Ohio District Court Decertifies Class of Health Care Workers in Meal Break Case

by BakerHostetler

We’ve commented several times in the past on the importance of the second phase of the two-step procedure now commonly employed by district courts in Fair Labor Standards Act cases.  Under that procedure, courts will typically apply a lenient standard for “conditional certification,” really notice to the class, at the first stage. Following an opt-in period, the defendant may then file a motion to decertify the class, at which time a higher standard applies. While plaintiffs often prevail at the first stage, those cases that reach the second stage, or even the eve of trial, are frequently decertified as demonstrated by a recent decision from the Northern District of Ohio.

In Creely v. HCR ManorCare, Inc., Case No. 3:09:CV2879 (N.D. Ohio, Jan. 31, 2013), the defendant employer operated hundreds of long- and short-term rehabilitation facilities across the United States and employed over 44,000 hourly exempt employees in positions such as registered nurses, LPNs, nursing assistants, and administrative functions. The employer employed an “auto-deduct” policy for meal periods, deducting 30 minutes unless the employee who missed their meal completed a form advising it of that fact. 

Such policies, incidentally, are used by many employers because of their general ease of administration and because many employees, particularly those in professional or paraprofessional positions, would prefer not to be required to “punch in” or “punch out” for breaks or meals throughout the day. Despite their popularity, such policies are frequent targets for wage and hour claims. These claims, like those asserted in the Creely case, generally allege that such policies place the burden of timekeeping on the employee (which would be true of the need to punch in or out in any event) or that they were subtly or even overtly discouraged from reporting missed meal periods.

In 2009, the district court conditionally certified the case under the lighter, first-step of the procedure. Creely v. HRC ManorCare Inc., 789 F. Supp. 2d 819 (N.D. Ohio 2009). Interestingly, rather than provide notice to the entire proposed class, notice was only sent to approximately 3200 employees, of whom about 10% opted in, a relatively low rate. Discovery was conducted on roughly 20% of that group, as well as on how the company’s auto-deduct policy was implemented at the various locations. Following the additional discovery, the defendant moved to decertify the class and the plaintiff filed a motion to “confirm” the prior conditional certification.

The district court found that while the employer had a uniform “auto deduct” policy, the manner in which it was implemented varied based upon the facility, type of employee, and even individual manager. Further, the ability to take uninterrupted meal periods varied based upon the type of work the employee performed. The court was also persuaded that while the employer automatically deduct time for meals, it had several policies reflecting the employee’s right either to take their meal at a different time or to override the deduction through the submission of a form. It noted several other cases in which courts had decertified such cases in the past, including Frye v. Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc., 2012 WL 3570657 (6th Cir. 2012), as well as cases from many other district courts. It likewise found that the employer’s defenses varied among the employees and that, as a result, treatment of the case as a collective action would be difficult to manage.

The court thus decertified the case and dismissed the claims of all of the opt-in plaintiffs with prejudice.

While the ending was a positive result for the employer, the Creely case demonstrates the growing difficulty with using an overly low burden at the first stage. Even on inspection, it is obvious that a 300-facility, 44,000-employee class is going to have difficulties surviving the second stage analysis. That is particularly true when the employer’s policy is facially lawful and the plaintiffs are asserting “off-the-clock” or similar issues that are almost inherently individual. In this case, the parties were in litigation for years, took dozens of depositions across the country, and now have to manage the after-effects of a decertified group of over 300 opt-in plaintiffs. Courts should consider the likelihood that the class can actually meet the higher standard, and the cost and inconvenience to the parties through the second stage before relying solely on a recitation of the discretionary lower standard at the first phase.

Elements path

The bottom line: Another court has decertified a wage and hour case challenging the employer’s use of an “auto-deduct” policy based on differences in the manner in which it was implemented.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© BakerHostetler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


BakerHostetler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.