Patent Stakeholders Invited to Provide Public Comment on Patent Eligibility Impacts on American Innovation

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

On July 9, 2021, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a notice in the Federal Register on behalf of Senators Tillis, Hirono, Cotton, and Coons seeking public input for a patent eligibility study.1 The study focuses on the current state of patent eligibility case law in the United States, and how it affects investment and innovation in fields like quantum computing, artificial intelligence, precision medicine, diagnostic methods, and pharmaceutical treatments. Current law has made it difficult for patent innovations that can be characterized as abstract ideas or natural phenomena, which has made protection in fields like computer applications and medical diagnostics harder to obtain and defend.

The senators sent a letter to Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld, who is performing the functions and duties of the Director of the USPTO, asking that the USPTO publish a request for information. The USPTO, however, cannot do much with the submitted comments and information. Indeed, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has told the USPTO that it cannot bind anyone but itself.2 Instead, the senators appear to want the submitted comments as initial fact-finding to promote legislative solutions.

Subject matter eligibility is a particular issue for start-up companies and their surrounding ecosystems (like venture capitalists) and those in the software and diagnostic space. By submitting a comment, businesses affected by patent eligibility decisions may have a genuine opportunity to improve the very laws that affect them.

The notice poses 13 questions for public comment to prompt discussion on real-world impacts of patent eligibility case law. The questions are divided into two sections: 1) Observations and Experiences and 2) Impact on the General Marketplace. The focus is on the effect current law has on decisions that actual innovators and related businesses make regarding seeking and enforcing patents. To this end, the notice seeks specific examples of difficulties encountered in prosecuting patents, seeking investments, marketing innovations, and the like. The notice also seeks comparison with other leading innovation economies, such as Japan, China, Korea, and Europe. Because the senators represent a full spectrum of political views, this effort suggests the beginning of a serious bipartisan effort at reform.

All comments must be received by September 7, 2021, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at

Matthew Garnica and Richard Torczon contributed to the preparation of this alert.

[1] 86 Fed, Reg. 36257.

[2] cxLoyalty, Inc. v. Maritz Holdings Inc., 986 F.3d 1367, 1376 n.1 (Fed. Cir. 2021); In re Rudy, 956 F.3d 1379, 1382-83 (Fed. Cir. 2020).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.