three issues of unsettled law to the Supreme Court of Connecticut for resolution. These issues included the proper interpretation of the terms “property damage” and “occurrence”; the circumstances under which a cause of action is available for the insurer’s bad faith conduct in the investigation of a claim; and the circumstances under which an insurer that wrongfully denies coverage is liable for settlement costs where only certain claims are covered under the policy.1

Citing precedent that a bad faith action must allege denial of the receipt of an express benefit under the policy, Renaissance Mgmt. Co. v. Conn. Housing Finance Auth., 915 A.2d 290 (2007), the Connecticut Supreme Court declined to recognize a bad faith cause of action “based solely on the [ ] insurer’s failure to conduct a discretionary investigation of claims.” The court, however, reaffirmed that its analysis did not limit the bad faith cause of action for failure to defend or indemnify, which is well established under Connecticut law.

In reaching its conclusion that there was no separate cause of action for bad faith based solely on the insurer’s failure to conduct a discretionary investigation of claims for coverage, the court cited the language of the insuring agreement that specifically provided: “[w]e may, at our discretion, investigate any ‘occurrence’ and settle any claim or ‘suit’ that may result.” The court reasoned that insofar as the policy gave the insurer the “sole discretion” to determine when and whether to investigate a claim, the insured could not recover for bad faith based on the insurer’s conduct in its investigation, if any. Instead, the court held that bad faith requires the breach of an express duty and must implicate the insurer’s obligations under the policy. “Unless the alleged failure to investigate led to the denial of a contractually mandated benefit in this case, the plaintiffs have not raised a viable bad faith claim.”

Though an insurer’s investigation is an essential part of the insurer’s assessment of its duty to defend or indemnify, the court held that a bad faith cause of action lies only where the insurer breaches a contractual duty. The court opined that its holding was consistent with the majority of jurisdictions and authoritative treatises, as those cases that permit recovery based on deficiencies in the insurer’s investigation generally do so when the conduct is coupled with the insurer’s breach of its duty to defend or indemnify its insured.

While this decision generally favors insurers, the court’s analysis recognizes that even if the failure to properly investigate a claim does not give rise to a separate cause of action, the conduct can still be evidence of bad faith. The court cautioned that its holding “should not create an incentive for insurers to fail to investigate claims. Insurers disclaiming their duty to defend or indemnify under the policy, subsequent to a failure to investigate, risk extracontractual liability for consequential economic and noneconomic losses.” Connecticut also provides a statutory remedy against insurers with a “general business practice” of improper investigations. See Connecticut Unfair Insurance Policies Act (CUIPA), Gen. Stat. § 38a-815 et seq. and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), Gen. Stat. § 42-110a et seq.

The court’s decision reflects that an independent basis for bad faith liability was not warranted in this context. As the court explained, “imposing liability for bad faith investigation … would open a new avenue for the litigation of claims that, by definition, are outside of the policy's coverage, and burden our courts with litigation on peripheral issues. … to the extent that the rule would incentivize insurers to investigate meritless claims, these costs would be passed on to all consumers of commercial general liability policies.”



Written by:

Cozen O'Connor

Cozen O'Connor on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.