Oregon Enacts Significant Amendment to Environmental Clean-Up Insurance Statute

by K&L Gates LLP
Contact

On June 10, 2013, Governor John Kitzhaber of Oregon signed into law a significant amendment to the Oregon Environmental Cleanup Assistance Act, ORS 465.475 et seq. (the “OECAA Amendment”). The OECAA Amendment codifies the holdings of many courts around the country regarding the interpretation and application of certain key provisions of general liability insurance policies to claims for coverage for environmental liabilities. The OECAA Amendment also prohibits certain specified “unfair claims settlement practices” by insurers and permits an aggrieved policyholder to pursue an award of damages from an insurer that engages in such practices. This new law should serve to reduce the number of obstacles that insurers may place in front of Oregon companies that are seeking insurance coverage for the costs of clean-up at the Portland Harbor Superfund site, as well as other environmental remediation sites throughout Oregon. 

Background

CGL Policies
Throughout much of the 20th Century, insurers issued comprehensive general liability (“CGL”) policies to businesses and other entities, which policies provided very broad coverage for liability for bodily injury and damage to the property of others, subject only to certain specified exclusions and limits. These CGL policies often require the insurer not only to indemnify the policyholder for such liabilities, but also to defend any “suit” against the policyholder asserting such liability. Historical CGL policies were typically “occurrence” policies, and not “claims-made” policies – meaning that the policies would respond to liabilities arising out of damage or injury that took place during the policy period, even if the liability claim against the policyholder was not asserted until many decades after the policy period had expired. Such is the case with many so-called “long-tail” environmental claims that have been asserted against Oregon companies. 

As scientific knowledge regarding environmental contamination developed in the latter part of the 20th Century, laws were enacted pursuant to which federal and state environmental agencies have ordered the remediation of contaminated sites throughout the country. In Oregon,  statutes such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (or the “Superfund Act”) and the Oregon state counterpart, ORS 465.200, et seq., have given rise to government agencies requiring both private and public bodies to investigate and remediate environmental contamination that may have been caused by their (or their predecessors’) historical operations and practices. Companies that have been the subjects of these government mandates have turned to their historical CGL insurers for insurance coverage to assist in funding the costly clean-ups that have been required.[2]

In response to such requests for coverage, insurers frequently deny coverage on a variety of grounds, including the following:

  • Missing Policies: In many cases, the environmental damage for which the policyholder is seeking coverage commenced many decades ago. The policyholder may not have maintained copies of its CGL policies from that time period. In those circumstances, and even when the policyholder may have other kinds of historical business records and other evidence reflecting the missing policies, an insurer that issued a policy may contend that it has no coverage obligation;
  • No “Suit”: Insurers often argued that a government-ordered environmental clean-up was not a “suit” in the traditional sense of a lawsuit filed in court, and thus they had no duty to defend policyholders faced with this type of governmental action; and
  • Voluntary” Payments Not Covered: Insurers often have contended that payments made by a policyholder in response to a consent order with a government agency were not covered “liabilities” that were imposed upon the policyholder, but rather were “voluntary payments” – and thus not intended to be covered by a liability policy.

As a result of these and other coverage defenses asserted by insurers, policyholders often have been forced to initiate costly and time-consuming coverage litigation to enforce their contractual coverage rights under their historical CGL policies. While such coverage litigation dragged on for years, policyholders were incurring substantial – and possibly enterprise-threatening – costs to investigate and remediate the environmental contamination at issue. Meanwhile, insurers had little incentive to resolve their coverage disputes with policyholders in a timely fashion. 

To address some of the difficulties in insurance recovery being experienced by Oregon policyholders, the Oregon Legislature enacted the OECAA in 1999.

The OECAA
The Oregon Environmental Cleanup Assistance Act is a statute designed to clarify the interpretation of certain insurance language upon which insurers have based some of their defenses to environmental coverage claims. Notably, the OECAA is not limited to claims asserted by Oregon residents. Rather, it applies to any policyholder that is a potentially responsible party for the clean-up of a contaminated site located in Oregon.[3] The legislative purpose of the OECAA is stated as follows:

“465.478 Legislative findings. The Legislative Assembly finds that there are many insurance coverage disputes involving insureds who face potential liability for their ownership of or roles at polluted sites in this state. The State of Oregon has a substantial public interest in promoting the fair and efficient resolution of environmental claims while encouraging voluntary compliance and regulatory cooperation.” [1999 c. 783 § 3.]

To that end, the OECAA, among other things, provides as follows:

  • Insurers are required to cooperate with a policyholder to reconstruct missing policies. Specifically, insurers are required to: (i) perform a search for lost policies within 30 days of receiving a notice of lost policy from the policyholder, (ii) provide the non-privileged results of that search, and (iii) if no policy is found, provide policy forms issued by the insurer during the applicable policy period that are potentially applicable to the environmental claim.[4] Under the statute, the policyholder must prove the issuance of the missing policy by a preponderance of the evidence.[5] Once the policy is shown to have been issued, the burden is on the insurer to prove that any exclusion of coverage for pollution or contamination was contained in the policy.
  • OECAA provides general rules of construction for certain ambiguous or undefined policy terms in liability policies so long as the rules do not undermine the intent of the parties. For example:
    • The statute interprets the term “suit” in the context of an environmental claim under a CGL policy broadly to include instances when a governmental agency “directs, requests or agrees that a policyholder take action with respect to contamination with the State of Oregon.”[6]
    • The statute provides that environmental investigation or remediation costs incurred by a policyholder pursuant to a written voluntary agreement or consent decree with the DEQ or EPA may not be denied by an insurer on the ground that such expense constitutes voluntary payments by the policyholder.[7]
    • The statute also addresses an insurer’s duty to pay under a CGL policy that provides for “all sums” coverage. Under these policies, the insurer is liable for all defense and indemnity costs, up to a policy’s limit of liability, regardless of the existence of any other applicable insurance that may provide coverage for the same claim.[8] This provision prevents an insurer from avoiding a portion of its coverage obligations by arguing that the liabilities should be allocated pro rata among all triggered policies.

The OECAA Amendment
Notwithstanding the positive impact of the original OECAA in clarifying the policy language upon which insurers have based certain of their coverage defenses – including those policyholders that are taking responsibility to clean up the Portland Harbor Superfund Site – a number of policyholders continued to experience denials of coverage, significant delays and general frustration over insurers’ improper claims-handling practices.[9] The OECAA Amendment, introduced in the Oregon Legislature as Senate Bill 814, was designed to address some of these issues. Importantly, the OECAA Amendment is retroactive, “apply[ing] to all environmental claims, whether arising before, on or after the effective date [of the] Act.”[10]

Like the OECAA, the OECAA Amendment provides rules of construction for certain ambiguous or undefined policy terms and provisions in CGL policies that have been the basis for insurers seeking to delay or deny coverage.  Also like the original law, these new rules of construction are subject to a “savings clause,” which provides that the interpretive rules “do not apply if the application of the rule results in an interpretation contrary to the intent of the parties to the [insurance policy in question].”[11]

Below is a summary of some of the principal features of the OECAA Amendment.

New Rules of Construction

Consent-to-Assignment Clauses
Many historical CGL policies contain a provision stating that a policyholder may not assign an “interest in the policy” without the consent of the insurer. Insurers have argued that this provision requires the policyholder to obtain consent for the assignment of claims for coverage that have already accrued under the policy – as well as for assignment of rights to coverage under the policy for future events.[12] This insurers’ argument was particularly troublesome for companies that had acquired or merged with other companies whose historical operations were not considered environmentally problematic during the period of those operations, but later were determined to have contaminated the environment. Under the insurers’ interpretation of the consent-to-assignment clause, the surviving company would not be able to access the predecessor company’s historical CGL policies because the predecessor never had obtained the insurers’ consent to the assignment of its coverage claims to the surviving company, even though the damage had already occurred – and therefore the right of the predecessor to collect coverage under the policy had already accrued – prior to the assignment.

The case law in Oregon on the issue of assigning insurance policy rights was arguably somewhat uncertain.[13] The OECAA Amendment clarifies this issue. Specifically, it provides that the standard consent-to-assignment clause in CGL policies may not be construed to prevent the assignment of environmental coverage claims under a policy after the damage has already taken place – and thus after the claim against the insurer issuing the policy has already accrued. This provision of the Amendment is in accord with the holdings of many courts around the country to the effect that consent-to-assignment provisions were intended to prevent insurers from being involuntarily required to insure a materially increased risk resulting from the assignment of a policy, but such provisions were not intended to impede assignment of an already-accrued claim for coverage for a past incident because such assignment did not materially increase the risk of the insurer.

Non-Cumulation Provisions
Some liability policies contain a “prior insurance and non-cumulation of liability” provision, which states that if any loss covered by the policy is also covered in whole or in part under any policy issued for a prior period, the policy limits shall be reduced by any amounts due under such prior policies. Policyholders have argued that this provision was drafted by insurers with the intention of preventing a policyholder from obtaining a “double recovery” of insurance payments for the same loss – i.e., receiving coverage payments for the same liability from different insurance policies, for a total recovery in excess of the amount of the loss. Notwithstanding that original intent, some insurers have attempted to apply this provision to a long-tail environmental claim – where damage occurs over multiple policy periods – in a manner that would reduce or eliminate the coverage available to a policyholder from a subsequently issued policy by virtue of the issuance of an earlier policy that also provides coverage for the environmental claim – even in a situation where the liability is so large that the policyholder must collect coverage from both the earlier policy and the subsequent policy to be fully reimbursed for that liability.

The OECAA Amendment makes clear that the non-cumulation provision may not be construed to reduce the limits of coverage under a policy simply on grounds that a previously issued policy also potentially provides coverage for the same environmental loss. Specifically, the Amendment provides that the standard non-cumulation clause in CGL policies may not be interpreted to reduce the policy limits for a policyholder that has filed a “long-tail environmental claim,” which is defined in the statute as “an environmental claim covered by multiple general liability insurance policies.” By virtue of this provision of the OECAA Amendment, insurers cannot continue in their attempts to interpret and apply a non-cumulation provision in their policies as an “escape” clause, which voids their coverage responsibility simply because an earlier-issued insurance policy also has coverage obligations for the same environmental loss.

Owned Property Exclusion
CGL policies provide coverage for a policyholder’s liability for damage to another’s property, but they do not typically cover damage to the policyholder’s own property. Thus, these policies often contain “owned property” exclusions, which state that there is no coverage for losses to property “owned” by the insured. In the context of environmental contamination claims, damaged property often includes public waterways, the material below the water in these waterways (called “sediments”), groundwater and soil. Oregon law is clear that public waterways, sediments beneath such waterways and groundwater are owned by the public, and not by any particular policyholder.[14] Accordingly, the “owned property” exclusion should not apply to liability for costs associated with damage to these types of third party property.

The issue of soil contamination on property owned by the policyholder, however, has been the subject of some debate between policyholders and insurers. Policyholders typically argue that coverage for the cost of remediating their own soil is not barred by the owned property exclusion if that remediation is designed to prevent threatened – or to stop continuing – contamination to third party property. This argument is supported by case law in a number of jurisdictions.[15] Insurers, on the other hand, argue that the cleanup of soil contamination on the policyholder’s property is not covered under a general liability policy because the soil is “owned” by the policyholder – regardless of the fact that the soil contamination may adversely affect property that is not owned by the policyholder.

The relevant case in Oregon on this issue is Schnitzer Investment Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London.[16] In Schnitzer, the Oregon Supreme Court held that the “owned property” exclusion applied to bar coverage for the costs for soil remediation on a policyholder’s property because there was no showing that the policyholder was simultaneously being required to remediate damage to any groundwater or other non-owned property.[17] In so holding, the Court stated that, if damage to third party property had not already occurred, a showing of threatened damage to such property was insufficient to overcome the owned property exclusion hurdle.[18] Instead, actual damage being caused to third party property was required to invoke liability coverage for a policyholder’s cleanup of contaminated soil on property that it owned.

To address the foregoing dispute regarding the application of the “owned property” exclusion, the OECAA Amendment clarifies that, if part of the remediation costs incurred by the policyholder involves work that must be undertaken on the policyholder’s property to cut off the migration of contaminants to non-owned property, the owned property exclusion may not be construed to preclude coverage. Further, the policyholder need not show that actual damage to third party or public property had already taken place. Rather, the Amendment makes clear that, if soil contamination on owned property even “threatens to” damage third party property, coverage for the costs incurred to remediate such soil in that context will not be barred by the owned property exclusion. In this way, the OECCA Amendment overrides the part of the decision in Schnitzer providing that actual, rather than threatened, damage to non-owned property must be taking place for the exclusion to be inapplicable.

“All Sums” Coverage Responsibility
The OECAA Amendment clarifies the OECAA’s “all sums” rule of construction. Specifically, the statute provides that an insurer whose policy states that it has an obligation to pay “all sums” relating to a liability claim may not refuse to make payment to a policyholder on the grounds that another insurer also has coverage responsibility for that claim (the only exception to this rule is if the insurer’s policy is an excess policy that expressly provides that the insurer has no obligation to respond to a claim until the limits of the underlying policy have been paid). The OECAA Amendment provides further guidance on how a policyholder may enforce its “all sums” coverage rights through litigation in a situation where it sues less than all of the insurers that have overlapping coverage responsibility for the same loss.

Insurer vs. Insurer Contribution Claims
An issue that both policyholders and insurers had contended was impeding settlements of environmental coverage claims was the threat of contribution claims asserted by non-settling insurers against insurers that had entered into good-faith coverage settlements with the policyholder. To address this issue, the OECAA Amendment provides that:

  • An insurer that has paid all or part of an environmental claim may seek contribution from another insurer that: (i) is liable or potentially liable to the policyholder; and (ii) “has not entered into a good-faith settlement agreement with the insured regarding the environmental claim.” Thus, the Amendment prevents a non-settling insurer that must pay a judgment of coverage to a policyholder from pursuing a contribution claim against a settling insurer if the settling insurer had entered into a good-faith settlement with the policyholder.
  • There is a rebuttable presumption that binding settlement agreements between an insurer and a policyholder are made in good faith, and a settlement agreement approved by a court of competent jurisdiction after 30 days’ notice to the other insurers is deemed a good-faith settlement agreement with respect to all such insurers to whom such notice was provided.
  • The contribution rights set forth in OECAA preempt all common-law contribution rights.

Unfair Claims Practices
The OECAA Amendment defines a number of insurer claims-handling practices as “unfair settlement practices” that will subject insurers to liability. The new “unfair settlement practices” include the following:

  • Failing to comply with the “missing policy” requirements of Section 465.479;
  • Failing to commence investigation of an environmental claim within 15 working days after receipt of a notice;
  • Failing to make timely payments for defense or indemnity costs;
  • Denying a claim for an improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or to needlessly increase the cost of litigation;
  • Requiring that the policyholder provide answers to repetitive questions and requests for information concerning matters or issues unnecessary for resolution of the environmental claim; and
  • Failing to participate in good faith in a nonbinding environmental claim mediation requested by a policyholder concerning the existence, terms or conditions of a lost policy or regarding coverage for an environmental claim.

Under the Amendment, a policyholder aggrieved by any of these practices may give notice to the insurer and the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services of an intent to file a claim against the insurer. If the insurer fails to resolve the complaint within 20 days, the policyholder may file a claim against the insurer in a court of competent jurisdiction “to recover the actual damages sustained, together with the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs.” Additionally, in such an action, the court may, if it finds that the insurer acted “unreasonably,” award up to three times the actual damages.

Independent Counsel
Insurers accepting the defense of their policyholders often require the policyholder to retain counsel from a pre-approved list of law firms and attorneys, while at the same time reserving the right to deny coverage if the policyholder is found liable in the underlying proceeding. The OECAA Amendment requires that, if the insurer accepts the defense of the claim under a reservation of rights in this manner, or if the policyholder has potential liability for the environmental claim in excess of the limits of the general liability policy, the insurer must provide experienced, “independent counsel” to defend the policyholder, which shall represent only the policyholder and not the insurer. And, to the extent they are needed, the same rule applies to environmental consultants.

Proponents of the OECAA Amendment argued that this provision is intended to address the problem of insurance companies hiring “panel counsel” – which typically offer discounted billing rates to the insurer based on receiving a large volume of work – “without sufficient experience to defend insureds while at the same time reserving their right to deny coverage… if the inexperienced counsel or consultants they have hired are unsuccessful in defending the case.”[19]

Conclusion
The goal of the OECAA Amendment is to clarify the proper interpretation of policy language upon which insurers have based certain of their defenses to coverage for environmental claims arising in Oregon, and to encourage quicker and less expensive resolution of such claims. This Amendment may provide relief for those companies involved in the clean-up efforts at the Portland Harbor Superfund Site, and at sites elsewhere in Oregon, that have had to fight with their insurers to obtain insurance coverage for the costs of these efforts.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© K&L Gates LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

K&L Gates LLP
Contact
more
less

K&L Gates LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.