Offers to Buy Real Estate Via Text Message May Violate the TCPA

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP
Contact

The Northern District of Georgia has been at the center of Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) litigation over the past month. As our readers know, a Georgia federal judge recently found that text messages are not telephone calls for purposes of the TCPA. In another recent decision from the same Court, a Georgia federal judge denied a motion to dismiss, finding that offers to purchase real estate via text message (“Real Estate Texts”) could be construed as telephone solicitations under the TCPA. We discuss the decision in detail below, and what it means for companies that deliver real estate calls/texts to homeowners.

Georgia Court Finds Real Estate Texts Are Telephone Solicitations Under the TCPA

Plaintiff Veronica Bramlett (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of herself and a putative class, filed a lawsuit against two real estate companies (“Defendants”) in the Northern District of Georgia alleging TCPA Do-Not-Call (“DNC”) registry violations. Although Plaintiff’s telephone number was on the DNC registry, the Complaint alleges that Defendants delivered Real Estate Texts to her to inquire as to whether she was interested in selling her property. As a result, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit asserting that the subject Real Estate Texts violated the TCPA. In response, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss arguing, among other things, that the Real Estate Texts at issue were not telephone solicitations within the meaning of the TCPA. The Court disagreed and denied Defendants’ motion.  

In denying Defendants’ dismissal motion, the Court found that it could be inferred from the allegations set forth in the Complaint that the Real Estate Texts were advertising real estate-related services, not merely offers to purchase Plaintiff’s property. Viewing the Real Estate Texts in their totality, the Court found that they, coupled with Defendants’ purported business model, plausibly alleged that the text messages constituted telephone solicitations because they encouraged Plaintiff to purchase Defendants’ related real estate services.

Hiring Experienced Attorneys Matters

When evaluating a motion to dismiss, it bears mentioning that courts are required to assume the truth of the allegations pled in a complaint and are not allowed to look beyond the four corners of a complaint (except in limited circumstances). This fact is critical when determining how to respond to a complaint. Notwithstanding the ruling of the Court, this decision highlights the importance of hiring experienced attorneys. Significantly, had Defendants’ counsel argued that text messages are not telephone calls under the TCPA (as this very Court recently concluded), Defendants’ motion to dismiss likely would have been granted.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Written by:

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • Increased readership
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing writing guidance

Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide