Ohio mini-WARN Act expands requirements employers must follow in mass layoffs

Freeman Mathis & Gary
Contact

Freeman Mathis & Gary

As more layoffs are announced in the news, it’s a good time for Ohio employers to be sure they are complying with federal and state notice requirements. While many human resource officers are familiar with the federal WARN requirements, they may not realize a new law went into effect in Ohio on September 29, 2025. This mini-WARN law supplements the obligations employers have under federal WARN.

The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) was passed in 1988 and generally applies to employers with at least 100 employees. WARN requires covered employers to provide at least 60 days’ notice of plant closures and mass layoffs. Employers who do not provide the requisite notice can be liable for back pay, benefits, and penalties. As a result, failing to follow the requirements set by both federal WARN and Ohio’s mini-WARN can be costly.

When it applies and who is covered

Just as with federal WARN, Ohio’s mini-WARN applies when a covered employer foresees a plant closing or mass layoff (affecting 50 or more employees within thirty days). An employer is covered if it has at least 100 employees (excluding certain part‑time employees as defined by the Act), or if it has 100 or more employees in total whose combined weekly hours exceed 4,000, not counting overtime. Notice is required if the employer meets the 4,000-hour threshold and lays off 50 or more employees at a single site within 30 days. Ohio’s statute omits the federal 33% workforce impact test, creating ambiguity despite language suggesting Ohio’s mini-WARN has a standard that is no different from federal law. It remains to be seen how this ambiguity plays out.

Expanded recipients – who must be notified

Notices must go to all of the following: (1) Affected employees or their union representatives; (2) the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services Director; (3) the chief elected official of both the municipality and the county where the event occurs. Federal WARN does not require separate notice to both municipal and county officials, so this mandate is new for Ohio employers.

Expanded content – what must be included

Ohio law tailors the content requirements by recipient and expands mandatory details. Union employee notices must include the facility location, whether the action is permanent or temporary, timing, and numbers with job titles and departments. Non-union employee notices must include reasons, timing, bumping or reemployment rights and procedures, UI and assistance information, a contact, and available services. State and local official notices must include all employee and union information, mitigation efforts, labor organization details, and a copy of the employee notice. Unlike federal WARN, the Ohio statute does not permit a short-form notice to governmental recipients.

Notice Timing and Exceptions

Just as federal WARN, Ohio generally requires 60 days’ advance written notice and adopts federal exceptions. There are recognized exceptions which include unforeseeable business circumstances, faltering business, natural disasters, and strikes or lockouts. However, shortened or delayed notice must be as soon as practicable and explain the reason for notice that is less than 60 days.

Penalties, Remedies, and Enforcement

Failure to follow federal and Ohio mini-WARN requirements can cost employers back pay and benefits for affected employees up to 60 days. Civil penalties up to $500/day for each day of violation, fines, and potential recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs are also available. Ohio’s law does not add a separate state civil penalty or independent state enforcement authority.

Action Items for Employers

To stay compliant, Ohio employers should (1) train HR and legal teams on both federal and Ohio WARN requirements; (2) update reduction in force procedures to address expanded recipients and detailed content obligations; (3) build timelines to ensure delivery of at least 60 days’ notice; (4) consult counsel early; and (5) treat decisions for layoffs/plant closures with heightened scrutiny and document decisions to reduce risk.

[View source.]

Written by:

Freeman Mathis & Gary
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

Freeman Mathis & Gary on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide