Price Gouging Weekly Round Up - June 2021

Proskauer Rose LLP

Price gouging enforcement and litigation is front and center for company counsel and business managers nationwide. Our weekly round up highlights some of the most relevant news and information for our clients and friends.

South Carolina Lifts Pricing Restrictions Related to Gasoline

On May 27, 2021, South Carolina Attorney General announced the expiration of the office’s notice of an “abnormal disruption of the market.” This notice, first issued May 11 in response to the ransomware attack on the Colonial Pipeline, triggered certain elements of South Carolina’s anti-price gouging statute. Violators of the price gouging statute could face a $1,000 fine and/or 30 days in jail. The Attorney General noted that “with Memorial Day coming up and the gas price increases we see every summer, people need to keep in mind that those increases are normal.”

Nevada Senate Advances Price Gouging Legislation

On Tuesday, May 25, 2021, the Nevada Senate passed legislation to include a price gouging provision in its Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Nevada does not currently have a state price gouging statute. The proposed legislation, already passed by the Nevada Assembly, would prohibit charging prices “grossly in excess” of the usual price for goods during a state of emergency. The penalties would include a $10,000 fine for each violation of the statute.

Vermont and South Carolina Extend COVID-19 Emergency Declarations

The Governors of South Carolina and Vermont have both extended the COVID-19 related states of emergency in their respective states. South Carolina Executive Order No. 2021-25 and Vermont Addendum 16 to Executive Order No. 01-20 have both extended the public health crisis through June 2021. While states are lifting mask mandates and loosening restrictions of public gatherings, South Carolina and Vermont are among the many states leaving states of emergency in effect, along the with the related pricing restrictions.

D.C. Attorney General Sues Amazon

On May 25, 2021, the Washington, D.C., Attorney General filed suit against Amazon for allegedly violating the D.C. Antitrust statute. The complaint alleges that Amazon’s terms and conditions for third-party sellers on its platform constitute an unlawful restraint of trade. Part of the allegations point to the higher prices charged to third-party sellers. According to the Attorney General, the fees paid to Amazon by third-party sellers have increased by 11% over the past five years, and now constitute approximately 45% of the price consumers pay on the platform.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Proskauer Rose LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.