Public Officials and Courts Acknowledge COVID-19 Risks for Incarcerated Individuals; Prisoners Seek Bail, Compassionate Release, Medical Furloughs, and Early Parole

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP
Contact

The density of prison environments, lack of access to adequate healthcare, and other considerations are placing prisoners at particularly high risk for contracting and spreading the COVID-19 virus.

On March 22, 2020, New Jersey became the first state to temporarily suspend and commute county jail sentences in response to the pandemic under an order issued by the New Jersey Supreme Court with the support of the New Jersey Attorney General, the County Prosecutors Association of New Jersey and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

In a follow-up measure, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed Executive Order 124 on April 10, 2020, creating a process for the New Jersey Department of Corrections to grant temporary reprieve to certain at-risk inmates during the COVID-19 crisis. With that action, New Jersey joined the federal government and other states in releasing certain state prison inmates in order to curtail the spread of the virus.

In an opinion issued on Easter Sunday, Judge Madeline Cox Arleo, District Judge for the District of New Jersey, called Hudson County “the epicenter of the virus in New Jersey” and took issue with the conditions at the Hudson County Correctional Center (HCCC). Relying on the Declaration of the Director of HCCC, Judge Arleo found that the numbers of those infected at the Hudson County facility are grim and ordered the release of four ICE detainees.

Similarly, Judge Alison Nathan, District Judge for the Southern District of New York, recently granted an emergent bail motion finding, in part, that “inmates may be at a heightened risk of contracting COVID-19 should an outbreak develop.”

In another matter, Judge John Michael Vasquez, District Judge for the District of New Jersey, found that the conditions of confinement at Essex County Correctional Facility – including the volume of ICE detainees confined to inherently limited living and sleeping quarters, limited access to hygiene products, shared bathroom facilities, and the transmission of COVID-19 to detainees in custody – amounted to punishment of the petitioners, who had underlying medical conditions that made them vulnerable to serious complications or death if they contract the virus.

Despite these measures, there continues to be an unprecedented number of illnesses and deaths unfolding in federal, state and county jails across the country as a consequence of the pandemic. This has led many non-violent and low-level offenders who are currently incarcerated – and are at an increased risk of contracting COVID-19 – to file requests for bail, compassionate release, medical furloughs, or early parole at both the state and federal level.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP
Contact
more
less

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.