Recent Appellate Court Decision Reminder Of Student Records Protections In Adversarial Proceedings

by Franczek Radelet P.C.

In a recent decision, the Illinois Appellate Court held that it is not an unfair labor practice for a school district to refuse to release school student records to a union in a grievance proceeding without a court order or consent of the students’ parents. The reasoning of the case can be applied to other types of adversarial proceedings to which school districts and other educational institutions may be parties. The case is an important reminder of the rights and responsibilities of K-12 educational institutions to protect the records of their students. 

Board of Education of Chicago v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board arose from the dismissal by the Board of Education for the City of Chicago of a school security officer for initiating physical altercations with two students. The employee’s union sought disciplinary records for the two students to use to defend the employee in a grievance proceeding initiated by the union. The union agreed that the students’ names could be redacted from the records and that the records would remain confidential pursuant to a collective bargaining confidentiality provision. The Board nonetheless refused to release the records, citing the Illinois School Student Records Act, even when served a subpoena from the arbitrator in the case. The union filed an unfair labor practice charge against the Board. The union alleged that the refusal to release the records violated the Board’s duty to produce records to the union in a grievance proceeding. The IELRB agreed with the union, and the Board appealed through administrative review to the Appellate Court. The Appellate Court reversed the IELRB’s decision, holding that student disciplinary records are protected from disclosure under the Student Records Act in grievances before the IELRB, even if the records are relevant to the proceeding, unless the union obtains a court order requiring their release. 
As an initial matter, the Court found that the records would be “school student records” protected by the Student Records Act even if the student names were redacted. The Court explained that because the records of only two students were sought, the records were sought for the express purpose of discovering their individual disciplinary histories, and the records would only be useful if they were linked to the specific students, merely redacting the students’ names would not protect their identities. 
The Court then rejected the argument that school student records can be released in an IELRB proceeding despite the Student Records Act. The Court noted that there was no conflict between the Student Records Act and the Labor Relations Act requirement that records be released to the union, because the union can seek a court order to obtain student records under the Student Records Act. Then, the Court rejected the argument that a provision of the Student Records Act allowing release of student records “[t]o any person as specifically required by State or federal law” permitted release of the records under the Labor Relations Act. The Court found that the Labor Relations Act does not expressly order the disclosure of student records as would be required for the Student Records Act exception to apply. The Court also held that it was not sufficient that the union agreed to hold the documents in confidence, because parents have rights under the Student Records Act that cannot be abrogated by an agreement between the Board and the union. Finally, the Court held that a subpoena issued by an arbitrator is not a “court order” for purposes of the Student Records Act, because the Labor Relations Act provides for enforcement of a subpoena in a court of law. In concluding, the Court noted that although it was mindful that in some rare cases delays might be caused by the need to enforce a subpoena for student records in court, that would be the exception, not the rule, and most enforcement actions may be resolved expeditiously.
The Court’s decision effectively divests the IELRB of any jurisdiction to compel or even authorize the release of school student records in labor arbitrations. With respect to other types of records, the Board may compel release of the records after balancing confidentiality interests. Nonetheless, with respect to student records courts commonly issue orders allowing release of such records in administrative proceedings. There is no reason to believe that relevant student records will not become part of the records in labor arbitrations, although unions, employers, and in some cases the school district itself will have an additional step of either obtaining parental consent or a court order if they wish to use student records in a labor arbitration.  The Court’s reasoning also can be applied to many other types of adversarial proceedings to which school districts and similar educational entities may be parties. For example, student records requests are becoming more and more common in tenured teacher dismissal hearings and student disciplinary matters. This decision suggests that in those cases, too, either parental consent or a court order will need to be obtained before student records can be released or used by a party in the proceedings. The case is an important reminder that the Student Records Act provides strong protections for school student records—so strong that, without a court order or parental consent, they will not be overcome by the rights of the opposing parties in adversarial proceedings.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Franczek Radelet P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Franczek Radelet P.C.

Franczek Radelet P.C. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.