What’s New, What It Means, and What to Do Now
Key Points
- 2026 playbook for advisers: Expect a back‑to‑basics push on fiduciary duty, compliance effectiveness, and operational resiliency, with sharper focus on retailization of complex/illiquid products, truthful AI governance and disclosures, and readiness for amended Regulation S‑P as deadlines hit.
- How exams will probe advice quality: Examiners will link recommendations to client goals, liquidity, costs and risk tolerance, heightened for leveraged, illiquid or fee‑intensive products, and press dual registrants on rollovers, account‑type rationales, best execution and compensation‑driven conflicts.
- De‑risk now to protect outcomes: Tighten conflict controls and documentation, fortify valuation and liquidity governance for alts, align AI “say–do” with human oversight, and operationalize amended Reg S‑P through incident response testing and vendor contract updates.
Why These Priorities Matter
If you work at or with an investment adviser, the SEC’s 2026 examination priorities are critical because they shape what examiners will scrutinize when assessing whether firms are acting in clients’ best interests, keeping data safe and running reliable operations. These priorities affect day-to-day tasks, from how recommendations are documented to how cyber incidents are handled, and they signal where the SEC expects stronger controls, clearer disclosures and better evidence of good decision-making. Understanding the 2026 focus areas will help investment professionals prepare records correctly, follow the right processes and support a successful examination experience.
What’s New and What’s Staying the Same
The SEC Division of Examinations is returning to the basics in 2026, while shifting attention in a few important areas. The core continuing themes are:
- Advisers’ fiduciary duties of care and loyalty.
- The effectiveness of compliance programs across marketing, valuation, trading, portfolio management, disclosures/filings, and custody.
- Information security and operational resiliency.
- Targeted exams of newly registered or never-examined advisers.
These standard principles show that the SEC still expects firms to prove their advice is aligned to client goals and that their compliance programs work in practice, not just on paper.
New or newly emphasized areas include:
- A closer look at the “retailization” of alternatives and complex, higher-cost products (e.g., private credit, illiquid‑asset ETFs), especially recommendations to older investors and retirement savers, where suitability, liquidity and costs are particularly sensitive.
- AI governance and disclosure, probing whether firms are transparent and accurate about how they use AI and whether people remain meaningfully involved in oversight.
- Readiness for the amended Regulation S-P, with examiners checking incident response, vendor oversight and breach notification practices as compliance dates take effect.
The SEC also notes potential reviews tied to activist-style reporting (like Schedules 13D/13G, Form 13F, Forms 3/4/5, and Form NPX) and warns about operational risks from mergers or consolidations among advisers.
Compared to 2025, some topics are de-emphasized. There is no standalone crypto section and no dedicated private fund adviser section, though private fund issues such as conflicts, liquidity, valuation and differential treatment remain embedded within fiduciary and disclosure testing. The amended Names Rule becomes an enforcement touchpoint as compliance deadlines arrive.
What Examiners Will Likely Test in Practice
Investment advisers should expect examiners to test whether advice truly matches the client’s objectives, liquidity needs, time horizon, costs and risk tolerance, with heightened scrutiny where products are illiquid, leveraged, volatile or fee intensive. Records should clearly show why a product or strategy is right for the client and how trade-offs were considered.
For dual registrants and advisers with affiliated broker-dealers, questions will likely probe account-type recommendations, rollover rationales, best execution and how conflicts, especially compensation-driven conflicts, are identified, mitigated and monitored. If your firm serves retail clients or retirement accounts, be ready to show that recommendations were based on the client’s circumstances and that conflicts did not influence outcomes.
If your firm is expanding into private funds or offering retail strategies that include assets that are less liquid, examiners may look closely at valuation, liquidity risk management, fair allocation, and fee and expense disclosures, including how side letters or special terms affect investors. Accurate and consistent disclosures, supported by real controls, will be critical.
Firms using AI for research, portfolio construction, client service or compliance should expect “say-do” testing. Examiners will compare public statements and client materials against what the firm does and then evaluate whether controls and human-in-the-loop oversight match the level of risk. This is about truthfulness and accountability as much as it is about technology.
On cybersecurity and privacy, the SEC plans to shift from checking whether a program exists to testing whether it works. That means reviewing incident response playbooks, third-party breach notification terms and records to see how the firm would detect, escalate, notify and recover from an event, particularly under the amended Regulation S-P.
Practical Steps to Prepare Now
Firms should start by refreshing their fiduciary framework, especially for any business lines that touch retail clients, so that records clearly document how cost, complexity, liquidity, volatility and exit costs were considered for each investment product. Hardwiring these factors into recommendation files, rollover documentation and best interest rationales will make it easier to show good decision-making during an exam.
For dual registrants: Tighten your account selection and allocation controls and make sure surveillance and exception reporting effectively address compensation-related conflicts. Build routines that flag outlier recommendations, unusual fee structures, or trading patterns that could indicate a conflict is affecting client outcomes.
For alternatives and private markets exposure: Strengthen your liquidity and valuation governance, test allocation and co-investment practices across related vehicles, and verify that disclosures about side letters and differential treatment are accurate and consistent with how the program operates.
For firms that use AI: Adopt policy guardrails, maintain model inventories and build risk assessments with human oversight checkpoints, monitoring and disclosure controls. The goal is a clear chain showing how models are selected, tested, governed and explained, so that what you say externally aligns with what you do internally.
For activist-style strategies: Reconcile your positions against Section 13 reporting calendars, automate triggers where possible and conduct a pre-exam filings audit to reduce the risk of misses or inconsistencies that could draw examiner attention.
Firms should also operationalize the amended Regulation S-P by completing tabletop incident response exercises, reviewing and fixing vendor contracts to ensure prompt breach notice and cooperation, and verifying training and recordkeeping so team members know their roles and evidence is retained properly.
Firms best positioned for the 2026 cycle will demonstrate disciplined basics: clear fiduciary decision-making supported by records, conflict controls that genuinely limit or neutralize incentives, credible cyber and privacy programs that meet amended Regulation S-P, and truthful AI disclosures backed by real governance. These fundamentals help examiners see that the firm’s culture and controls protect clients and manage risk.
Key Takeaways
Follow this practical path to readiness:
- Keep records complete and client-centric.
- Tie recommendations to goals, risk tolerance, liquidity needs and costs, especially for complex or illiquid products.
- Watch for conflicts, document rollover and account-type rationales clearly.
- Ensure disclosures match reality for fees, valuation, and allocation.
- Test incident response plans.
- Update vendor contracts for timely breach notice.
- Track AI usage with policies, inventories and human oversight.
Consistently following this basic guidance will help investment advisers meet the SEC’s 2026 expectations and be ready for a constructive examination.
[View source.]
