Online Video Services Prompt FCC to Ask for Comments on Definition of MVPD

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Contact

As technology changes, the definitions in the FCC rules don't always keep up.  In a public notice released last Friday, the FCC asked for public comment on what its definition of an "MVPD" - Multichannel Video Programming Distributor - means for purposes of its program access rules. These rules limit exclusive contracts for certain programming that one would normally think of as network cable programming, in order to make that programming available to competing distribution technologies (see this discussion of the application of these rules).  Traditionally, these rules (set out in Section 76.1000-76.1004 of the FCC's Rules) have been thought to require access to this programming by cable, satellite and other companies with their own distribution facilities (i.e. their own wires or spectrum licenses).  Now, with so much video being delivered over the Internet, companies have begun to offer cable-like services by IP-based delivery mechanisms, and they want access to that programming.  Because of these demands for program access, the FCC has asked for these comments.

The proceeding is summarized more thoroughly in our firms Advisory, available here.  As set out in the advisory, the issues on which the FCC is asking for comment could have broader implications should these IP-based systems be deemed to be MVPDs.  For television broadcasters, such a definitional change could signal the need to reexamine the rules regarding the carriage of local television stations, including whether the must-carry and retransmission consent scheme would have to be grafted onto these Internet-delivered services, a requirement that has thus far been rejected by courts and the FCC.  A reexamination of these definitions, should it occur, could have broad implications.  Comments are due on this matter on April 30, with replies due on May 30. 

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Contact
more
less

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.