Rep. Lucido’s Macomb Solution to get rid of Michigan’s Mandatory Car Insurance is Ludicrous

by Michigan Auto Law

So-called “Macomb Solution” to get rid of mandatory car insurance in Michigan and allowing drivers to elect to be uninsured is epically bad idea; financial ruin if a car crash occurs

Macomb Solution: End mandatory car insurance, let drivers choose to drive uninsured

Macomb County Rep. Pete Lucido’s so-called Macomb Solution to allow drivers to elect to get rid of Michigan’s mandatory auto No Fault car insurance is a horrible idea.

Yet, six House politicians (4 of whom also represent Macomb County) have recently proposed just that.

This ill-conceived, poorly-thought-out, convoluted package of bills – House Bill 5627-5633 – is built around the central idea of ending the legal requirement that drivers purchase auto No Fault car insurance and giving these drivers the choice to elect to go without any auto insurance at all.

In the pantheon of bad ideas, this one’s epic.

This plan would shift millions of dollars in costs onto taxpayers and Medicaid to cover these uninsured drivers who then, inevitably, are involved in car accidents. It also leaves many people who may elect to drive uninsured with no idea of just how bad things will be for them if they do suffer serious personal injury. Finally, for all the people who do elect to purchase auto insurance, it leaves them exposed to personal and financial ruin if they are seriously injured by an uninsured driver (thanks to Pete Lucido’s Macomb Solution plan) but who did not also purchase optional uninsured motorist coverage to protect them from uninsured drivers. As a car accident lawyer, I should note that because this coverage is optional, and because insurance agents are under no legal or fiduciary obligation under Michigan law to even inform people that this coverage exists, there are hundreds of thousands or even millions of drivers who believe they are properly protected but who are not if they are involved in a car crash caused by an uninsured driver.

My sincere hope is that this is just an ill-conceived publicity stunt by Pete Lucido (R-Shelby Township), who, as the primary sponsor of House Bill 5627, appears to be the ringleader in the drive to let some drivers play Russian Roulette on our roads.

This is not the first time I have had to call out the Macomb Republican lawmaker on this auto law blog. Recall that in 2015, Rep. Lucido wanted to take $1 billion away from catastrophically injured Michigan car accident victims (money that was dutifully paid in by drivers as part of their insurance bill and was actively being used to pay present and future catastrophic medical costs) and give it to the Michigan Transportation Fund for road repairs. Thankfully, the bill died due to inaction at the conclusion of the 2015-2016 legislative session.

Macomb Solution to end mandatory auto No Fault car insurance may bring us some savings, but at too high a cost

This absurd plan is misleadingly called a “solution,” but it should be called playing insurance Russian Roulette.

Yes, folks who cancel their insurance will be able to put as much as $2,300 per vehicle per year back in their pockets, according to’s “Car insurance rates by state, 2017 edition.”

But these newly uninsured-drivers-by-choice better hold tight and pray that they aren’t involved in a car accident.

Without the financial protection that insurance provides, they’ll need every penny of their so-called “savings” if they’re ever injured in a serious car crash.

And if these uninsured drivers cause a bad car accident?  As you’ll see below, the cost will wipe them out completely.

Uninsured drivers will suffer most if insurance is eliminated under Lucido’s Macomb Solution

Under House Bill 5627’s plan for a Michigan without mandatory car insurance, the outlook for uninsured drivers is bleak.

If an uninsured driver is injured in a car crash that’s not his fault, then here’s how things will unfold:

  • The uninsured driver (i.e., the car crash victim) must sue the at-fault driver for everything: pain and suffering; full vehicle damage; medical expenses; lost wages; replacement services; attendant care.
  • If the at-fault driver is also uninsured – and without sufficient personal assets to pay damages – then the uninsured victim won’t be able to collect anything. No pain and suffering. No vehicle damage repairs costs. No reimbursement for medical bills or lost wages. At best, the victim may be able to get medical bills paid if he has private health insurance or is eligible for Medicaid or Medicare. Beyond that, to the extent he gets any of the post-crash care and services he needs, he’ll have to pay out-of-pocket.
  • If the at-fault driver is insured, however, then the uninsured victim won’t be able to sue him for much of anything. The No Fault threshold law would still apply, barring any claims for pain and suffering except where a “serious impairment of body function” could be shown; a recovery for vehicle damage would be limited to the $1,000 Mini Tort maximum; and, finally, the No Fault law’s abolishment of “tort liability” for the insured at-fault driver would prevent the victim from suing for medical or wage loss or anything else.

From there, things only get worse – much worse – if the uninsured driver is the one who was at-fault in causing a crash. That scenario would unfold as follows:

  • The uninsured, at-fault driver could be sued for pain and suffering (with no No Fault threshold law to protect him); full vehicle damage; medical expenses; lost wages; replacement services; attendant care. It appears from the wording of HB 5627 that, even if No Fault covered the last four items, there’s nothing to stop a victim from “double-dipping” and suing the uninsured, at-fault driver for those same costs.
  • If the uninsured, at-fault driver had also suffered disabling injuries in the car crash he caused, then, in addition to being financially responsible for the items above, he would also need to find a way to pay for his own medical care and treatment as well as replace or compensate for his lost wages or figure out a way to survive without a source of income.

Only 2 states do not have mandatory car insurance requirements – but they weren’t so extreme as to enact their own Macomb Solution

Only two states (Virginia and New Hampshire) have gone down this road – and they weren’t as no-holds-barred as this Macomb Solution package of bills aspires to take Michigan.

Proponents of HB 5627 might point to Virginia and New Hampshire – which the Insurance Information Institute describes as “rare exceptions to compulsory auto insurance laws” – as models for their proposed elimination of a mandatory insurance requirement in Michigan.

However, as politicians are prone to do, they wouldn’t be telling the whole story.

While drivers in Virginia are not required to obtain car insurance, if they choose not to, they must pay a $500 “uninsured motor vehicle fee” to the state. (See Code of Virginia 46.2-706)

Similarly, “New Hampshire Motor Vehicle Laws do not require you to carry Auto Insurance, but you must be able to demonstrate that you are able to provide sufficient funds to meet New Hampshire Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Requirements in the event of an “at-fault” accident [i.e., if you’re an uninsured driver and you’re at-fault in causing a car accident]. If you are unable to meet these requirements your driving privileges in New Hampshire may be suspended.” (State of New Hampshire’s Insurance Department, “Your Guide to Understanding Auto Insurance in the Granite State”)

In my follow-up blog post coming soon, I will dig deeper into the details of HB 5627 to discuss the future of No Fault, caps on benefits and the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association (MCCA).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Michigan Auto Law | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Michigan Auto Law

Michigan Auto Law on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.