Real-Life Political Drama Provides More Questions Than Answers: BB&K's Parissh Knox Examines the Issues Raised in the Palmdale Election Case

by Best Best & Krieger LLP

Editors note: This article was written prior to the Oct. 16, 2013 ruling by the 2nd District Court of Appeal that lifted the injunction barring the Nov. 5, 2013 election.

Palmdale, a suburb nestled in the Mojave Desert north of Los Angeles, is among a growing number of cities, community college districts, school districts and other agencies in California that are under tremendous pressure to change how their governing bodies are elected because of the California Voting Rights Act or CVRA. In July, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled that the City of Palmdale’s “at-large” election system diluted the chances of minority voters to elect their preferred candidates. The city must now change to a “by district” election system. However, the court has not yet determined how the proposed district lines should be fashioned.

While Palmdale officials have yet to decide whether to appeal the July decision, they are now grappling with a preliminary injunction issued last month halting the upcoming November 5 election to fill two open seats on the Palmdale City Council. Despite this July decision, the city scheduled this November election as an at-large election in part because the proposed remedial measures would not be finalized before the ballots were mailed out. This preliminary injunction suggests that courts can put all current election cycles on hold until the court completes its remedial process.

The Palmdale Irony

Why, perhaps, did the plaintiffs bring this injunction? The plaintiffs’ initial complaint alleges that the “current absence of any Latinos or African Americans on the Palmdale City Council reveals a lack of access to the political process.” Plaintiffs’ core argument is that the upcoming election, regardless of the current slate of candidates, is only temporary relief and not a permanent one.

The irony behind this injunction is that three of the four city council candidates who had qualified to appear on next month’s ballot were actually minority candidates: two black candidates, one Latino candidate and one white incumbent. At least one open seat, if not both, would have been filled by new minority city council members. Meanwhile, Palmdale has appealed this preliminary injunction because the cancellation of a regularly scheduled city council election is fairly unprecedented and could, according to the city, create an immediate harm to the rights of voters.

The CVRA applies equally to both general law cities and charter cities as the dilution of minority voting rights is considered a matter of statewide concern. City councils and governing boards commonly use one of three variations of electing their members: (1) at-large elections; (2) by district elections; or (3) some type of mixed system. At-large election systems are those in which each member of the governing board is elected by all voters across the entire jurisdiction. Meanwhile, officials elected by district are elected only by voters in a particular geographical section of the jurisdiction. Meanwhile, mixed systems combine these features by having some members of the board elected at-large, others elected by district.

Following adoption of the CVRA in 2002, it has become significantly easier for plaintiffs to prove voting discrimination using a relatively lower burden of proof than what is comparatively required under federal law. The CVRA does not require proof of discriminatory intent by voters or elected officials in order to establish a violation. In California, a violation of the CVRA can be proven solely based on evidence of “racially polarized voting.” The following factors are probative, but not necessary, in order to establish racially polarized voting:

  • a history of discrimination;
  • the use of electoral devices or other practices or procedures that may enhance the dilutive effects of at-large elections;
  • denial of access to those processes determining which groups of candidates will receive financial or other support in a given election;
  • the extent to which members of a protected class bear the effects of past discrimination in areas such as education, employment and health, which hinder their ability to participate effectively in the political process; and
  • the use of overt or subtle racial appeals in political campaigns.

Plaintiffs wishing to bring a claim only need to focus on actual voting patterns. No smoking gun of bigotry or geographic concentration of minority voters is required. In the Palmdale lawsuit, plaintiffs made their case of racially polarized voting by producing a regression analysis of all city council and mayoral election results since 2000. During this period, only one Latino candidate and no African-American candidates were elected under Palmdale’s at-large method of election. According to plaintiffs’ complaint, no Latino candidate or African-American candidate has been elected mayor since the city’s incorporation in 1962. As of the 2010 Census, Palmdale’s Latino population of any race was approximately 54.4 percent Latino and 14.8 percent African-American. According to the plaintiffs, both these populations are actually geographically concentrated within the city.

Jurisdictions, like Palmdale, that have diverse populations with few minority elected officials are at the most risk of challenge. Each jurisdiction still using this type of system is encouraged to review its own election history and seek the advice of its general counsel. Under existing law, it should be noted that courts are not required to consider the following:

  • Patterns of voter turnout;
  • Proof of intent to discriminate;
  • Qualifications of individual candidates;
  • Effectiveness of past campaigns for elected office;
  • Candidate’s ability to raise campaign funds; and/or
  • Candidate’s ability to run strong campaigns.

A Number of Unanswered Questions

The more you look behind the curtain, the more interesting the story gets. One of the two attorneys filing the injunction is the mayor of the neighboring city of Lancaster, making this a real-life political drama. Stay tuned … this will only get better as a number of legal and practical questions have been raised, including:

  • Who is responsible for the costs incurred by each of the candidates?
  • Will the county still bill the city for its canceled election?
  • What is to be done with any mail-in ballots already submitted?
  • How much is this going to cost Palmdale when it is all said and done?
  • What is the actual history of Palmdale’s registered voter population?
  • Does the state Legislature need to consider amending this legislation?
  • In the future how would the appellate court rule if two minority candidates were subsequently elected to a governing board before the transition to a by district election system took place?
  • What effect will this decision have on other courts in similar situations—will we see more canceled elections?

At this story continues, some of these questions will be hopefully answered as the litigation in this case proceeds, and their answers will inform other CVRA cases as well as agencies wrestling with the decision of whether they need to change to a by-district election as a preventative measure. The real victor in all of this may be those who recently filed suits or who are considering doing so soon.

* This article was originally published in on Oct. 17, 2013. Republished with permission.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Best Best & Krieger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Best Best & Krieger LLP

Best Best & Krieger LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.