Orrick's Policy Observer - October 2012

by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

[authors: Celia M. Jackson and Richard DeNatale]

State of California v. Continental Insurance: Opinion Holds Insurers to Their Words

Commercial general liability, or CGL, policies typically run for one year and insure businesses against liability to third parties for property damage or bodily injury that occurs during that year. But complex litigation often results from injuries that are not confined to a single year. Lawsuits claiming exposure to asbestos or toxic chemicals, or property damage caused by pollution, typically allege damage that occurs progressively over many years or even decades. In such situations, does the policyholder get the benefit of all the insurance policies it purchased over the years, or is coverage limited to the insurance available for one particular year? 

Please click here to read the full article.
 

Sixth Circuit Finds Data Breach Coverage in Crime Policy

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held on August 23 that shoe retailer DSW Inc. was entitled to coverage under a computer fraud rider to its corporate crime policy for losses resulting when a hacker stole customer credit card and checking account information from the company’s main computer system. Retail Ventures, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA., No. 10-4567/4608 (6th Cir. Aug. 23, 2012). The hacker stole data concerning more than 1.4 million customers using the wireless network at one DSW store to download the information, and then used the data in a series of fraudulent transactions. DSW sought coverage for expenses it incurred for customer communications, public relations, customer claims and lawsuits, and attorney fees in state and federal investigations related to the hacking incident. Applying Ohio law, the court rejected the insurer’s claim that the policy was a fidelity bond covering only the insured’s own losses and not its liability for the losses of others, finding that the label given to the policy did not override the plain and ordinary meaning of the policy wording. The court rejected the insurer’s argument that the policy only covered “direct” losses, finding that the policy’s limitation of coverage to losses “resulting directly from” the theft of insured data did not unambiguously require the loss to result “solely” or “immediately” from the theft. The court also concluded that a trade secrets exclusion did not apply to the loss.

New Mexico Supreme Court Finds “Sudden and Accidental” Exception to Pollution Exclusion Allows Coverage of Gradual but Unexpected and Unintended Releases

In United Nuclear Corp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., Docket No. 32,939 (N.M. S. Ct., Aug. 23, 2012), New Mexico’s highest court concluded that the “sudden and accidental” exception to the qualified pollution exclusion provides coverage for “unexpected and unintended” releases of pollutants, and does not require that the releases be temporally abrupt. General and excess liability policies issued from the early 1970s through the mid-1980s usually contained this exclusion. The case involved alleged releases of contaminants at tailings impoundments at several uranium mines. Allstate asserted that coverage of the releases was excluded because they were not temporally abrupt. Reversing an intermediate appellate court decision, the court found the term “sudden” ambiguous, in that it could include either abrupt or unexpected releases. The court cited multiple dictionary definitions and the divergence of opinions among other courts as a basis for its opinion that the term was ambiguous. Then the court considered the drafting history of the exclusion as a basis for assessing insurance industry intent. The court concluded that “sudden” should be given the non-temporal interpretation favoring coverage.

Fifth Circuit Rules That Umbrella Insurer Suffered Prejudice by Late Notice When Jury Verdict Penetrated Its Coverage

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on August 2 shed new light on the application of the “notice prejudice” rule to excess insurers under Texas law. In Berkley Regional Ins. Co. v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co., No. 11-50595 (5th Cir. Aug. 2, 2012), the court ruled that a policyholder was not entitled to coverage from its umbrella insurer when it failed to provide notice of a claim until after a jury had entered a verdict exceeding the attachment point of the umbrella policy. When it was sued following a serious slip-and-fall incident, the policyholder tendered the claim to its primary carrier, which had issued a policy with limits of $1 million. The plaintiff’s expert estimated the damages at $1.25 million, and the defendant’s expert estimated the damages at $800,000. In mediation, the plaintiff initially offered to settle for $800,000, but the parties reached impasse in the settlement range of $150,000-$215,000. At trial, a jury awarded damages of $1,654,663.50 plus post-judgment interest and costs. Assessing Texas cases addressing the “notice prejudice” rule in the context of primary insurance, the court concluded that the umbrella insurer was prejudiced because it was not afforded an opportunity to “‘join in’ the investigation, to settle a case or claim, and to interpose and control the defense.” The court commented that, “[a]lthough we distill these principles from cases involving primary carriers, we discern no basis for a different rule for excess carriers.” While the court acknowledged that the position of an excess carrier is different from that of a primary insurer, it observed, “[O]nce the case is ‘over,’ notice is clearly too late.”

Indiana Appellate Court Finds Coverage for Pollution in Personal Liability Provision of CGL Policy

Reversing a trial court ruling, the Indiana Court of Appeals held on August 28 that a policyholder was entitled to pollution coverage under the “Personal and Advertising Liability” provision of a CGL policy issued by Cincinnati Insurance Company. FLM, LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., No. 49A02-0902-CV-127 (Aug. 28, 2012). Plaintiff FLM leased property to a recycling company for the handling and disposal of foundry waste from a Chrysler plant. After regulatory authorities cited FLM for violations related to the storage of the waste, FLM sought coverage under the CGL policy issued to the recycler. The court concluded that Cincinnati’s personal injury coverage, which extended to claims for “wrongful eviction from, wrongful entry into, or invasion of the right of private occupancy of a room, dwelling or premises” resulting from an “offense,” such as “wrongful entry” or “invasion of the right of private occupancy,” was broad enough to extend to third-party claims involving the dispersal of foundry waste from the FLM property.

Lumbermens Mutual, American Manufacturers Mutual, and American Motorists Insurance Company in Rehabilitation Proceedings

On August 16, an Illinois Circuit Court approved an Agreed Order of Rehabilitation for Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, and American Motorists Insurance Company (collectively, “AMICO”). In the Matter of the Rehabilitation of Lumbermens Mutual Cas. Co., et al., Mo. 12 CH 24227 (Ill Cr. Ct., Cook County, Aug. 16, 2012). The order vests title to all the assets and liabilities of AMICO in the Illinois Director of Insurance as statutory rehabilitator with authority to manage the AMICO estate. The court entered an injunction which, among other things, bars all claims and causes of action which have been or may be asserted against the company. Such claims or causes of action may be asserted against the AMICO estate only in the rehabilitation proceedings.

KWELM Scheme Prepares to Wrap Up

The administrator for the longstanding schemes of arrangement for the insolvent London Market "KWELM companies" (Kingscroft Insurance Company Limited, Walbrook Insurance Company Limited, El Paso Insurance Company Limited, Lime Street Insurance Company Limited, and Mutual Reinsurance Company Limited), is finally preparing to wrap up. Walbrook and El Paso previously paid all outstanding claims. On September 30, 2012, the remaining three KWELM companies declared their ultimate dividend percentages and sent final "top-up" payments for agreed claims to scheme creditors. The final declared claim percentages are as follows:

  • Kingscroft – a top-up of 2.41%, bringing total scheme dividends to 86.41% of agreed claims.
  • Lime Street – a top-up of 3.25%, bringing total scheme dividends to 90.25% of agreed claims.
  • Mutual Re – a top-up of 1.42%, bringing total scheme dividends to 76.42% of agreed claims.

These are the final scheme payments and it is anticipated that the scheme administrators will formally close the schemes in 2013.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.