PCAOB Announces First Settled Order with Admissions

by WilmerHale
Contact

Last week, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) joined the list of regulators who will, in certain circumstances, seek admissions of liability from audit firms and individuals in settlements. Although the conduct described in the first such settled order, In the Matter of David A. Aronson, CPA, P.A., and David A. Aronson, CPA1, was egregious in that it involved multiple failures across numerous engagements over a long period of time (some of which occurred after the respondents were put on notice of the violations during a Board inspection and, in one instance, even after the Division of Enforcement had opened its investigation), the new approach has much broader implications, particularly for larger firms and their professionals.

Summary of the Settled Order

In Aronson, the Board entered a settled disciplinary order against a firm and its sole owner based on their repeated violations of the independence rules and engagement quality review requirements.2 The Board found that Aronson and his firm had violated the independence rules by issuing audit reports related to public companies for five audit engagements in which Aronson’s son had acted in an accounting role during the periods under audit.3 Aronson was aware that the audit clients had hired a bookkeeping firm owned by his son because Aronson recommended his son’s firm for the work.4 The Board also found that the firm and Aronson failed to obtain an engagement quality review, as required under Auditing Standard No. 7 (AS 7), in ten separate audits.5 These violations continued even after the Board’s inspectors had brought them to Aronson’s attention and he had agreed with their conclusions that engagement quality reviews were required.6 For one of the cited audits, Aronson failed to obtain an engagement quality review despite the fact that the Division of Enforcement had notified him that it had opened an inquiry into the firm’s compliance with AS 7.7

Based on this slew of violations, the Board permanently revoked the Firm’s registration and barred Aronson from associating with a registered accounting firm.8

In all of its prior settled orders, the Board has included language noting that the settling parties neither admitted nor denied the Board’s findings. The Aronson settlement is different in that it includes a statement that the settling parties admitted to “the facts, findings, and violations set forth in the order.”9

Factors to Be Used in Seeking Settlements with Admissions

In prepared remarks given the same day that the Aronson order was announced, the PCAOB’s Director of Enforcement, Claudius B. Modesti, said that, going forward, the Division now will consider requiring admissions “in appropriate matters where heightened accountability and acceptance of responsibility are in the public interest.”10 He then provided a non-exhaustive set of factors that will inform the Division’s thinking on whether to recommend to the Board that it require the respondent to admit to the underlying facts or violations as part of any settlement.11 Those factors will include, but are not limited to, situations where the matter involves: 

  • egregious and intentional misconduct where the respondent knowingly and intentionally violated applicable laws, rules or standards;
  • misconduct that obstructs the Board’s processes, such as noncooperation with an inspection or investigation;
  • significant harm or risk of harm to investors or the securities markets;
  • situations where an admission can send a particularly important message to audit firms, their associated persons or the public; and
  • situations where the wrongdoer poses a particular future threat to investors (e.g., recidivists).12  

In announcing the order, Director Modesti said, “Obtaining admissions from auditors who engage in egregious misconduct enhances accountability and serves the interests of investors. Here, Aronson and his firm engaged in precisely that sort of misconduct, violating clear requirements and standards and continuing to do so even after repeated notice.”13 

Legal and Practical Implications of the New Policy

Most immediately, the new policy of seeking admissions may alter the calculus of those deciding whether to litigate or to settle disciplinary proceedings, particularly given the collateral consequences that may flow from any such admissions in parallel civil litigation or regulatory proceedings. Director Modesti acknowledged this possibility when he noted that the Division of Enforcement’s interest in avoiding “extended nonpublic disciplinary proceedings” will result in most of its settlements continuing to include language stating the respondent has neither admitted nor denied the Board’s findings.14

It remains to be seen how the Division and the Board will weigh these factors in specific cases, as they leave room for a significant amount of judgment in their application. Indeed, the factors are so broad that they provide little guidance at all concerning when the Board will seek admissions—a criticism that the SEC has faced in announcing the analogous factors that it considers in determining whether to seek admissions in a given case. Perhaps most concerning is the Board’s “send a message” factor. It may be that the Division and/or the Board will, in the future, determine that an admission from a larger firm or from one of its associated professionals would be more likely to “send a particularly important message to audit firms, their associated persons, or the public.”


1 PCAOB Rel. No. 105-2015-0234 (Oct. 2, 2015). 

2Id. at 1.

3Id. at p. 3

4Id. at p. 10.

5Id. at 3.

6Id. at 5, 7.

7Id. at 8.

8Id. at 1.

9Id.

10 Claudius B. Modesti, Director of Enforcement, "Modification to Settlement Recommendations for Disciplinary Proceedings,” Address Before the American Law Institute Accountants’ Liability 2015: Confronting Enforcement and Litigation Risks (Oct. 2, 2015).

11Id.

12Id.

13 Press Release, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, "PCAOB Imposes Sanctions Against Auditor who Admitted Violating Independence Requirements and PCAOB Standards" (Oct. 2, 2005).

14 Remarks by Director Modesti, supra note 13.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© WilmerHale | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

WilmerHale
Contact
more
less

WilmerHale on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.