Regulation Best Interest and ESG Investing: Confluence for the SEC or Consternation Under ERISA?

Jones Day

Compliance with new Regulation Best Interest ("Regulation BI") need not prevent environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") investing, but beware of new proposed restrictions for some.

As of June 30, 2020, U.S.-registered broker-dealers must comply with the Securities and Exchange Commission's (the "Commission") Regulation BI, which establishes a standard of conduct for broker-dealers making recommendations to retail customers and prohibits broker-dealers from putting their financial interests ahead of their customers' interests. Under Regulation BI's Care Obligation, a broker-dealer making recommendations must consider several factors in its exercise of care, including the cost of the product, the existence of reasonable alternatives, and any material limitations (e.g., limited product offerings) the broker-dealer may have. Once a recommendation is objectively analyzed, it then must be vetted for consistency with a customer's investment profile, including any stated investment objective.

The rising popularity of ESG investing, however, raises numerous and unanticipated issues as it plays out across the regulatory landscape, in particular in the financial services sector. Because ESG investments sometimes carry a higher price tag and costs than non-ESG investments, some broker-dealers may be hesitant to recommend ESG investments in view of the newly imposed Care Obligation under Regulation BI.

Cost is, however, only one of many important factors that firms should consider under the Care Obligation―in fact, in the Regulation BI adopting release, the Commission cautioned against reflexively recommending the least expensive security, stating that a broker-dealer would not satisfy its requirements by simply recommending the least expensive security without analyzing the customer's investment profile. Furthermore, additional subjective factors, such as highly personalized non-economic considerations, have their place in the recommendation analysis. Firms should, of course, ensure that the policies and procedures for their recommendation analysis and related underlying documentation provide appropriate support for any of their recommendations on ESG investments.

Further complicating the regulatory landscape, however, is the U.S. Department of Labor's ("DOL") recently announced rule proposal regarding DOL's investment duties regulation for pension plan fiduciaries, which, if adopted, would preclude Employee Retirement Income Security Act plan fiduciaries from investing in ESG vehicles when an underlying investment strategy of the vehicle is to subordinate return or increase risk for the purpose of non-financial objectives. This proposal is opposed by, among others, the New York State Department of Financial Services, which argues that it will discourage fiduciaries from investing in ESG vehicles or considering ESG factors.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jones Day | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Jones Day

Jones Day on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.