Proposed Federal Clean Water Rule Impacts Cities and Residents - Comments Being Sought

Best Best & Krieger LLP

For the second time in the last 4 years, and the seventh since the Clean Water Act was adopted in 1972, the federal government has revised the definition of the term “Waters of the United States” for the purposes of the federal Clean Water Act. The Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers released a proposed rule Tuesday with the new definition. Like each iteration before it, this one will have broad implications for public agencies and private property owners.
 
If adopted, the rule will repeal and replace the 2015 rule issued at the end of the Obama administration. Meanwhile, the status of the 2015 rule remains in flux. Because of various challenges (including a trip to the U.S. Supreme Court), the 2015 rule applies in California and 21 other states. In 28 other states, the 2015 rule is put on hold and the EPA’s 2008 Guidance and earlier decisions apply. The highlights of this week’s proposed rule are:

  • “Adjacent wetlands” and similar waters would only be included in CWA jurisdiction if they “are physically and meaningfully connected to other jurisdictional waters.”
  • “Ephemeral streams and related features” would be excluded from CWA jurisdiction.
  • Man-made infrastructure (including water supply and flood control conveyances and storage facilities) remains within the definition of WOTUS, if it was originally constructed on a water body that would otherwise qualify as jurisdictional – but, because of other changes in the proposed rule, the scope of what would qualify is much more limited.
  • The agencies are seeking comment on how the proposed rule will regulate impoundments, storm drains and other man-made infrastructure. The rule and the preamble make clear that the agencies are actively seeking input from people and entities who will be impacted by these aspects of the proposed rule.

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking provides a 60-day comment period that will end in February, and will include one public meeting in Kansas City on Jan. 23.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Best Best & Krieger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
Contact
more
less

Best Best & Krieger LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide