October 2017 Bid Protest Roundup

This month’s bid protest roundup discusses five decisions covering corrective action, an agency’s evaluation discretion, the “late-is-late” rule, intervening at the Court of Federal Claims (COFC), and Small Business Administration (SBA) status protests.  These cases serve as important reminders for protesters and awardees, and identify a few issues that continue to change at the various protest fora.

Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., B-414822.5

Booz Allen protested a General Services Administration (GSA) task order award to Raytheon asserting unmitigated organizational conflicts of interest (OCIs) and a flawed technical evaluation.  Following outcome prediction, during which the Government Accountability Office (GAO) indicated it would likely sustain the protest, GSA took voluntary corrective action.  GSA’s notice of corrective action noted the potential issues concerning OCIs and its evaluation, but, as is customary in such notices, GSA did not bind itself to any particular course of action.  The protester objected to the scope of the corrective action, but GAO dismissed the protest as academic, noting the protester’s right to protest again if it is “dissatisfied with the results of the agency’s corrective action.”

The protester filed another protest the next business day following GAO’s dismissal, arguing that GSA’s proposed corrective action can be interpreted as allowing the agency to ignore the OCI and evaluation flaws identified in its initial protest.  GAO disagreed and dismissed the follow-on protest because: (i) GAO does not consider unsupported allegations of bad faith against government officials and (ii) the protest is in anticipation of adverse agency action and is therefore premature.

This case highlights the sometimes untenable position protesters find themselves in following an agency’s decision to take corrective action.  Often concerned with the breadth of discretion and vagueness of the scope of an agency’s announced corrective action, the protester must assess whether, by not protesting immediately, it is waiving its opportunity to object to the scope of corrective action.  By immediately protesting, however, the protester also risks being summarily dismissed as premature.  Oftentimes, as may have been the case with Booz Allen, the risks of being dismissed as untimely in a protest of a re-award to Raytheon outweighed the risks of its pre-award protest being dismissed as premature.  These types of protective protests are, unfortunately, sometimes necessary to ensure the protester’s right to protest is preserved until after the agency completes its corrective action.

McCann-Erickson USA, Inc., B-414797

Protesters frustrated by an agency’s overly mechanical or finicky evaluation often feel they have been treated unfairly and that the agency has traded substance for form.  Such protesters are usually disappointed at GAO because GAO often rejects arguments that agencies’ evaluations were based on minor or clerical errors in the protesters’ proposals.  GAO has held for time immemorial that it is the offeror’s responsibility to submit a well-written and compliant proposal.  GAO’s decision in McCann-Erickson is a departure from this precedent.

In this case, the Army eliminated McCann’s proposal from phase one of the two phase competition for various supposed noncompliances with the RFP.  At least two of the Army’s reasons were erroneous, but the third noncompliance finding was true:  McCann had submitted its cost/price proposal in PDF format, rather than in MS Excel, as required by the RFP’s instructions.  Notwithstanding recent precedent (see Herman Constr. Grp., Inc., B-408018.2; B-408018.3), GAO here concluded that the Army’s evaluation was unreasonable.  First, GAO found that the RFP did not notify offerors that the Army would reject proposals without performing a substantive evaluation (although the RFP included the boilerplate language that award would be made to an offeror that “conforms to the solicitation requirements”).  Second, GAO placed the onus on the Army to “establish” why it was unable to use the PDF version to evaluate McCann’s cost/price proposal, which the Army failed to do.  Finally, the Army did not adequately explain why allowing McCann to substitute an Excel version would be improper.  It is unusual to place the burden on an agency in a post-award posture to provide a substantive basis for its RFP’s instructions, and this decision is likely to provide fodder for potential protesters that are disappointed in evaluations based on hyper-mechanical or superficial proposal defects.

Lastly, it is noteworthy that this case, like SAIC, B-413501 from last year, notes that it may be possible in certain DoD procurements to successfully challenge an agency’s decision not to initiate discussions.  Under a 2016 DFARs provision, DoD “should” conduct discussions if it is acquiring goods or services valued at more than $100 million.  See DFARs § 215.306(c).  As a result of this provision, GAO seems willing to assess the reasonableness of an agency’s decision to forego discussions in such circumstances.

T Square Logistics Services Corp., COFC No. 17-744

The late-is-late rule provides that proposals received after the date and time set in an RFP may be rejected, and there is notoriously little wiggle room on the application of the rule.  The Court of Federal Claims’ decision in T Square represents the type of factual circumstances necessary for an offeror to overcome the rejection of a late proposal.

In this case, FedEx notified T Square that delivery of its proposal would be delayed due to weather.  The offeror immediately contacted employees to prepare a paper copy for hand delivery to the Air Force.  The offeror also contacted the contracting officer and contract specialist by email to notify the agency of the possible delay, and attached an electronic copy of its proposal to the notification.  The contract specialist responded that the delay was “not a problem” and that the agency “will be able to accept the hard copies when they arrive, even if FedEx delivers them after” the delivery deadline.  Relying on these assurances, the offeror directed its employees not to print or deliver another hard copy.

FedEx did not deliver the proposal until three days later and the Air Force rejected the proposal as late.  The contracting officer explained that the contract specialist’s email, “while good intentioned . . . lacked the authority to materially alter the proposal submission requirements” in the RFP.  T Square pleaded with the Air Force to extend the deadline, but did not receive a response, and filed its protest with the court as a result.

The court found in favor of T Square and enjoined the agency from making award without first re-evaluating the plaintiff’s proposal.  The court concluded that the Air Force’s decision to reverse course from the contract specialist’s direction lacked a rational basis.  The court also noted the consequences of the plaintiff’s reliance on the specialist’s email, and viewed the initial message from the agency as an indication to the plaintiff that the agency viewed the late delivery as a waivable “informality” or “minor irregularity.”

Offerors must ensure the timely delivery of proposals in strict accordance with the RFP’s terms.  Offerors should also have contingency plans in place if the primary mode of delivery is delayed or disrupted.  In addition, offerors should follow T Square’s example by keeping the agency abreast of any difficulties.  No offeror wants to resort to litigation with a potential customer, but having a record of such communications probably saved T Square in this case.

Sonoran Technology and Professional Services, LLC v. United States, COFC No. 17-711C

Sonoran filed a protest at the COFC challenging the Air Force’s decision to terminate its contract with Sonoran and award the contract to Spectre Pursuit Group, LLC (SPG).  The facts and the legal consequences provide significant reminders to awardees about the importance of intervening in a bid protest, and the possible consequences of declining to intervene.

The solicitation required the awardee to have the requisite facility clearance at the time of contract award.  In its proposal, SPG acknowledged that it did not have a facility clearance, which prompted the contracting officer to eliminate SPG from consideration.  SPG filed a protest at GAO that was dismissed.  SPG subsequently filed the first of two protests at COFC arguing that the decision to eliminate SPG amounted to a negative responsibility determination, which required the Air Force to refer the matter to SBA for a Certificate of Competency (COC) review.  In response to the first COFC protest, the Air Force took corrective action by referring the responsibility to SBA for a COC review.  Notably, Sonoran did not request to intervene in the first COFC protest.

SBA notified the Air Force it could not make a responsibility determination because it had already awarded the contract to Sonoran, prompting SPG to file a second protest at COFC.  Once again, Sonoran chose not to request to intervene.  In response to the second COFC protest, SBA agreed to conduct a COC review because SPG’s case presented “unique circumstances,” which included SPG’s filing of a protest, and the Air Force’s commitment in writing to SBA that it would terminate the award to Sonoran once the SBA issued a COC to SPG.

After having its contract terminated and awarded to SPG, Sonoran filed its protest at COFC.  A number of Sonoran’s claims were rejected as untimely, but the challenge to the Air Force’s corrective action and COFC’s corresponding response may have ramifications for awardees going forward.  The Air Force argued that Sonoran’s challenges to corrective action were untimely because Sonoran raised the claims after the Air Force had made its final award.

Sonoran argued that it had no knowledge of the Air Force’s intent to take corrective action or the scope of such corrective action.  According to Sonoran, had it known the details of the corrective action prior to the Air Force’s award to SPG, it would have filed a protest.

The court rejected this contention because, in addition to Sonoran being able to access the notice of corrective action, it could have obtained the necessary information by intervening in both SPG protests.  According to the court:

Sonoran had both ample notice of the proposed corrective action and ample time to challenge it.  For example, Sonoran surely would have learned that corrective action was on the horizon if it had intervened in SPG’s initial bid protest before this Court on November 28, 2016, after the Air Force declined to refer SPG to the SBA for a responsibility determination. . . .   Sonoran also could have intervened in SPG’s second bid protest before this Court on January 6, 2017, after the SBA notified the Air Force and SPG that it could not make a responsibility determination because the contract had already been awarded to Sonoran. . . .  Why Sonoran chose not to intervene in either of these protests is beyond the Court’s comprehension, as Sonoran should have known that its award was at risk of being rescinded and granted to SPG instead as a result of potential corrective action.

An awardee’s intervention in a protest challenging its contract award has always been critical to ensuring that the award and the evaluation are fully protected.  Sonoran serves as a reminder of that, but goes a bit further to suggest that awardees risk waiving certain legal rights if they do not intervene.  The government will defend its award and evaluation, but it will not defend the awardee’s legal interests, particularly when the government’s interests diverge from those of the awardee.  In addition to the motivation to defend a contract award, awardees considering intervening should also consider the risk that they may be imputed with knowledge of agency action occurring during the pendency of the protest.

Sonoran raises additional questions.  For example, can a contractor be charged with knowledge of information that is disclosed under a protective order that is later released as part of the public decision document?  If so, when is the offeror charged with such knowledge?  Also, how does this impact other offerors (i.e., beyond the awardee and protester)?  What if the scope of corrective action adversely affects other offerors’ interests, and how does the court’s holding impact them when, typically, other offerors are not permitted to intervene in protests?

Yard Masters, Inc., SBA No. WOSB-109

Yard Masters serves as a cautionary reminder that a company claiming status as a woman-owned small business (WOSB) must ensure that its corporate documents match its structure, and that the documents and the structure are compliant with the applicable regulations.

The Army set aside a contract for maintenance services for WOSBs, and awarded the contract to Yard Masters, Inc. (YMI).  A competitor filed a WOSB status protest with SBA arguing that YMI was ineligible for award because YMI was not majority-owned and controlled by a woman, but was instead majority-owned and controlled by the woman’s husband.

YMI admitted that the woman’s husband was previously the majority owner, but contended that YMI currently qualified as a WOSB because he sold stock to his wife, giving her 51% of the outstanding ownership interests.  To refute the allegation regarding control, YMI proffered the wife’s résumé and corporate meeting minutes demonstrating that she was the chief executive officer.

SBA’s review of YMI’s corporate documents revealed that no CEO position was ever created and no duties were assigned to the CEO.  Rather, the corporate documents designated a President of the company – a position that was held by the woman’s husband – as the “chief executive and administrative officer of the corporation.”  SBA had additional evidence to undermine YMI’s contention that the wife controlled the company, but it largely served to confirm SBA’s finding that the husband had the right to control the company as its president.  The SBA Area Office concluded that YMI did not qualify as a WOSB because it was not controlled by a woman.

YMI appealed the decision to SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) and argued that YMI’s meeting minutes demonstrated that the wife had ultimate control over the company as its CEO.  OHA disagreed because “the Board did not formally create a position of CEO” and “[t]he Bylaws were never changed to add the position of CEO.”  Instead, “[t]he Bylaws clearly state that the President is the corporation’s ‘chief administrative and executive officer,’” which was a position held by the husband.  In addition to citing the ancillary evidence presented by SBA, OHA also noted that the husband had communicated with the SBA Area Office in response to the protest.  OHA denied the appeal and upheld the SBA Area Office’s decision.

YMI is a reminder that accurate and compliant corporate documentation is as important as the day-to-day company operations.  Contractors and their advisers must have a complete understanding of the regulations that govern a company’s pursuit, receipt, and performance of set-aside government contracts.  Furthermore, the company and its board must adopt resolutions that are consistent with the corporate documents and day-to-day management.

Lastly, YMI reminds us that the individual in control of the company should be signing important corporate documents and controlling communications with outside entities.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government Contracts Insights | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government Contracts Insights

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government Contracts Insights on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.