Recent Federal Court Rulings Reaffirm Broad Supersession of Common Law Claims under California's Uniform Trade Secrets Act

by Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Last month, two federal district courts reaffirmed that litigants may not plead around California's Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) by alleging common law tort claims said to protect business information that does not otherwise qualify for trade secret protection.

These rulings are important because some federal courts in California previously had issued inconsistent rulings on this question in the wake of two earlier California appellate rulings favoring broad UTSA preemption (or "supersession") of alternative common law claims. These recent decisions affirm California's broad preemption of alternative tort claims under the UTSA so that litigants may not pursue intellectual-property-like tort claims based on unprotectable information.

In XpertUniverse v. Cisco Systems, Inc., a court in the District of Delaware granted the defendant's motions for partial summary judgment regarding several issues, including whether the UTSA superseded several of the plaintiff's claims.1 The court, applying California law, rejected the plaintiff's argument that its breach of confidence claim was not preempted under the UTSA where it was "expressly based on the theft of non-trade secret, but otherwise protectable, confidential and proprietary information." The court noted that the "prime purpose" of the UTSA was to establish a "uniform set of principles" for determining when one is or is not liable for the acquisition, disclosure, or use of "information ... of value" as found in the UTSA's definition of a "trade secret." To permit otherwise would create "a new category of intellectual property beyond the contemplation of the Act."

Similarly, in RSPE Audio Solutions, Inc. v. Vintage King Audio, Inc., a court in the Central District of California reached the same conclusion on a motion to dismiss, noting that "[e]ven proprietary information that does not constitute a trade secret may fall within [the] CUTSA's ambit where the basis of the property interest is rooted in the information's private nature."2 The court noted that a determination of a UTSA supersession claim may be possible on a motion to dismiss "where a plaintiff includes only vague allegations regarding the nature of purportedly non-trade secret proprietary information."3 Both XpertUniverse and RSPE Audio Solutions thereby make clear that the UTSA preempts tort claims premised upon information claimed to be "confidential," whether or not such information is truly a trade secret.

In a similar case in December 2012, Sunpower Corp. v. SolarCity Corp., a federal judge in the Northern District of California ruled in favor of the defendants—represented in part by Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati—that claims styled as misappropriation of "non-trade secret proprietary information" are superseded by the UTSA, and granted a motion to dismiss.

These cases are consistent with a national trend. A strong majority of courts in jurisdictions with typical UTSA preemption statutes have ruled in favor of broad supersession. The result is that a litigant bringing claims over the alleged misuse of confidential business information is permitted to bring claims for breach of a confidentiality contract and a UTSA violation, but cannot allege other claims based on the same fact allegations, even if labeled "confidential but not secret."

The UTSA preemption question is important because it affects the scope of the information that is freely available for entrepreneurial activity when no trade secret has been misappropriated. It is also important to solidify trade secret law as a predictable body of intellectual property jurisprudence with clear rules for claims and defenses that will be applied in the same manner in every case. In patent and copyright law, for example, courts apply uniform standards of IP protection and do not permit efforts to change those standards through common law tort claims. The majority position on UTSA supersession similarly ensures that one set of procedural and substantive rules will govern each particular trade secret case. This makes cases easier to resolve, at lower cost, and may prevent lawsuits over information that is not a trade secret. It also better enables companies to enact policies and make decisions about hiring from competitors and addressing employee departures by referencing such predictable standards.

In jurisdictions that follow the majority position, plaintiffs must take care to define their trade secret rights carefully, and to take advantage of UTSA remedies that are in some cases more extensive than those permitted under pre-UTSA common law. For their part, defendants must not only raise UTSA supersession early in a case to clarify the claims at issue, but also take advantage of the UTSA's specific defenses and its special allowance for recovery of fees and costs in certain cases.

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati is actively following developments around the country with respect to all aspects of trade secret law. The firm is available to assist companies, employees, newly formed businesses, and investors with counseling and litigation regarding these issues. For more information, please contact any member of the firm's employee mobility and trade secrets litigation and intellectual property litigation practices.

1 XpertUniverse v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 09-157-RGA, 2013 WL 867640 (D. Del. Mar. 8, 2013).

2 RSPE Audio Solutions, Inc. v. Vintage King Audio, Inc., No CV 12-06863 DDP, 2013 WL 1120664 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013).

3 Id. at *4 (citing Sunpower Corp. v. SolarCity Corp., No 12-CV-694 LHK, 2012 WL 6160472 at *14 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2012) (internal citations omitted)).

Written by:

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.