Not a bargain at twice the price: Court awards attorneys’ fees to victorious copyright defendant

Thompson Coburn LLP

Thompson Coburn LLP

Most lawsuits in the United States follow the American Rule: win or lose, each party pays their own attorney. The Copyright Act is different. The Act allows a “prevailing party” – on either side – to seek recovery of their attorneys’ fees from the lawsuit loser.  Richard Bell, an attorney-photographer who has filed and settled many infringement lawsuits, learned that a loss at trial can be particularly expensive where a court ordered him to pay a defendant’s fees.

In September 2019, a federal jury in Indiana determined that Bell failed to prove that he authored or owned rights to a photo of the Indianapolis skyline at issue in the lawsuit. We previously wrote about defendant Carmen Commercial’s defense verdict. After the jury’s verdict, Carmen Commercial sought its attorneys’ fees from Bell.

Courts look to several factors to determine whether to award fees. Two of the factors are a party’s “objective unreasonableness” and the “need in particular circumstances to advance considerations of compensation and deterrence.”

Judge James Sweeney found that Bell acted unreasonably in settlement negotiations. He noted that “Bell typically licensed the photograph for $200,” and later testified his “actual damages are probably $200.” Nevertheless, Bell sought $150,000 in damages even after Carmen Commercial offered $1,000, or five times Bell’s actual damages, before Bell filed suit.

Judge Sweeney also determined that Bell “used the threat of litigation costs to extract quick settlements,” noting that the “success of such demands – for an amount between 25 times … and 1,000 times … the market value of a license – depends upon litigation costs that render a defendant’s trial victory hollow” and thus a fee award would advance the Copyright Act’s “goals of compensation and deterrence….” After reviewing the defendant’s attorneys’ fees invoices, the court determined they were reasonable and ordered Bell to pay Carmen Commercial all of the more than $172,000 in attorney’s fees and costs it incurred to defeat his claim.

The case shows that the very elements that give photographers power early on in copyright cases – the ability to demand damages and the threat of litigation costs for defendants, as examples – also support attorneys’ fee awards for defendants that win at trial.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Thompson Coburn LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Thompson Coburn LLP

Thompson Coburn LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.