Lee v. Tam

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari - Brief for Respondent Simon Shiao Tam

Ronald Coleman
Contact

Simon Shiao Tam's response to the government's request that the U.S. Supreme Court review the decision in In re Tam, 808 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2015), as corrected (Feb 11, 2016). In that case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held, in reversing the Trademark Trials and Appeal Board of the Patent and Trademark Office's refusal to register the trademark THE SLANTS to our client Simon Tam, that Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act's prohibition against registration of "disparaging" trademarks is unconstitutional under the First Amendment.

This response, primarily credited to Stuart Banner and Eugene Volokh from the UCLA School of Law Supreme Court Clinic, to the government's request for a writ of certiorari expands the discussion beyond In re Tam.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info: Appellate Brief | Federal, U.S. Supreme Court | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ronald Coleman, Dhillon Law Group, Inc | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ronald Coleman
Contact
more
less

Dhillon Law Group, Inc on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.