OPR Mulls Changes in CEQA Traffic Metrics

by Miller Starr Regalia

As previously discussed in this blog, last year’s passage of SB 743 added a requirement in Public Resources Code § 21099(b) that the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) develop new CEQA guidelines “for determining the significance of transportation impacts of projects within transit priority areas.” (See “CEQA, Sausages, And The Art of The Possible: A Closer Look at SB 743’s General CEQA Reform Provisions,” posted September 16, 2013; “OPR To Review Specific CEQA Guidelines Topics Proposed for 2014 Update, Solicits Public Input,” posted January 29, 2014.) The impetus behind this change is to find an alternative to the familiar and currently prevalent “level of service” (or “LOS”) standard for analyzing traffic impacts.

On December 30, 2013, OPR issued its “Preliminary Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Transportation Analysis” (“Analysis”), a document summarizing the alternatives to the LOS methodology that OPR is considering and calling for comments on the same. (See the document at http://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/PreliminaryEvaluationTransportationMetrics.pdf.) Comments are due by tomorrow, February 14, 2014.

LOS measures traffic impacts by focusing on roadway congestion, i.e., the degree of delay vehicles experience at intersections and on roadway segments. But it has been subject to a number of criticisms, not the least of which is that it fails to comport with current goals in land use and environmental law, such as reducing overall emissions and promoting infill development. OPR’s Analysis also identifies further perceived problems with LOS, including:

  • It is difficult and expensive to calculate.
  • It is biased against “last in” development (i.e., a later project that moves the LOS across the threshold of significance bears all of the responsibility for mitigation, even though earlier projects contributed to the congestion).
  • The LOS scale of analysis is too small.
  • LOS mitigation is problematic because it tends to force growth outward and increases roadway vehicle capacity, which in turn may increase vehicle demand.
  • LOS penalizes other forms of transit due to perceived incompatibility with vehicular traffic.
  • LOS gives rise to a false sense of precision, since it is quantifiable yet based on estimates rather than hard data.
  • LOS focuses on motorist convenience rather than impacts on the environment.

Based on these asserted shortcomings and SB 743’s mandate, OPR has proposed the following alternatives to LOS.

  • Vehicle Miles Traveled (“VMT”). VMT counts the number of miles traveled in vehicular trips generated by the project. It thus allows for reductions based on transit-centered and infill development located close to employment and retail nodes.
  • Automobile Trips Generated (“ATG”). ATG is similar to VMT except that it only counts the number of trips generated and not their length. It is the easiest metric to calculate but obviously doesn’t capture all of the impacts of a project (emissions, etc.).
  • Multi-Modal Level of Service (“MMLOS”). MMLOS operates like LOS in that it measures “user comfort” in traveling (congestion and delay being deleterious to that comfort), but it includes modes other than vehicular traffic (transit, walking, biking).
  • Fuel Use. Fuel use quantifies traffic impacts by measuring the amount of fuel used in project-related travel. It thus seeks to capture benefits from transit, biking, etc., while also being tied to emission standards.
  • Motor Vehicle Hours Traveled (“VHT”). Similar to VMT and ATG, VHT seeks to quantify traffic impacts but does so using time as its unit of measurement. This has the benefit of including trip length and duration, which would include congestion. But whether VHT can be accurately calculated is still an open question.
  • Presumption of less-than-significant impact based on location. This proposal would encourage “[d]evelopment in centrally-located areas and areas served by transit generally” by essentially exempting such projects from traffic-related environmental analysis. This is obviously not a standalone approach and would still require use of some traffic metric for projects outside the preferred areas.

Each of the alternatives being considered  has its strengths and weaknesses, and it will be interesting to see how the governmental, environmental, legal, and developer constituencies, including their technical consultants, respond to OPR’s proposals in the forthcoming comments. As noted above, the deadline for those comments is tomorrow, February 14, 2014, although the draft guideline is not due until July 1, 2014. OPR clearly wants to get ahead of the alternative traffic methodology issue as it will undoubtedly attract considerable attention and controversy going forward.

The potential for controversy is amplified given the new guideline’s contemplated – and expansive – reach.  Note that while SB 743 speaks in terms of “establishing criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts of projects within transit priority areas” (Pub. Res. Code, § 21099(b)(1)), it also allows for the implementation of an LOS alternative “for transportation outside transit priority areas.” (Pub. Res. Code, § 21099(c)(1).) OPR makes it clear in the Analysis that its new metric will be implemented broadly and not just in transit priority areas. Thus, OPR’s ultimate decisions have the potential to entirely reshape the environmental consulting industry’s approach to measuring traffic impacts under CEQA on a statewide basis.

Written by:

Miller Starr Regalia

Miller Starr Regalia on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.