Product Liability Update - April 2021

Foley Hoag LLP
Contact

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT -

• United States Supreme Court Holds Due Process Permits Exercise Of Specific Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-Of-State Vehicle Manufacturer For Product Liability Claims For Harm To Forum Residents From In-State Accidents Even Though Defendant Did Not Design, Manufacture Or Sell Vehicles At Issue There, As Defendant’s Current In-State Advertising, Sales And Servicing Of Same Vehicle Models Were Sufficiently “Related” Contacts To Support Jurisdiction

MASSACHUSETTS -

• Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Holds That In Most Negligence Cases, Including Those With Multiple Potential Causes, “But-For,” Not “Substantial Contributing Factor,” Is Correct Factual Causation Standard, But In “Rare” Cases Involving Two Independently Sufficient Causes Neither Is Exculpated And Each Is Factual Cause; “Substantial Factor” Language In Asbestos And Toxic Tort Cases Left Undisturbed But May Be Reexamined In Future...

Please see full Publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP
Contact
more
less

Foley Hoag LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.