OIG Delivers Home Care a One – Two Punch: Release of Report and Alert on Home Health Fraud Highlights Increased OIG Scrutiny of Home Care Agencies

by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP


On June 22, 2016, the Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) issued two communications that underscore its continued focus on fraud in home health care, along with the role of physicians as “gate keepers” in authorizing Medicare-covered services and facilitating improper billing across the care spectrum. 

First, in its report entitled “Nationwide Analysis of Common Characteristics in OIG Home Health Fraud Cases” (the “Report”) the OIG examined 2014—2015 Medicare home health claims data and identified certain home health agencies (“HHAs”), supervising physicians, and geographic areas associated with Medicare claims having “characteristics similar to those observed by OIG in cases of home health fraud.”  OIG highlighted five characteristics commonly found in OIG-investigated cases of home health fraud, and found that 5% of HHAs and 1% of supervising physicians were “statistical outliers” for these characteristics.  OIG also identified geographic “hotspots” in which there was a high prevalence of outliers.  While the OIG offers the caveat that these characteristics are “not necessarily indicative of fraudulent activity,” they do “warrant greater scrutiny,” according to OIG.

Second, in a companion alert entitled “Alert: Improper Arrangements and Conduct Involving Home Health Agencies and Physicians” (the “Alert”), the OIG warns about possible fraud associated with the compensation arrangements between HHAs and physicians, under which the physician, in a position to make referrals to the HHA, is paid to serve as “medical director” at a level above “fair market value,” and without providing bona fide services to the agency.  The OIG noted that in the past year, the Federal government obtained criminal convictions and reached civil settlements with HHAs and physicians that defrauded Medicare by “making (or accepting) payments for patient referrals, falsely certifying patients as homebound, and billing for medically unnecessary services or for services that were not rendered.” 

The Report as well as the Alert foreshadows increased OIG scrutiny and underscores the need to review and remediate any improper arrangements or billing practices -- before the next round of OIG action. 

The Report

OIG identified 562 HHAs -- 5%-- and 4,502 physicians who supervise home health care --1%-- as statistical outliers on two or more characteristics commonly found in OIG-investigated cases of home health fraud.  OIG noted that while there was no finding of fraud and there may be “legitimate explanations” for why these providers were outliers, “further scrutiny” of such conduct is warranted.  OIG also determined that there were 27 geographic “hotspots” in 12 States with statistical outliers in two or more of the characteristics.  According to the OIG, 119 physicians and one HHA were outliers in New York, Northern New Jersey and Long Island. 

Below are the five characteristics identified by OIG as correlated with home health fraud:

  1. High Percentage of Episodes for which the Beneficiary had No Recent Visits (6 months) with the Supervising Physician

    470 HHAs and 16,789 physicians were identified as outliers on this characteristic.  OIG explained that, based on its prior fraud investigations, this characteristic may signal that the supervising physician “did not appropriately evaluate the beneficiary’s medical condition” before certifying eligibility for home care and may evidence the use of “recruiters” to collect Medicare numbers for use in fraudulent billing.
  1. High Percentage of Home Health Episodes that were Not Preceded by a Hospital Or Nursing Home Stay (Within 30 Days)

    1,751 physicians were found to be outliers.  OIG acknowledged that beneficiaries may legitimately require home care in situations other than upon a discharge from an institutional care setting.  Nevertheless, OIG noted that this characteristic may indicate that the home health ordered by the physician is not medically necessary, citing the situation of recruiters soliciting unqualified patients from the community for home care services. 
  1. High Percentage of Episodes with a Primary Diagnosis of Diabetes or Hypertension

    483 HHAs and 7,937 physicians were identified as outliers on this characteristic.  According to OIG, past investigations have revealed HHAs and physicians providing medically unnecessary care, with a disproportionate mix of those patients reported to have diabetes or hypertension as their primary diagnosis.
  1. High Percentage of Beneficiaries with Claims from Multiple HHAs (3 or more HHAs within 2 years)

    OIG cited 770 HHAs and 7,510 physicians as outliers on this characteristic.  This characteristic is common in home health fraud because, OIG has found, “recruiters” move beneficiaries from agency to agency “to avoid suspicion or obtain more favorable financial arrangements for fraudulent billing.” 
  1. High Percentage of Beneficiaries with Multiple Home Health Readmissions in a Short Period of Time (under 2 years)

778 HHAs and 3,822 physicians were outliers.  OIG explained that it has previously uncovered situations where HHAs and physicians tried to hide the lengthy duration of home care covered by Medicare by “periodically discharging and re-enrolling” their beneficiaries.

OIG’s Follow Up

OIG intends to further investigate and audit the “outliers” and to continue closely watching the geographic “hotspots” for potential home health fraud.  OIG warns that it looks forward to “continued collaboration with CMS, DOJ, States and private-sector partners” to fight home health fraud, waste, and abuse.

The Alert

In the Alert, the OIG expressed its concern that HHAs may be rewarding physicians for referrals by hiring and paying them as “medical directors” under “sham” arrangements.  The federal Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) prohibits both the offering and receiving of payments, directly or indirectly, for referrals of patients insured by a Federal health care program.  42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b.  Consequently, both the HHA and the physician can be liable, regardless of who instigates the kickback arrangement.

The Alert in particular cautions that suspect compensation arrangements between a HHA and a physician employed as medical director may violate the AKS so long as one purpose is to remunerate the physician for his or her past or future referrals, noting the potential for “corruption of medical judgment, patient steering, increased costs to Federal health care programs, and unfair competition,” irrespective of the quality of care.  The Alert advises that HHAs and physicians ensure that their arrangements are genuine and that the associated compensation reflects “fair market value” and is “commercially reasonable” -- the hallmarks of the “personal services” safe harbor (42 C.F.R. § 1001.952(d)) under the AKS. 

The Alert is another iteration of the continued oversight of providers’ business relationships with physicians.  Notably, last year, OIG issued a similar alert about physician compensation arrangements, highlighting recent settlements with physicians who entered “questionable medical directorship” with providers.  Moreover, in October of last year, the Department of Justice settled Stark law-related claims against the Tuomey Healthcare System.  U.S. ex rel. Drakeford v. Tuomey, 792 F.3d 364 (4th Cir. 2015).  The Department of Justice alleged that Tuomey had illegally billed the Medicare program for hospital services referred by physicians who were tainted by improper financial relationships with the hospitals.  After judgment in the amount of $237 million was sustained on appeal, the parties settled for $72.4 million. 

In addition to suspect compensation arrangements, the Alert points to other types of home health fraud uncovered by the government:  (i) HHAs have often billed Medicare for medically unnecessary nursing services provided to patients who were not confined to the home; (ii) physicians have “upcoded patient visits;” (iii) physicians billed for oversight services that were not provided; and (iv) physicians falsely certified patients as confined to the home when they were not actually homebound. 

Take Aways for Providers

With continued focus on fraud and abuse in the home health industry, HHAs should consider steps to minimize risks going forward.  In particular, providers can incorporate the five characteristics identified by the OIG into their compliance reviews and audit plans.  Should those reviews find high “outlier” rates with respect to any of these characteristics, HHAs should examine the record support for representative claims, to verify that the services were medically necessary and to determine whether any of the claims were improper and should be refunded or self-disclosed.  Additionally, HHAs should review their contracts with physicians, particularly medical directors, to confirm that the compensation terms are based on fair market value and are commercially reasonable, and that the physicians are actually providing the services they were ostensibly hired to perform.   Depending upon the results of the reviews, HHAs may need to investigate further to determine the root cause and scope of any potential concerns and take additional remedial action to prevent recurrences.

With the Report and OIG’s companion Alert, the OIG has now given HHAs a roadmap of its “red flags” for home health fraud.  Providers who do not follow this roadmap in their compliance activities may be exposed to future OIG action and the risk of False Claims Act liability.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.