Recent EEOC Guidance Calls for Reasonable Accommodation of Normal Pregnancy

by Faegre Baker Daniels

In July 2014, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) took the position, in controversial Enforcement Guidance, that the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) requires employers to treat women with normal pregnancies and lactating women the same as other employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work. The guidance effectively requires employers to provide reasonable accommodation for normal pregnancy and lactation to employees who are not "disabled" as defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). So, for example, if an employer provides disabled employees accommodations such as more frequent breaks, adjusted work schedules, time off work, or light duty based on their medical conditions, the EEOC's stance is that women with normal pregnancies or who are lactating are entitled to similar accommodations as needed. 

The EEOC previously announced that it would be focusing on the issue of accommodation of pregnancy-related limitations under the American with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA) and the PDA, and it has been active in enforcing the PDA. Several recent consent decrees settling pregnancy discrimination charges require the employers to make settlement payments to affected employees, post notices of rights, conduct employee trainings, and issue new or revised employee policies.

Meanwhile, however, the Supreme Court is reviewing Young v. United Parcel Service, a case brought by a woman who was allowed to take leave but denied a light-duty assignment during her pregnancy. The employer provided light-duty opportunities for individuals with disabilities under the ADA, but did not do so for women with normal pregnancies or other non-disabled employees with work restrictions. The employee argued that the PDA entitles pregnant women to any benefits provided to non-pregnant workers who have similar work limitations. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected that argument, holding that because the employer's light-duty policy was pregnancy-neutral, it was lawful. If the Supreme Court affirms the Fourth Circuit holding, the decision would overrule much of the new Enforcement Guidance (which, in any event, does not have the force of law, although courts often defer to such guidance in determining how to apply the law).

The EEOC has drawn fire for not providing an opportunity for public comment before issuing the guidance, which passed by a 3-2 vote of the commissioners, divided on party lines. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (S. 942/H.R. 1975), now pending in Congress, would give the EEOC position the force of law by amending the PDA to require employers to reasonably accommodate known work limitations relating to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions of job applicants or employees. Passage appears unlikely at this time, however, and some commentators have criticized the guidance as overreaching, with one of the commissioners who voted against the guidance criticizing it as "legislating — a task far beyond our purview." 

Further complicating the compliance challenge that employers face is a growing list of state and local pregnancy accommodation laws. California, Minnesota, New Jersey and several other states have such laws in effect; Illinois has passed a statute that will become effective January 1, 2015; and even some cities such as New York City have enacted such legislation. 

Although the Supreme Court's decision in Young v. United Parcel Service could negate significant portions of the guidance, the guidance also speaks to issues not raised in that case. It discusses contraceptive usage and concludes that, because contraception is a means by which a woman can control her capacity to become pregnant, Title VII necessarily prohibits discrimination related to contraception usage. Additionally, an employer can violate Title VII by providing health insurance excluding coverage of prescription contraceptives; in order to comply with Title VII, an employer's health insurance plan must cover prescription contraceptives "on the same basis as prescription drugs, devices and services that are used to prevent the occurrence of medical conditions other than pregnancy." 

In a footnote, the commission acknowledges the Supreme Court's June 30 decision of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., et al., No. 13-354, which held that, under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, closely held for-profit corporations cannot be required by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide group health plan coverage of certain kinds of contraceptives the owners find religiously objectionable. The commission declined to address whether certain employers may also be exempt from this particular Title VII requirement under the First Amendment or the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, leaving uncertainty as to the application of Title VII in a situation similar to that presented in Hobby Lobby.

The guidance also addresses when and how pregnancy-related medical conditions may constitute disabilities under the ADA. A pregnant employee may be entitled to a reasonable accommodation under the ADA for limitations resulting from pregnancy-related conditions that constitute a disability or for limitations resulting from the interaction of the pregnancy with an underlying impairment. The commission provides examples of pregnancy-related limitations, including anemia, sciatica, carpal tunnel syndrome, gestational diabetes, swelling and depression. 

The guidance concludes with "best practices" for employers to reduce their chances of pregnancy-related PDA violations and ADA violations, and to remove barriers to equal opportunity. The commission divided its suggestions into five subcategories: (1) general; (2) hiring, promotion and other employment decisions; (3) leave and other fringe benefits; (4) terms and conditions of employment; and (5) reasonable accommodation. For example, the guidance recommends that employers "State explicitly in any written reasonable accommodation policy that reasonable accommodations may be available to individuals with temporary impairments, including impairments related to pregnancy."

Employers should review their policies and practices to ensure they are compliant with all applicable laws (including Title VII, the PDA, the ADA, the FMLA, and state and local laws), taking this new guidance into account. If any policies or practices conflict with existing law or the new guidance, consult legal counsel to evaluate the appropriate course of action.

Written by:

Faegre Baker Daniels

Faegre Baker Daniels on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.