Prognosticating Post Marks: Will Courts in Other Jurisdictions Follow in the 9th Circuit’s Footsteps on the Definition of an ATDS under the TCPA?

Womble Bond Dickinson
Contact

photo displays person holding ball with reflection of horizon

We clearly do not have a crystal ball here in TCPAland, otherwise we would have been able to accurately predict the Ninth Circuit’s monumental recent decision in Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLC, 2018 WL 4495553 (9th Cir. Sept. 20, 2018).  See our article on that here.

Which now leads us to this question(s): Will courts around the country follow Marks on the definition of an ATDS?  Especially knowing that the FCC’s TCPA Omnibus II will be unveiled very, very soon?  The following is our best attempts to predict what courts may now do on the ever-evolving issue of what the definition of an ATDS is, prior to the issuance of Omnibus II.

And in fair disclosure of our methodology, lest you think we just try to read tea leaves around here (as we are tea aficionados), we’ve made these predictions by trying to look at what some courts have done with their applications of ACA Int’l in light of the Hobbs Act (which essentially makes that ruling binding across the country), or if we weren’t able to find anything we looked at some pre-ACA Int’l TCPA decisions, and prior to the issuance of Omnibus II.

So here we go, in no particular order:

Let’s again start with the basics – the statutory definition of “ATDS:”

The TCPA defines the term “ATDS” as follows:

  • The term “automatic telephone dialing system” [“ATDS”] means equipment which has the capacity – (A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and (B) to dial such numbers. 47 USC § 227(a)(1).

DC Circuit Court of AppealsOur prediction:  Most likely to ignore Marks.

The case that started it all: ACA Int’l v. FCC, 885 F.3d 687 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 16, 2018).  As a refresher, ACA Int’l held that an “ATDS” is “equipment with the ‘capacity’ to perform each of two enumerated functions: (i) storing or producing telephone numbers ‘using a random or sequential number generator’ and (ii) dialing those numbers.”  Id. at 693.

The ACA Court found that the FCC’s 2015 Ruling that, “‘capacity’ of calling equipment ‘includes its potential functionalities’ or ‘future possibility,’ not just its ‘present ability’ was an impermissible expansive interpretation of “capacity” which had the apparent effect of “embracing any and all smartphones. . . . It is undisputed that essentially any smartphone, with the addition of software, can gain the statutorily enumerated features of an autodialer and thus function as an ATDS.”  Id. at 696.  The Court also reasoned that, “The TCPA cannot reasonably be read to render every smartphone an ATDS subject to the Act’s restrictions, such that every smartphone user violates federal law whenever she makes a call or sends a text message without advance consent.”  Id. at 697.

The ACA Court also found that it was improper for the FCC to espouse the competing interpretations about the “precise functions an autodialer must have the capacity to perform,” stating:  “So which is it:  does a device qualify as an ATDS only if it can generate random or sequential numbers to be dialed, or can it so qualify even if it lacks the capacity?  The 2015 ruling, while speaking to the question in several ways, gives no clear answer (and in fact seems to give both answers) . . . But the Commission cannot, consistent with reasoned decisionmaking, espouse both competing interpretations in the same order.”  Id. at 701, 702.

The ACA Court also set aside the Commission’s ruling that the “‘basic function’ of an autodialer is to dial numbers without human intervention, but a device might still qualify as an autodialer even if it cannot dial numbers without human intervention,” reasoning that those “side-by-side propositions are difficult to square.”

9th CircuitOur prediction:  Courts will likely follow Marks.

A recap of the 9th Circuit’s Marks decision:

Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLC, 2018 WL 4495553 (9th Cir. Sept. 20, 2018):  The 9th Circuit Court found that ACA Int’l v. FCC, 885 F.3d 687 (D.C. Cir. 2018) overturned the FCC’s prior predictive dialer rulings.  It also found that the statutory text was “ambiguous on its face,” and that it needed to look at the “context and the structure of the statutory scheme.”  Id. at *8.  It concluded that the statutory definition of ATDS is “not limited to devices with the capacity to call numbers produced by a ‘random or sequential number generator,’ but also includes devices with the capacity to dial stored numbers automatically.”  The Court then defined “ATDS” to mean:

“[E]quipment which has the capacity – (1) to store numbers to be called or (2) to produce numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator – and to dial such numbers automatically (even if the system must be turned on or triggered by a person).”

District courts in the 9th will likely follow Marks.  This is further evidenced by two district court cases that have held that ACA Int’l does not trump existing circuit court precedent.  See McMillion v. Rash Curtis & Assoc., 2018 WL 3023449 (N.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2018) (finding that ACA Int’l did not disturb prior Ninth Circuit rulings on predictive dialers); and Abante Rooter & Plumbing v. Alarm.com, 2018 WL 3707283 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2018) (finding that ACA Int’l only invalidated the 2015 FCC Order).

4th CircuitOur prediction:  Courts will likely ignore Marks.

In Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. v. PDR Network, LLC, et al., 883 F.3d 459 (4th Cir., Feb. 23, 2018), the appellate court held:  “When Chevron meets Hobbs, consideration of the merits must yield to jurisdictional constraints. [A]n Article III court’s obligation to ensure its jurisdiction to resolve a controversy precedes any analysis of the merits … [A]rguing that the district court can put off considering its jurisdiction until after step one of Chevron … turns that traditional approach on its head. [citations] Indeed, a district court simply cannot reach the Chevron question without ‘rubbing up against the Hobbs Act’s jurisdictional bar.’”

A future district court within the 4th Circuit will lack jurisdiction to even consider an argument contrary to the FCC’s new ATDS formulation.  Assuming the district courts take that mandate seriously, they should disregard Marks entirely in favor of the FCC’s new ruling, and wait for same.

3rd CircuitOur prediction:  Courts will likely ignore Marks.

In Fleming v. Associated Credit Servs., 2018 WL 4562460 (D. NJ. Sept. 21, 2018), the district court held, one day after Marks, that a predictive dialer is not an ATDS subject to the TCPA, and that the 2003 and 2008 Rulings were overruled by ACA Int’lId. at *9.

In Dominguez v. Yahoo, Inc., 894 F.3d 116 (3rd Cir. June 26, 2018), the Third Circuit held that sending text messages only to numbers that had been “individually and manually inputted into its system by a user” is not an ATDS unless it has the present ability to randomly or sequentially generate numbers and dial them.  The Court did not weigh in on the debate of whether the 2003 and 2008 predictive dialer rulings remain viable.  The Court did however, cite to ACA Int’l’s concern that “any ordinary smartphone could achieve autodialer functionality by simply downloading a random-number-generating app.”  Id. at 119.

But see Somogyi v. Freedom Mortg. Corp., 2018 WL 3656158 (D.N.J. Aug. 2, 2018), finding that predictive dialer rulings survived ACA Int’l and that dialing from a list is “random or sequential” dialing.

But see Sieleman v. Freedom Mortg. Corp., 2018 WL 3656159 (D.N.J. Aug. 2, 2018), finding that predictive dialer rulings survived ACA Int’l and dialing from a list is “random or sequential” dialing.

Given the recent Fleming decision, also out of New Jersey, and Dominguez, we predict that future courts within the Third Circuit will ignore Marks and follow Dominguez.  Additionally, the holding in Dominguez regarding sending text messages that had been individually and manually inputted by a user, appears to be at odds with Marks.

6th Circuit:  Our prediction:  Courts will likely ignore Marks.   

In Gary v. TrueBlue, Inc., 2018 WL 3647046 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 1, 2018), the court found that the 2003 and 2008 orders were overturned and that dialing from a list of numbers did not qualify as the use of an ATDS.  Gary is at odds with Marks.

In Keyes v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, 2018 WL 3914707 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 16, 2018), the court found that the 2003 and 2008 orders were overturned and the Aspect predictive dialing system was not an ATDS.

But see Sandusky Wellness Ctr., LLC v. Medco Health Sols., Inc. 788 F.3d 218 (6th Cir. 2015), tackling the meaning of the term “advertisement” under the TCPA, but declining to defer to the FCC’s 2006 ruling on the subject because it found the statutory definition unambiguous, without even mentioning the Hobbs Act’s jurisdictional bar.

Recent decisions appear to support that the rationale in Marks would not be followed within the 6th Circuit.

7th Circuit:  Our prediction:  Courts will likely ignore Marks.

In Pinkus v. Sirius XM Radio, (N.D. Ill. July 26, 2018), the district court held that the 2003 and 2008 orders were overturned and predictive dialers do not qualify as an ATDS even at the pleading stage.

Assuming the rationale of Pinkus is followed in the 7th Circuit, it is unlikely that courts there will use the new ATDS definition provided by Marks.

11th Circuit:  Our prediction:  Courts will likely ignore Marks, assuming “human intervention” rule is available

In Glasser v. Hilton Grand Vacations, 2018 WL 4565751 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 24, 2018), the district court found that ACA Int’l left intact the earlier FCC rulings that the basic function of an autodialer is to dial numbers without human intervention, but found that the “click to dial” dialer was not an ATDS.

In Maddox v. CBE Group, 2018 WL 2327037 (N.D. Ga. May 22, 2018), the district court found that the human intervention” test from the FCC’s predictive dialer rulings survived ACA Int’l, but found that the defendant’s clicker system was not an ATDS under this standard.

But see Heard v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, 2018 WL 4028116 (N.D. Ala. Aug. 23, 2018), finding that the Avaya predictive dialer met the statutory definition of an ATDS regardless of the FCC rulings.

Although the 11th Circuit has found that the FCC’s predictive dialer rulings survived ACA Int’l, they appear to differ from Marks in their reliance on the “human intervention” rule.

2nd Circuit:  Our prediction:  Courts will likely ignore Marks.    

In King v. Time Warner Cable, 894 F.3d 473 (2nd Cir. Jun. 29, 2018), the Second Circuit Court of Appeal held that the TCPA governs only calls made by devices with the current “capacity” to perform the functions of an ATDS.  The court did not identify just what those required functionalities actually are.  However, the court found that ACA Int’l overruled the FCC’s Omnibus ruling, and that it was binding on it and all other circuit courts of appeal under the Hobbs Act.  The King court also focused on ACA Int’l’s concern about extending the TCPA to “reach every smartphone that could be programmed to make automatic calls through a simple app download.”  Id. at 478.

The reasoning in King appears to be at odds with the reasoning in Marks.  As such, it is unlikely that courts in the Second Circuit will use the new ATDS definition provided by Marks.

5th Circuit:  Our prediction: Courts will likely ignore Marks

In Lester v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2018 WL 1220577 (W.D. La. Mar. 8, 2018), the district court granted Wells Fargo’s summary judgment motion.  With regard to the TCPA claim, the court held that the plaintiff’s claim was barred because she did not opt out of a prior class action settlement, and that she also expressly consented to the calls.

In Reese v. Anthem, Inc., 2018 Wl 1251658 (E.D. La. Mar. 12, 2018), the district court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss in a putative class action on the basis that the plaintiff consented to receiving the text messages at issue.

In Dwyer v. USAA Savings Bank, 2017 WL 7805760 (W.D. Tx. Nov. 21, 2017), the district court stayed the matter pending the decision in ACA Int’l, given that the defendant denied using an ATDS.

Nothing in the aforementioned cases (and other cases reviewed but not listed) suggest that courts within the Fifth Circuit would follow Mark’s definition of an ATDS.

8th Circuit:   Our prediction:  Courts will likely ignore Marks

In Garcia v. Target Corp., 276 F.Supp.3d 921 (D. Mn. Nov. 3, 2016), the district court stayed the case pending the decision in ACA Int’l.

But see Gould v. Farmers Insur. Exchange, 2018 WL 3729294 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 6, 2018), where the district court denied a stay of the action.  However, the district found that ACA Int’l struck down the FCC’s most recent ATDS rulemaking because it “espoused competing interpretations concerning whether the lack of human intervention is a necessary aspect of any ATDS, among other issues.”

Given the acknowledgement of ACA Int’l at least by one district court, it appears that courts within the 8th Circuit would not follow the rationale in Marks.

10th Circuit:  Our prediction:  Courts will likely follow Marks

In Lavigne v. First Community Bancshares, Inc., 2018 WL 2694457 (D. Nm. June 5, 2018), the district court granted plaintiff’s motion to certify a class on a TCPA claim.  In its opinion, the court cited a number of California district court decisions.

Given the geographical proximity of the 9th and 10th circuits, it appears likely that the district courts in within the 10th circuit would be willing to follow the rationale in Marks.

1st Circuit:  Our prediction:  Courts will likely ignore Marks

In Ready v. Synchrony Bank, 2018 WL 1701355 (D. Me. April 6, 2018), the district court denied a motion to dismiss and found that there were sufficient enough allegations to state a claim.  In also finding standing to sue, the court stated that it would “adopt the better-reasoned majority approach” that concluded that the “invasion of privacy, annoyance and wasted time associated with robocalls is sufficient to demonstrate concrete injury.”  The court also cited ACA Int’l for the definition of an ATDS.

It appears that courts in the 1st Circuit would try to follow a “majority approach,” and perhaps stay and wait for the FCC’s Omnibus II ruling, or follow the rationale in King or Dominguez.

Photo Credit: Sindre Strøm on Pexels.com.

[View source.]

Written by:

Womble Bond Dickinson
Contact
more
less

Womble Bond Dickinson on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.