Proposed House Tax Plan, Now Being Updated by the Senate, Is in Flux: Year-End Update

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Despite Senator Joe Manchin’s (D-West Virginia) recent announcement that he would not support a comprehensive version of Build Back Better, we expect Congress will advance some parts of the legislation early in 2022.

TAKEAWAYS

  • The revised tax plan passed by the House of Representatives, recently proposed to be adjusted by the Senate Finance Committee, dialed back several proposed tax law changes that would have significantly impacted available estate planning opportunities.
  • Clients should consider the updated proposals’ impact on estate and wealth planning for 2022 and weigh possible action now while favorable tax law is in place.

As 2021 comes to a close, it is worth taking note of the current state of proposed legislation that could affect estate planning opportunities in the coming year. Some of the House Ways and Means Committee tax plan proposed in September 2021 (the House Proposal) is no longer on the legislative table; however, certain proposals should be carefully monitored as they could impact your estate and wealth planning for 2022. Below is an update on the proposed laws contained in the House Proposal and a summary of the current proposals in the Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376), as recently sought to be adjusted by the Senate Finance Committee. With Senator Manchin’s announcement that he cannot support the Build Back Better Act, no passage of a comprehensive bill is expected this year. However, Congress may take action on certain components of the proposed legislation early in 2022.

  1. Reduction in the Unified Credit. The unified credit against estate and gift taxes was proposed to revert to its 2010 level of $5 million per individual, indexed for inflation. Under the Build Back Better Act, no reduction in the unified credit is proposed. Thus, the unified credit remains at an all-time high of $11.7 million for each individual citizen or resident of the U.S.
  2. New Grantor Trust Rules.
    The House had proposed significant changes for grantor trusts under the House Proposal. It was proposed that Grantor trusts created on or after the date of enactment of the new law are includable in the Grantor’s taxable estate and sales between a grantor trust and the Grantor (or the deemed owner) would be treated the same as sales between the Grantor and a third party. The Build Back Better Act does not currently provide for any changes to grantor trust treatment. Thus, the valuable grantor trust planning opportunity remains an important estate planning option at present.
  3. Limiting Valuation Discounts. The House Proposal provided that “nonbusiness assets” would not receive valuation discounts for transfer tax purposes. The Build Back Better Act does not provide for any changes in valuation discounts. Thus, the use of intra-family valuation discounts remains a valuable estate planning opportunity.
  4. QSBS Limitation for Certain High-Income Individuals. The House Proposal and the Build Back Better Act both proposed that the 75 percent and 100 percent exclusion rates for gains realized from qualified small-business stock (QSBS) if taxpayer’s income exceeds $400,000 would be eliminated. The 50 percent exclusion would still apply.
  5. Graduated Corporate Rate Structure; Rate Increases. The House proposed introduction of a graduated corporate rate structure:
    a. 18 percent on the first $400,000 of income;
    b. 21 percent on income $400,001 to $5 million;
    c. 26.5 percent on income thereafter.
    The Build Back Better Act did not provide for this graduated corporate rate structure.
  6. Individual Income Tax Rate Increase. The House Proposal would have increased the top marginal individual income tax rate to 39.6 percent. The Build Back Better Act did not propose changes to the individual income tax rates, but see the surcharge discussion below.
  7. Increase in Capital Gains Rate for Certain High-Income Individuals. The House Proposal would have increased the top capital gains rate to 25 percent (current rate is 20 percent). The Build Back Better Act did not propose an increase in the capital gains rate.
  8. Surcharge on High-Income Taxpayers. Under the House Proposal, a 3 percent tax would have been imposed on individual income over $5 million. The Build Back Better Act proposed to impose a 5 percent surcharge on individual income over $10 million and an additional 3 percent on such income over $25 million. For trusts, these income thresholds were significantly lower—the 5 percent surcharge would apply to trusts with income over $200,000, and an additional 3 percent surcharge on income exceeding $500,000.

The Build Back Better Act

In addition to the items noted above, the Build Back Better Act had other provisions of note for individuals in 2022.

  1. Increase SALT Deduction Cap. The limitation on the deduction for state and local taxes was proposed to be increased from $10,000 to $80,000. However, the Senate Finance Committee proposed to limit this amount of increased deduction.
  2. Retirement Accounts. The Build Back Better Act proposed to prohibit new contributions to a Roth or traditional IRA if the total value of such account exceeds $10 million as of the end of the prior tax year. This prohibition would apply to taxpayers with income over $400,000 for single and married filing separately or $450,000 for married joint filers. The Build Back Better Act also proposed minimum distribution rules for IRAs and defined contribution retirement accounts over $10 million. 50 percent of the amount by which the taxpayer’s prior year account’s total value exceeded $10 million would be required to be made in the current year as a minimum distribution.

Planning Opportunities

The Build Back Better Act preserved grantor trusts, the existing estate tax exemption amounts and the intra-family valuation discount opportunity. Moreover, the powerful long-term (unlimited potential duration) and large amount—also $11.7 million per individual—GST exemption remains in place, thus preserving the very important opportunity to establish a long-term GST trust in a state that allows long-term trusts, such as Wyoming, Delaware and certain other states.

Clients who are considering gifts to irrevocable trusts should do so now while the law allows for grantor trusts, and while the exemption amounts remain high. Clients with existing non-grantor trusts should consult with their estate planning attorneys regarding the proposed surtax, and ways to reduce the potential higher income tax burden. Options may include making distributions to beneficiaries in already-high tax years, and allocation of capital gains from trust principal to income, if the trust permits.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Contact
more
less

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide