Orrick's Derivatives in Review - July 2014

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Extension of Certain Dodd-Frank No-Action Relief

The CFTC recently established a phased compliance timeline for the implementation of the execution requirement currently applicable to certain interest rate swaps and credit default swaps executed as part of a "package transaction."  It also recently issued a no-action letter further delaying an advisory regarding the applicability of certain Dodd-Frank requirements in connection with activities that occur in the United States.

Read more »

CFTC Establishes Expedited Process for Relief for Certain Delegating CPOs

On May 12, 2014, the CFTC issued guidance establishing the circumstances under which it intends to provide registration no-action relief through a streamlined process where a "commodity pool operator" has delegated investment management authority with respect to a commodity pool to another person registered as a CPO.  The CFTC included a form of request for no-action relief, which provides for certifications and acknowledgements to be made by both the delegating and designated CPOs regarding the criteria for relief. 

Read more »

Collateral Segregation Notices for Uncleared Swaps 

As required by a final rule issued by the CFTC last year, registered swap dealers have begun to notify counterparties prior to the execution of uncleared swaps that counterparties may require the segregation of any initial margin.

Read more »

NYS Bar Association Tax Session Issues Report on Section 871(m) Regulations

On May 20, 2014, the New York State Bar Association Tax Session issued a Report on Proposed Regulations under Section 871(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.  The report, which was co-authored by Orrick partner Peter J. Connors, addresses proposed regulations that the IRS issued in December 2013 concerning withholding on equity-linked financial instruments which reference U.S. stocks. 

Read more »

ISDA Publishes Section 2(a)(iii) Form of Amendment 

In June 2014, ISDA published a form of amendment relating to Section 2(a)(iii) of the preprinted form of ISDA Master Agreement.  Section 2(a)(iii) generally permits a contracting party to withhold performance indefinitely if an event of default or potential event of default has occurred and is continuing (or an early termination date has been designated) with respect to its counterparty. 

Read more »

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide