Regulating Exploration on the Arctic OCS: Interior Finalizes Rules for Oil and Gas Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf

by K&L Gates LLP

[co-author: Elle Stuart]

[1] On July 7, almost a year and a half after the proposed rules were published, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) announced final regulations regarding future exploratory drilling activities on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in the Arctic.[2]

The final rule focuses on exploratory drilling operations from floating vessels operating on the OCS within the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea Planning Areas (“Arctic OCS”).[3] Recognizing the unique operating conditions in the Arctic—extreme environmental conditions, geographic remoteness, and the general absence of fixed infrastructure and existing operations, the final rule is “designed to help ensure the safe, effective, and responsible exploration of Arctic OCS oil and gas resources, while protecting the marine, coastal, and human environments, and Alaska Natives’ cultural traditions and access to subsistence resources.”[4] As a result, the final rule imposes a number of new requirements, such as the development of comprehensive plans that account for the challenging Arctic conditions and demonstrate that the operator is prepared to respond to any number of issues that may arise on the Arctic OCS, including ready access to a relief rig to ensure quicker response in the event of an incident.

K&L Gates’ Arctic team has been closely following developments in regard to oil, gas, and related infrastructure in the Arctic to assist clients with project development and public policy issues that will influence Arctic development.[5] Though current market conditions have dramatically slowed interest in developing Arctic oil and gas resources, we expect mid- to long-term opportunities will remain.  Companies and investors interested in engaging in Arctic development should understand the new requirements and their direct impacts from a cost, compliance, and enforcement perspective.  With offices in Anchorage, Houston, and Washington, D.C., K&L Gates is strategically positioned to help its clients in both transactions and litigation concerning Alaska’s vast mineral and oil and gas resources.

The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) gives the Secretary of the Interior responsibility for administering the leasing of the OCS and regulating mineral exploration and development operations on OCS leases. In the OCSLA, Congress established a national policy of making the OCS “available for expeditious and orderly development, subject to environmental safeguards, in a manner which is consistent with the maintenance of competition and other national needs.”[6] At the same time, Congress emphasized that the OCS needed to be developed in a safe manner “by well trained personnel using technology, precautions and techniques to prevent or minimize the likelihood of blowouts, loss of well control, fires, spillages, physical obstruction to other users of the waters, or other occurrences which may cause damage to the environment or to property, or endanger life or health.”[7]

The Secretary of the Interior has delegated a significant amount of the administrative and regulatory duties for OCS exploration programs to BOEM and BSEE. BOEM reviews individual Exploration Plans (EP), while BSEE reviews the Application for Permit to Drill (APD) to determine whether the operator’s proposed activities meet the OCSLA standards that govern offshore exploration and development. Under the extensive OCS oil and gas regulatory regime that is already in place, operators are subject to substantial application procedures and information requirements for exploration, development, and production activities; safety requirements for casing and cementing; regulations surrounding the design, installation, use, and maintenance of OCS platforms; development and implementation of Safety and Environmental Management Systems (SEMS); and preparation and submission of an Oil Spill Response Plan (OSRP).[8]

In response to renewed industry interest in exploratory drilling on the Arctic OCS for commercial quantities of oil and natural gas, in February 2015, BOEM and BSEE published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register, entitled “Oil and Gas Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf – Requirements for Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Continental Shelf.”[9] After receiving letters from over 100,000 individual commenters, consulting with Alaska Native Tribes, considering key components of Shell’s 2012 and 2015 Arctic exploratory drilling programs, and conducting extensive environmental and safety analyses, BOEM and BSEE published the final rule that builds on an already very extensive regulatory environment to include additional measures tailored to the unique operational and environmental conditions of the Arctic OCS.[10]

Overview of Final Rule
The Arctic OCS final rule establishes a holistic regulatory framework that is more stringent than the regulations that govern other OCS locations. Importantly, the final rule only applies to Arctic OCS exploratory drilling activities that use mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs) and related operations during the open-water drilling season (typically late June to early November). The final rule does not apply to exploratory drilling on the Arctic OCS using other drilling technologies, including shallow water drilling from gravel islands or the use of a land rig on grounded or land-fast ice. As a result, exploratory drilling operations on the Arctic OCS using non-MODUs technology continue to be subject to the existing OCS oil and gas regulatory regime.[11]

The final rule seeks to ensure that operators identify operational risks early on, plan to avoid and/or mitigate those risks, and understand and account for the unique challenges of operating on the Arctic OCS. As such, the final rule requires each operator to:

  1. Design and conduct exploration programs in a manner that accounts for Arctic OCS conditions;
  2. Develop an integrated operations plan (IOP) that addressed all phases of its proposed Arctic OCS exploration program, which must be submitted to BOEM at least 90 days in advance of filing its EP;
  3. Have access to and the ability to promptly deploy Source Control and Containment Equipment (SCCE) while drilling or working below the surface casing;
  4. Have access to a separate relief rig located close enough to timely drill a relief well in the event of a loss of well control;
  5. Have the ability to predict, track, report, and respond to ice conditions and adverse weather events;
  6. Effectively manage and oversee contractors; and
  7. Develop and implement an OSRP that is designed and executed in a manner that accounts for the unique conditions in the Arctic and that provides the necessary equipment, training, and personnel to respond to an oil spill on the Arctic OCS.[12]

The final rule is estimated to result in new compliance costs for the industry between $1.74 billion and $2.05 billion over 10 years.[13] BOEM and BSEE believe these costs are offset by the “unique significance” of the Arctic ecosystem and the substantial value to be gained if resources can be extracted and marketed economically, and they will not discourage exploratory drilling on the Arctic OCS.[14]

New Operational Requirements
The final regulations include a number of revised and new prescriptive and performance-based requirements for operators on the Arctic OCS, including the development of an IOP, access to deployable SCCE and a relief rig, weather and ice monitoring and forecasting capabilities, planning requirements for oil spill response technology, and contractor oversight. Throughout the final rule, the DOI recognizes that there may be alternative pathways to achieve compliance with these new regulations.

IOP: In addition to the EP and the APD,[15] the final rule requires the development of an IOP that addresses all phases of a proposed Arctic OCS exploration, from preparation to in-theater drilling operations to demobilization.[16] The purpose of the IOP is to describe at a strategic level how exploratory drilling operations will be designed, executed, and managed as an integrated endeavor from start to finish.[17] The primary issues that must be addressed in an IOP are vessel and equipment design; overall schedule of operations; mobilization and demobilization schedules; in-theater drilling objectives and timelines; weather and ice forecasting and management; contractor management and oversight; operational safety principles; staging of spill responses assets; and impact on local community infrastructure and workforce.[18] As a conceptual, informational document, the IOP and the activities described in the IOP do not require agency approval.[19] The overall purpose of the IOP is to allow “relevant agencies to familiarize themselves, early in the planning process, with the operator’s overall proposed program.”[20]

SCCE Capabilities: The types of relief capabilities that are needed to respond to potential crisis events are not generally available in the Arctic. In the aftermath of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico Macondo oil spill, the importance of being able to respond to an incident in a timely manner took on even more importance.  Thus, this final rule requires operators who use a MODU when drilling or working below the surface casing to “be able to stop or capture the flow of an out-of-control well” using their own SCCE (such as a capping stack, cap and flow system, and containment dome).[21]  Operators must have access to and be able to deploy SCCE capable of performing in Arctic conditions.[22]

Relief Rig Requirement: One controversial element of the final rule is BSEE’s requirement that, as a redundancy, operators have access to a separate relief rig that could fully accommodate an out-of-control well.[23] The relief rig must achieve the performance standard of being able to kill and permanently plug an out-of-control well. More specifically, BOEM and BSEE explain that the operator must be able to “drill a relief well, kill and abandon the original well, and abandon the relief well prior to expected seasonal ice encroachment at the drill site” within 45 days.[24] BSEE believes that a relief rig is “currently the most reliable option” for plugging an out-of-control well, but the final rule provides flexibility to operators who can establish that alternative technologies meet or exceed the level of protection provided by the relief rig requirements by permitting the use of BSEE-approved alternative technologies.[25] Operators also are afforded some flexibility in that the final rule clarifies that the description of relief rig capabilities in the EP need only be detailed enough for BOEM to confirm that the operator has plans in place to conduct its operations in a safe manner. Thus, the EP is meant to obtain only the information that is known at the time of submission regarding the operator’s plans for complying with the relief rig requirements.[26]

Weather and Ice Forecasting: BOEM and BSEE require that operators include in their IOPs, EPs, and APDs a description of their weather and ice monitoring and forecasting capabilities for all phases of their exploration program. The final rule further requires operators to (1) notify BOEM and BSEE immediately of any sea ice movement that has the potential to affect operations and (2) notify BSEE of the start and termination of ice management activities and submit written reports after completing these activities.[27]

Oil Spill Response Plan: The final rule notes that OSRPs and related activities should be tailored to the unique Arctic OCS conditions and establishes specific planning requirements to maximize the application of oil spill response technology and ensure a coordinated response system.[28]

Reducing Pollution: In response to concerns from partners including Alaska Native Tribes, BSEE also requires the capture of all petroleum-based mud and associated cuttings from Arctic OCS exploratory drilling operations to prevent the discharge of such pollutants into the marine environment.[29]

Contractor Oversight: DOI is requiring that operators provide an explanation in their IOP of how they would apply oversight and risk management protocols to their personnel and contractors. Further, Arctic OCS operators are required to (1) report threatening sea ice conditions and unexpected operational issues that could result in a loss of well control, (2) conduct real-time monitoring of well operations,[30] (3) increase SEMS auditing frequency,[31] and (4) enhance their oil-spill preparedness and response capabilities.[32]

Industry Responses
In a press briefing, Interior Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management Janice Schneider stated, “The Arctic rule will raise the bar for safety and environmental protection for any future exploration of Arctic OCS oil and gas resources.”[33] The debate that immediately followed the release of the final rule was whether this bar was high enough or too high.

Some environmental groups allege that the final rule did not do enough, noting that the Interior Department released “minimum regulations” that need strengthening,[34] and in one case asserted that “the only ‘safe’ form of drilling for the Arctic and the climate is none at all.”[35]

Industry groups like the American Petroleum Institute (API), however, have challenged the basis for the final rule. API Upstream and Industry Operations Director Erik Milito released a statement asserting that some of the new requirements “may not improve safety and in fact may inhibit innovation and technological advancements.”[36] Similarly, National Ocean Industries Association President Randall Luthi said that although the rule provides some hope to the offshore industry in that they now know the applicable regulatory requirements, the rule “does not accurately reflect current industry capabilities and includes unnecessary requirements, such as same season relief wells, which may not be needed due to the availability of new response and containment equipment.”[37] For their part, the Arctic Energy Center stated, “even though the Administration has aggressively pursued a policy that restricts oil and gas development, today’s regulations do signify its recognition that America’s largest energy opportunity—the offshore Arctic—can be explored safely and responsibly.”[38]

Given that operators recently have scaled back significantly on investments in Arctic OCS exploration (see Shell’s decision to discontinue their exploratory drilling), the extensive additional requirements set out in the final rules are expected to add significant costs to any future industry activities in the Arctic region. Although BOEM and BSEE recognize alternative and cooperative solutions, such as mutual aid agreements, to meet SCCE and relief rig capabilities and help manage the compliance costs of the new regulations, the final rule nonetheless is likely to further detract operators from investing in the Arctic region, particularly in the short- and medium-term.  For future medium- and long-term opportunities, companies will have to consider and likely accommodate these new BOEM and BSEE requirements.

[1] The authors would like to thank Summer Associate Elle Stuart for her substantial contributions to this alert.

[2] Pending publication in the Federal Register, the Final Rulemaking is available here:

[3] 30 C.F.R. § 250.105.

[4] Final Rulemaking at 1, 15.

[5] See the Arctic team’s previous alert on the proposed rule here:

[6] 43 U.S.C. § 1332(3).

[7] 43 U.S.C. § 1332(6).

[8] Final Rulemaking at 29.

[9] 80 Fed. Reg. 9916 (Feb. 24, 2015).

[10] Final Rulemaking at 15–16.

[11] Id. at 4, 15.

[12] Final Rulemaking at 5.

[13] Id. at 17–18.

[14] Id. at 18–19.

[15] Additional information must also be filed with the APD. 30 C.F.R. § 250.470.

[16] 30 C.F.R. § 550.204.

[17] Final Rulemaking at 33.

[18] Id. at 34.

[19] Id. at 35.

[20] Id.

[21] Id. at 36.

[22] 30 C.F.R. § 250.471.

[23] § 250.472.

[24] Id.

[25] § 250.472(c); § 250.141.

[26] § 550.220(c)(4)).

[27] § 250.188(c); § 250.470; § 550.220(c)(2).

[28] §§ 254.55, .65, .70, .80, .90.

[29] Final Rulemaking at 39; 30 C.F.R. § 250.300 (b)(1)

[30] § 250.452.

[31] § 250.1920.

[32] Id.

[33] U.S. Finalizes Arctic Drilling Rule, Mar. Executive (Jul. 7, 2016),

[34] Valerie Volcovici, U.S. Finalizes Arctic Energy Development Regulation, Reuters (Jul. 8. 2016), 

[35] Id.

[36] Reid Porter, API: Arctic Rule Could Inhibit Innovation, Technological Advancements and U.S. Energy Leadership, Amer. Petroleum Inst. (Jul. 7, 2016),

[37] U.S. Finalizes Arctic Drilling Rule, supra note 31.

[38] James Osborne, Stricter Rules Put in Place for Arctic Drilling, Hous. Chron. (Jul. 7, 2016, 10:42PM),



Written by:

K&L Gates LLP

K&L Gates LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.