Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Manufacturing Process & Personnel (Part 7)

Kidon IP

After deciding on the basic corporate or contractual structure, the company should decide how best to strategically divide the manufacturing process. In the outsourced manufacturing context, the best process involves not only efficient manufacture, but also the most effective process to mitigate potential trade secret risks.

To protect its assets, the company must first identify which IP has the greatest value and therefore needs the most structural and contractual protection. To be able to do this properly, the company must first conduct a well-thought-out IP audit, which we have discussed in separate articles. 

With respect to trade secrets, contractual protections are insufficient because of the inherent difficulties in enforcing breach of contract and trade secret misappropriation actions – especially in developing countries. Accordingly, practical and structural protection measures are also critical. These measures should be built directly into the outsourced manufacturing relationship. Where practical, the company should divide crucial know-how in a manner that prevents the manufacturer from having access to all of the trade secrets necessary to complete the manufacturing process.

Manufacturing Personnel: Limiting Access and Use

The strictest form of control over the company’s trade secrets and technological assets is to ensure that any manufacturer personnel do not access these assets, by either:

  • Having the company handle key aspects of the process or system internally at facilities outside of those of the manufacturer; or
  • Where internal treatment is not possible, having company personnel themselves work in the manufacturer’s facility.

If possible, it can be beneficial to allocate different phases of the process to different manufacturers. For example, in car manufacturing, a company may produce the engine or technology-intensive parts internally or through multiple service providers. The division of know-how between different entities can reduce the ability of, and potential harm caused by, a manufacturer that attempts to misappropriate valuable information.

Where the use of different manufacturers is not possible, the company may benefit from separating the process into different phases within a single manufacturer’s organization. The company can require that separate teams of employees and management personnel work on each phase, and that internal firewalls prevent the spread of information between the teams.

To the extent practicable, confidential information should be either or both:

  • Provided on a just-in-time and as-needed basis.
  • Expunged from the manufacturer’s systems immediately after use.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kidon IP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Kidon IP

Kidon IP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.