North Carolina Supreme Court Strikes Down Cyberbullying Statute On Free Speech Grounds

by Poyner Spruill LLP

In State v. Bishop (June 10, 2016),  the Supreme Court of North Carolina reversed a unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals and struck down the state’s cyberbullying statute, N.C.G.S. § 14-458.1 as unconstitutional.

The underlying facts involved two high school students. Defendant Robert Bishop attended Southern Alamance High School. Dillion Price, a contemporary at the school, inadvertently sent out a sexually themed text message. A third classmate posted a screenshot of the message on Facebook. Several individuals, including defendant Bishop, then commented on that post and followups. The defendant’s comments allegedly included statements that (1) Price was “homophobic” and “homosexual” (2) Price’s original message was “excessively homoerotic” and (3) he “never got the chance to slap [Price] down before Christmas break.”

In December 2011, Price’s mother found him crying in his room, punching his pillow and beating his head. After viewing the exchanges, she notified Alamance County law enforcement.

Police arrested Bishop and charged him with one count of cyberbullying in violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-458.1. The warrant alleged that the defendant “unlawfully and willfully did use a computer network to, with the intent to intimidate and torment Dillion Price, a minor, post on the Internet private, personal and sexual information pertaining to the above named minor, to wit, commenting on Facebook about his sexual orientation and his intelligence.”

The defendant was convicted in a jury trial. The North Carolina Court of Appeals upheld the conviction and the Supreme Court granted certiorari. On June 10, 2016, the court unanimously reversed, holding that the cyberbullying statute unconstitutionally restricted speech in violation of the First Amendment. The court reached this conclusion after a three step analysis.

The court first rejected the state’s position that the statute proscribed conduct, and not speech. It noted that the cyberbullying statute made it a crime to (1) post or encourage others to post (2) certain information to the Internet (3) with the intent to intimidate or torment a minor. Therefore, the crime was posting itself – and the court viewed posting as speech. “Posting information on the Internet — whatever the subject matter — can constitute speech as surely as stapling flyers to bulletin boards or distributing pamphlets to passersby — activities long protected by the First Amendment.”

Second, the court found that by its own terms, the law was not content neutral: “The statute criminalizes some messages but not others, and makes it impossible to determine whether the accused has committed a crime without examining the content of his communication.” Consequently, the statute punished speech on the basis of its viewpoint, and was subject to the most stringent scrutiny.

Third, the court concluded that the statute’s sweeping language – including its failure to define “torment” and “personal” – meant the cyberbullying statute could not survive this stringent scrutiny. While protecting a minor’s wellbeing was a compelling government interest, the court was skeptical that “teenagers require protection via the criminal law from online annoyance.” 

The court’s decision is in line with other jurisdictions’ determinations in analogous contexts. For instance, New York’s highest court similarly struck down a cyberbullying provision on parallel constitutional grounds in People v. Marquan M, 19 N.E.3d 480, 488 (N.Y. 2014).

Remarkably however, the Bishop decision rests uneasily with another recent North Carolina Supreme Court opinion involving speech restrictions on the Internet. In State v. Packingham (N.C. 2015), the court affirmed the constitutionality of N.C.G.S. § 14-202.5. That statute prohibits registered sex offenders from using websites available to minors. In Packingham, Defendant Lester Gerard Packingham was convicted of violating the statute by using Facebook – ironically enough to celebrate the dismissal of a traffic ticket. The Court of Appeals held the statute facially unconstitutional, reasoning that it prohibited a wide range of expression unrelated to its stated goal. The Supreme Court reversed.

First, the court noted the law proscribed access to websites. As such, the court viewed it as governing conduct, not speech. Next, it accepted the state’s asserted interest in preventing registered sex offenders from “harvesting information”. Finally, it held that N.C.G.S. § 14-202.5’s restrictions were sufficiently calibrated to the state’s objective to be constitutional.

The court noted registrants were not excluded from all websites. Rather, the ban applied only to websites that were available to minors. This barred registrants from numerous well known sites including Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter, Pinterest, Vine, Tumblr, and However, it allowed alternative means of expression on sites limited to adults. These sites, such as the Paula Deen Network,,, and Shutterfly, provided alternative venues of communication. Moreover, the statute did not affect direct communication such as text message, FaceTime, electronic mail, traditional mail, and phone calls. Since N.C.G.S. § 14-202.5 did not foreclose all communication, it was constitutional.

The divergent outcomes in Bishop and Packingham demonstrate the intricacies that often dictate the disposition of Internet cases. Broadly speaking, the mass of Internet cases involve a simple extrapolation of analogous brick-and-mortar caselaw into the cyber context. At the same time,  courts are also increasingly confronted with scenarios on the jurisprudential frontier: those cases with facts, principles, considerations and implications that no court has dealt with before. Given the legal significance of conduct versus speech in the First Amendment arena, creating a consistent body of law in a technological realm where all speech has elements of conduct and vice versa will be an ongoing challenge for the courts. In these cases, as always, the devil is in the details.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Poyner Spruill LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Poyner Spruill LLP

Poyner Spruill LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.